• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

WORRIES UK DEFENCE INDUSTRY DOMESTIC MELTDOWN

June 3, 2004 by

MORE WORRIES ABOUT UK DEFENCE INDUSTRY DOMESTIC MELTDOWN

May 27 2004. The FT reported that within the space of less than 12 hours on Wednesday, a trio of events encapsulated the British government’s move into the uncharted territory of throwing one of the most sensitive parts of the economy – the defence industry – open to outsiders.

In Rome, Finmeccanica, the Italian aerospace and defence group, announced a £1.06bn ($1.95bn) deal to buy out GKN, its UK partner, from their 50:50 AgustaWestland joint venture. The UK Westland business is the country’s main supplier of helicopters to the armed forces.

Later the same day in Brussels, the European Commission announced that it had cleared an agreed £309m bid by General Dynamics of the US for Alvis, the UK’s only maker of tanks and armoured vehicles. Clearance from the European regulator was largely a formality: the UK government has the final say on the deal, and at the moment shows no signs of demurring.

The significance of both deals was not lost on the crowd of dignitaries at a defence gathering in Whitehall that evening. As Geoff Hoon, the defence secretary, began his speech at a reception to mark the official opening of the UK office of EADS, the Franco-German aerospace and defence contractor, by welcoming it to London, someone in the audience quipped: “Just as well, seeing as our arms industry all seems to be heading the other way.”

Britain’s apparent willingness to countenance the sale of many of the “crown jewels” of its defence industry would be considered heresy in other big weapons-making countries such as the US, Russia, France, Germany and Italy. In the US, with a few notable exceptions, the Pentagon effectively operates a US-only policy when it comes to appointing prime contractors (see below).Britain, on the other hand, has for the past 18 months been trying to set defence procurement policy according to a document called the “defence industrial policy”. This, it says, seeks to balance on the one hand the need to equip its armed forces with advanced weapons and systems and on the other hand an already overstretched defence budget, with the aim of maximising the economic benefits to the UK only truly international defence suppliers have the scale necessary to supply equipment at attractive prices. Efficiency and value-for-money are the watchwords – both relative strangers to the world of defence procurement, where the development of cutting edge technologies often leads to delays and huge cost-overruns.

But while many inside the defence industry approve of the British government’s approach, there are growing concerns about its failure properly to develop and flesh out the “open market” policy in a way that gives clarity to contractors – both domestic and overseas. “I think the important point about the defence industry is that it is now increasingly international and if companies like the one I work for are going to invest in the UK, as my company has very substantially in the last 10 years, then we need to be sure that there are conditions for doing good business here and a joined-up view of what the national priorities are for industrial capability,” John Howe, vice-chairman of Thales UK, said this week when he gave evidence to a committee of British MPs investigating defence procurement.

Some in Britain, meanwhile, believe the government is putting jobs at risk. Bruce George, chairman of the committee of MPs, said the approach was “laisser-faire”. His concern is that in any downturn foreign companies would first look to cut jobs in Britain rather than in their own countries.

The government points out that to qualify to bid for defence programmes a supplier – irrespective of its nationality – must demonstrate that employment, technology and intellectual property rights remain in the UK.

But even Lord Bach, the defence procurement minister who w

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    January 26, 2023
    Read more
  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    January 20, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    January 20, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT