• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • SPECTRA banner
  • Curtiss-Wright banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Contact

TYPE 45 DECOMMISSIONING

June 8, 2013 by

TYPE 45 DECOMMISSIONING
Timely Reminder Of Past Military Collaboration Planning Failures!
By Howard Wheeldon, FRAeS, Wheeldon Strategic Advisory Ltd.

06 Jun 13. I have little idea whether it is just coincidence that the Portsmouth decommissioning ceremony of the Royal Navy last Type 42 Destroyer ON June 6th happens to be occurring on the 69th anniversary of the 1944 D-Day landings but it is surely worthy of note. My purpose in writing around the decommissioning of HMS Edinburgh is not just to record the event itself but to remind of what I hope are now well heeded lessons from past failed European collaboration attempts in respect of designing a potential Type 42 replacement more than two decades ago.
First a reminder of the fine class of ship whose official retirement from Royal Navy service is commemorated at the official decommissioning ceremony today. In total, fourteen Type 42 Destroyers had been built for the Royal Navy between 1968 and December 1985. In addition two further vessels of this class were built for the Argentine Navy – one of which remains in active service to this day.

Born from cancellation of the CVA-01 carrier programme back in 1966 and its proposed attendant escort class Destroyer which was then known as the ‘Type 82’ the decision to go ahead with development of a smaller, lighter and presumably cheaper alternative vessel to be known as the Type 42 Destroyer was mercifully swift. Three separate batches of ships built by Swann Hunter, Cammell Laird, Vickers Shipbuilders and Vosper Thornycroft at varying times they were equipped with a variety of weapons and most usually carried a Westland Lynx Helicopter. Powered by a combination of Rolls-Royce Olympus and Tyne engines these ships were extremely powerful if costly to operate.

Type 42’s were to see service in virtually every conflict and area that the Royal Navy engaged including the war in the South Atlantic during which two ships, HMS Sheffield and HMS Coventry, were to be sunk with the loss of many lives. I suspect that no true account of Type 42 should ignore that these were sometimes unreliable ships particular during the later years of service when the degree of obsolescence had significantly increased. Nevertheless these were very fine ships indeed.

The decommissioning of any ship is a sad occasion but it should also be seen as a celebration of what that ship has achieved during its life and of the many associations made. During her 27 years in service with the Royal Navy HMS Edinburgh which was the last Type 42 built had seen active service in the Gulf and travelled far and wide either protecting British interests, providing the wide ranging NATO role required of the Royal Navy and visiting many international ports on goodwill visits flying the flag of Britain. This is what the Royal Navy does and it does it brilliantly with increasingly less resource.

Whilst the specific role for which the Type 42 ships had been built likely increased over the years that followed the ending of the ‘Cold War’ we can today take little comfort that of fourteen Type 42 ships originally built for the Royal Navy these have now been replaced by just six Type 45 Destroyers.

Having paid my due respects to the Type 42 class and to HMS Edinburgh itself I turn now to how back in the late 1980’s we had set about planning for the necessary Type 42 replacement. Although thankfully many of the more ridiculous proposals of the 1982 Nott Defence White Paper were to eventually be scrapped it was clear that this set a pattern for future significant cuts to be made particularly to Royal Navy and Royal Air Force operations. While most usually I concentrate predominantly on my own air power centre of excellence I am today restricting my thoughts mainly to aspects of maritime capability.

The Nott review which was based solely on cutting defence expenditure as opposed to concentration on future defence strategy had signalled major cuts in maritime capabili

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • Pythia
  • Teledyne
  • Exensor
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • ECHODYNE logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
  • Leonardo DRS logo
  • MTC logo
  • IDC logo
  • DSEI logo
  • DVD2024 logo
  • SDSC logo
  • TELEDYNE FLIR logo
  • VeteranUK logo
  • Matrix Space logo
  • ST Engineering logo
  • EWS logo
  • sentinel photonics logo
  • capua logo
  • Curtiss-Wright logo
  • Brave1 logo
  • Drone Evolution logo
  • AEI Systems logo
  • EOS logo
  • NMSUK logo
  • Openworks logo
  • Sandown Park logo
Hilux UKDSE AARTOS ST Engineering Future Artillery

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
41 St Georges Drive
London SW1V 4DG

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • Protek Selected By Dutch Armed Forces

    May 2, 2026
    Read more
  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    May 1, 2026
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    May 1, 2026
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2026.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT