• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • SPECTRA banner
  • Curtiss-Wright banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Contact

TREASURY INTERVENTION IN TRAINER DEAL RISKS UK SHARE

September 2, 2003 by

WILL TREASURY INTERVENTION IN TRAINER DEAL RISK POSSIBILITY OF UK SHARING IN MULTI-MILLION POUND TRAINER MARKET?

18 Jun 03. Following our story last week (See ‘BAE SURROUNDED IN MERGER SPECULATION – MAJOR TRAINING DEAL ON HOLD?’, BATTLESPACE UPDATE Vol.5 ISSUE 25, June 11th 2003)with regard to the Treasury intervention in the BAE unsolicited PFI offer for the fighter training requirement, it appears that New Labour has developed an antipathy to anything with ‘Made by BAE Systems’ on the box. BAE Systems told BATTLESPACE at Paris that the MoD believed that BAE was benefiting to the tune of 40% of the defence budget when after examination it is only 25% at most. Over the trainer PFI deal it has a chance to put the boot in again at the expense of a national asset, the Hawk Trainer, Britain’s most successful home grown aircraft.

More worryingly the government appears to have turned its back on industry and believes that the British economy can survive as a ‘post-industrial’ service industry-based economy. The Treasury may save money on the study for another trainer but the downside in the loss of technology and jobs would be a catastrophe.

Dick Evans, Chairman of BAE said that the decision to create a competition over the Hawk was political, a possible push for a BAE/Finmeccanica merger on the back of this deal. The Hawk has produced billions of dollars in earnings from a UK Government investment of £1bn equivalent in 1972 with over 800 aircraft supplied to 18 nations. The fact that Korea and Lockheed Martin have invested millions in the T50 and Aermaachi millions in the 346 must give an indication as to the size of the potential market. All three firms estimate a market of between 1500 and 1700 aircraft over the next 20 years. The two contenders are hardly off the drawing board and the 346 has no order from Italy. As we write BAE is struggling to finalise a 17 year deal with the Indian Government for 66 aircraft which can not be signed off if the UK may not buy the plane for its own air force. But this is just the start, the UK PFI training requirement is for 31 aircraft to replace those at 19 Squadron in RAF Valley, another 13 for other replacements in a total fleet of 176 aircraft. The Eurotrainer requirement requires at least 100 aircraft and these are all in the short term.

But as Dave Potter of BAE told BATTLESPACE, “We have heard stories of the Hawk being an old aircraft. The Hawk of today is totally different from that of the 1972 era. We have a new glass cockpit, new avionics and wing and tail sections with some fly-by-wire capability. We can fly supersonic if required but most nations have dropped this requirement for training. Lastly, our customers like the Hawk and its design, it may look the same from the outside, but from the inside it is world-class as recent sales to Australia, Bahrain and South Africa clearly demonstrate.”

Both the T50 and the 346 are aircraft in very early stages of development and stand little chance of being fully proven for an ISD for the UK of 2007. Both claim higher thrust but this is not required for young pilots and we have witnessed the Hawk trouncing the twin engined Alpha jet across the world (the 346 is twin engined and thus more expensive to maintain).

The Unions and the DTI are fighting hard on this one to preserve 1900 jobs at Brough and many more at associated businesses such as Rolls-Royce and Smiths, and the UK’s only home grown aircraft, but will New Labour fight on and not rest until our aerospace and defence industries, all world beaters, are consigned to the bin alongside the electronics and car industries, don’t bet on a change of mind in the short term.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • Pythia
  • Teledyne
  • Exensor
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • ECHODYNE logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
  • Leonardo DRS logo
  • MTC logo
  • IDC logo
  • DSEI logo
  • DVD2024 logo
  • SDSC logo
  • TELEDYNE FLIR logo
  • VeteranUK logo
  • Matrix Space logo
  • ST Engineering logo
  • EWS logo
  • sentinel photonics logo
  • capua logo
  • Curtiss-Wright logo
  • Brave1 logo
  • Drone Evolution logo
  • AEI Systems logo
  • EOS logo
  • NMSUK logo
  • Openworks logo
  • Sandown Park logo
Hilux UKDSE AARTOS ST Engineering Future Artillery

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
41 St Georges Drive
London SW1V 4DG

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • Protek Selected By Dutch Armed Forces

    May 2, 2026
    Read more
  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    May 1, 2026
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    May 1, 2026
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2026.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT