Sponsored by MatrixSpace
http://matrixspace.com
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
18 Feb 26. DOD eyes commercial satellites that can spy on other satellites. The Pentagon is looking for cheap commercial satellites that can maintain surveillance on other satellites in orbit, including close-range inspections, according to a Defense Innovation Unit solicitation published Tuesday. The Geosynchronous High-Resolution Optical Space-Based Tactical Reconnaissance project — also referred to as “Ghost Recon” (as in the Tom Clancy novels and video games) — is intended to address a vulnerability in America’s space-monitoring capabilities. The problem is that DOD “lacks sufficient satellites capable of providing high-resolution space-to-space imagery and maintaining custody of both friendly and adversarial satellites in geosynchronous orbit (GEO),” according to the solicitation. Hence, the Pentagon is looking for commercial satellites that can be launched within two years after the contract begins. Within three years, those satellites would become government owned and operated. Within four years, they will have to demonstrate the ability to “perform at least one drive-by (Sub or Super Sync) or an inclined track design reference mission (DRM) per week through the first year of government operations,” the solicitation states. The goal is relatively inexpensive and scalable designs, including space vehicles, satellite buses and payloads that offer “high-resolution space-to-space imagery and accurate object characterization,” DIU said.
“These systems must reduce costs compared to existing and planned programs of record while achieving high-resolution image collection, allowing for increased collection frequency and detailed characterization of resident space objects (RSOs) in GEO. The successful deployment of these capabilities will significantly improve GEO RSO Characterization, Battle Damage Assessment (BDA), Positive Identification (PID), and Combat Identification (CID),” the solicitation notes.
DIU envisions a spacecraft that can move close to other satellites. The result would be “fully resolved imagery of an ESPA Grande-sized spacecraft and its key subsystems (i.e. star tracker, communications payload, mission payload) from a distance of no closer than 10 kilometers,” according to the solicitation. Ghost Recon satellites would also need to maneuver above or below GEO altitude to maximize solar lighting of the target.
Interestingly, DIU suggests satellites from other nations may be less than cooperative when it comes to having their picture taken, such as moving away from American space vehicles. The solicitation cites the possibility of using “several [space vehicles] to support collection of tasked RSO, [which are] used to support collection for uncooperative RSOs.”
While Ghost Recon satellites would mainly track space objects that have already been detected, they may have to search for targets themselves, including “detection and localization of untracked or non-cooperative RSOs,” according to the solicitation. Contractors are asked to detail the capabilities of their designs, including the cost for a Ghost Recon satellite to revisit another space object every 30 days for 10 years. Companies must also specify slew rate, mission payload angular resolution and modular transfer function. Minimum requirements include the ability to “successfully perform rendezvous and proximity operations,” according to the solicitation. Satellites must also be capable of operating for at least three years in GEO, meet National Security Space Launch medium and large standards for launch integration, and use Unified S-Band protocols. Though DIU wants affordable spacecraft that can be deployed within two years, the solution mentions the possibility of refueling these platforms “to extend spacecraft lifespan, increase maneuverability for follow-on missions, and reduce replacement cadence.” The project deadline is March 3. (Source: Defense News)
18 Feb 26. Astrolight, a space and defence-tech company pioneering laser communication solutions across space, ground, and maritime domains, is set to demonstrate its low-SWaP ATLAS-1 laser communication terminals in space for the first time. The terminals will enable secure, high-bandwidth space-to-ground communication on two satellites, each carrying ATLAS-1, scheduled for launch this March aboard SpaceX’s Transporter-16. The satellites support two separate missions coordinated by Astrolight’s clients: the National Kapodistrian University of Athens and the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in Greece. Ahead of the demonstrations in space, each ATLAS-1 terminal completed comprehensive client-led testing to confirm reliable and consistent operation on satellites and across a range of environmental conditions.
“These in-orbit missions are a big milestone for the global small satellite industry,” said Laurynas Mačiulis, CEO of Astrolight. “Smallsat operators have long faced the issue of having to sacrifice data traffic due to the limitations of radio spectrum and antenna size. Because ATLAS-1 is laser-based, it provides high data rates, but with equipment that is smaller and more affordable than many other solutions on the market.”
As laser communication uses narrow, focused beams of infrared light, it can transmit data at up to 100 times faster rates than traditional radio frequency (RF) and is immune to electronic interference.
“With orbit becoming more crowded, operators relying on traditional radio-frequency links are facing growing spectrum licensing limitations and increasing exposure to unintentional interference,” said Mačiulis. “Integrating laser communication into space systems is one of the best ways to deliver secure, high-throughput connectivity while reducing dependence on scarce RF spectrum and its constraints.”
Two satellites carrying ATLAS-1 will be part of Greece’s national small satellite initiative, backed by the European Space Agency. Operating within the ERMIS satellite constellation and the PeakSat mission, they will demonstrate gigabit-per-second downlinks to optical ground stations (OGSs) in Greece, helping to advance Greece’s national space infrastructure. ERMIS, Greece’s first small satellite constellation mission, coordinated by the National Kapodistrian University of Athens, aims to establish novel space communications services such as Low Earth Orbit 5G-IoT, Inter-Satellite Link, and optical downlink. The latter, enabled by ATLAS-1, will support hyperspectral Earth observation capabilities for national needs, including precise agriculture. Laser-based connectivity will be tested with links established between ATLAS-1 and Helmos OGS in Greece. The PeakSat mission, designed by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, will specifically evaluate the operational performance of the Holomondas OGS, paving the way for the broader adoption of optical communication technologies in Greece. The laser link between ATLAS-1 on board the satellite and the ground station will be tested across a range of scenarios, including different elevation angles, weather conditions, and illumination environments.
To ensure precise alignment of Holomondas OGS with the satellite’s laser terminal and enable data reception at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, Astrolight has upgraded the station with an advanced 808-nanometer Laser Beacon and a compatible C-band optical receiver, designed to meet the demands of laser communication under varying atmospheric and operational conditions.
“With this first in-orbit demonstration of ATLAS-1, we want to prove that high-speed, secure downlinks don’t have to be reserved for large spacecraft,” said Mačiulis. “In the near future, laser links will save small satellite operators time and resources necessary to pursue more high-scale missions, while enhancing the throughput and security of communication.”
Following the development of ATLAS-1, Astrolight is now working on ATLAS-2, a low-SWaP laser terminal for both inter-satellite and space-to-ground communication.
12 Feb 26. SES Executive Confirms End of the 15-Year Satellite Era. Dispatch from SmallSat Symposium. Coverage and analysis from across the conference, tracking the forces shaping the next phase of the SmallSat market. For decades, the geostationary arc located 35,786 kilometers above the equator served as the undisputed domain of massive, bn-dollar platforms designed to generate revenue for twenty years. That economic certainty officially evaporated, however, during the SmallSat Symposium session titled The Future of GEO Satellites. (GEO = Geosynchronous Equatorial Orbit)
Taking the stage, Dr. Bryan Benedict, Senior Director of Innovation at SES Space & Defense, dismantled rather than defended the legacy model. He described the merger between satellite giants SES and Intelsat that created a fleet of over 100 operational spacecraft not as a strategic power play but as a tactic necessary for survival.
Benedict spoke bluntly about the regulatory shifts enabling this consolidation. While antitrust laws would have blocked such a merger a decade ago, regulators changed their stance due to a single existential threat: the commoditization of bandwidth by Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations like Starlink: “Our competition is not other GEO operators; it’s proliferated LEO.”
This admission marks a sharp turning point for the industry. The massive battlestar satellites (6,000-kilogram behemoths designed to amortize capital costs over two decades) have become financial liabilities. Rapidly falling bandwidth prices have shattered the spreadsheet logic that underpinned the modern telecommunications industry.
“Likely, the majority of those satellites will not be replaced,” Benedict told the hushed room, “because the business case for them just no longer closes,”.
The Collapse of the 15-Year ROI
The mood in Mountain View reflects a state of forced adaptation. While the halls bustle with startups pitching agility, a reality check came down from the top of the food chain. The mathematics of geostationary orbit are fundamentally broken. Operators can neither predict demand fifteen years out, nor justify locking hundreds of ms of dollars into static hardware.
Benedict detailed the collapse of the return on investment. Under the heritage model, a satellite paid for itself in five to seven years, generating pure profit for the subsequent decade. That window has slammed shut.
“Now you might get your money back at the end of 15 years, and that’s the life of the satellite,” Benedict explained. “So that business case, when you take into account the risk involved, just does not work.”
Financial toxicity has subsequently emptied manufacturing pipelines. Industry veterans accustomed to busy clean rooms now see a significant slowdown. “We’ve been to the spacecraft high bays and they are packed full of commercial GEOs being built?” Benedict asked, then answered, “No, you’re completely wrong. The high bays are not packed with GEOs anymore.”
The MicroGEO Pivot and the Reliability Trap
The MicroGEO revolution now fills the vacuum left by legacy giants. This new class of sub-1,000-kilogram satellites promises to lower the barrier to entry for GEO and enable rapid technology refreshes, mirroring what CubeSats achieved for LEO.
The concept prioritizes fleet redundancy over internal redundancy. Rather than relying on a single exquisite asset with triple-redundant systems, operators launch swarms of cheaper, single-string satellites. If one fails, the network survives.
“You have not internal redundancy but fleet redundancy,” Benedict said.
This shift responds to a practical necessity, not a theoretical exercise. The U.S. Department of Defense has pivoted to a proliferated warfighting architecture, injecting bns into the sector through the $151 bn SHIELD contract vehicle. The Pentagon, viewing large satellites as fat targets, now demands distributed resilience.
However, the transition is fraught with peril. The MicroGEO sector is currently reeling from high-profile failures, including, earlier this year, the loss of Astranis’s UtilitySat, which was stranded in a useless transfer orbit following a propulsion failure. Reliability remains the unspoken ghost in the machine. Benedict, a chemical engineer by training, hinted at the supply chain fragility accompanying this shift.
“Things that we used to call COTS (Commercial Off-The-Shelf), they’re not on the shelf anymore because they were being built for GEO spacecraft,” Benedict noted.
The LEO Threat Was Underestimated
Perhaps the session’s most sobering moment was Benedict’s recollection of the industry’s hubris regarding Starlink and other mega-constellations. Legacy operators spent years convincing themselves that LEO was a niche product that would not cannibalize their core business.
“We were assured by the proliferated LEO companies, ‘This is not a threat for you guys. This is an entirely new business. You guys don’t have to worry,’” Benedict recounted. “Yeah, right.”
That complacency cost the sector dearly. Old Space operators are now scrambling to integrate multi-orbit capabilities, linking GEO, MEO, and LEO into a single network. The user, particularly the military warfighter, has stopped caring about orbital mechanics.
“The warfighter just wants to know they can get connected and they don’t care how—they just want to be connected,” Benedict said.
A Fractured Horizon
The conclusion from here is clear: the geostationary belt is not being abandoned, but gentrified. High-rent, monolithic tenants are moving out, replaced by a higher density of smaller, more agile structures. This is no longer a real estate game of location, location, location. It is a technology race defined by refresh cycles and integration.
Dr. Benedict’s address served as a grim obituary for the status quo. While the Golden Dome of missile defense may provide a lifeline for small satellite manufacturers, the days of easy money for the commercial sector are gone. The high bays are empty, the order books are thin, and the only thing proliferating is risk.
As Benedict stated regarding the sector’s future, “It sounds like the word of God coming from up above.” The commandment is simple: Evolve or de-orbit. (Source: Satnews)
12 Feb 26. Space as a Sanctions Workaround: Financial Engineering & Shadow Procurement Networks.
A strategic examination of Iran’s aerospace trajectory in early 2026 reveals a sophisticated convergence between the nation’s nascent space program and its global sanctions-evasion architecture.
Following the reimposition of UN “snapback” sanctions in October 2025, Tehran has increasingly utilized its civil space ambitions as a legitimate “front” for the procurement of dual-use technologies and the engineering of shadow financial channels.
The analysis, supported by a Feb. 6, 2026, FinCEN advisory, suggests that “Space” has become the ultimate dual-use shield for Iran’s military-industrial complex.
The Shadow Banking Nexus
The Iranian space program is no longer funded solely through state budgets but through a “shadow banking” network that FinCEN recently valued at over $9 bn in annual transactions.
- Mechanism: Iranian oil and petrochemical revenues are laundered through exchange houses in Hong Kong, the UAE, and Singapore.
- Procurement: These funds are then used to purchase export-controlled microelectronics—specifically High-Electron Mobility Transistors (HEMTs) and Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs)—which are essential for both satellite transponders and ballistic missile guidance systems.
- Waystations: Procurement agents route these items through “unwitting” intermediaries in Turkey, Germany, and Malaysia before they reach the Iranian Space Agency (ISA).
The Civil Front for Military R&D
By branding its activities as “civil space exploration,” Iran achieves two strategic goals:
- ICBM Maturation: U.S. defense officials have warned that the development of the Simorgh and Zuljanah Satellite Launch Vehicles (SLVs) serves as a critical surrogate for Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) staging and shroud separation technologies.
- Infrastructure Resilience: The construction of the Chabahar Space Base (scheduled for a Phase 1 opening later in 2026) provides a sovereign launch site that is less vulnerable to the cyber and physical disruption faced by inland military facilities.
Strategic Financial Engineering: Barter and Crypto
As the U.S. targets Iran’s fintech sector, Tehran has shifted toward non-USD settlement methods:
- The “Oil-for-Tech” Barter: China secretly funneled an estimated $8.4 bn to Iran in 2025 through a hidden conduit involving state insurer Sinosure and a financial vehicle called “Chuxin,” swapping crude oil for aerospace infrastructure and passenger aircraft parts.
- Crypto Rails: Platforms like Nobitex are increasingly used to settle small-to-medium procurement contracts for high-precision components, using cross-chain bridges (Polygon to TRON) to obscure the origin of funds.
Leadership Perspective
“The independence Iranians once dreamed of has been realized in various sectors, partly because the country possessed no other option,” noted a state-aligned editorial in the Tehran Times. Hassan Salariyeh, head of the ISA, recently emphasized that the agency aims to make the “private sector” a dominant force, mirroring Western models to further layer the program’s true ownership.
The 2026-2031 Roadmap
Iran’s 10-year space plan targets a cadence of 10 launches per month by 2031, aiming to become a regional commercial hub. For Western regulators, the challenge of 2026 is “Burst Activity”—rapid-fire financial transfers and shipment name changes designed to outpace law enforcement.
As the Chabahar Space Base becomes fully operational, the international community faces a difficult choice: accommodate a sovereign space power or implement a “maximum pressure” regime that risks pushing Iran’s shadow networks deeper into the unregulated digital economy. (Source: Satnews)
11 Feb 26. The End of the Open Range: LEO’s Spectrum Crunch Hits Home. Dispatch from SmallSat Symposium. Coverage and analysis from across the conference, tracking the forces shaping the next phase of the SmallSat market.
With over 14,000 satellites in orbit and filings for hundreds of thousands more flooding the International Telecommunication Union [ITU], the industry has hit a wall. Success is no longer determined by who can launch the fastest. Instead, it depends on who can find a clear frequency to talk back to Earth without being drowned out by the noise.
During the Satellite Spectrum and Regulation Discussion at SmallSat Symposium, a panel that could have provided a dry recitation of legal codes played out like a crisis briefing. Ahsun Murad, CEO of Optimal Satcom, wasted no time laying out the staggering mathematics of the current orbital environment. He pointed to massive filings coming out of China, specifically the CTC-1 and CTC-2 constellations.
Murad noted, “In total their filings exceed 200,000 satellites now.”
That number silenced the room. It breaks the traditional models of orbital management. The spectrum, once a vast and forgiving resource, has become a contested industrial corridor. The panel delivered a clear warning to those building business cases on the assumption of easily securing Ku or Ka-band rights: You are already too late.
The Regulatory Assembly Line
The U.S. government is frantically attempting to modernize its approach before the sky becomes unmanageable. The FCC’s recent Space Month initiative and the proposed Part 100 rules represent the most significant overhaul of satellite licensing in fifty years. The goal is to dismantle the static, paper-heavy Part 25 regime, designed for an era when satellites were bn-dollar monoliths that stayed in one spot for fifteen years, in favor of a system built for speed.
Karl Kensinger, Special Counsel at the FCC’s Space Bureau, described a system under immense pressure. The agency is trying to move from a bespoke, artisan review process to what the research brief describes as a licensing assembly line.
Kensinger admitted that the current regulatory systems “probably aren’t at the right pace—in fact, definitely are not at the right pace.”
Kensinger’s admission highlights a perilous gap between technology and policy. While SpaceX performs 300,000 collision avoidance maneuvers a year, regulators are still working to implement conditional grants that would allow operators to build at risk while waiting for final checks. The new Part 100 framework aims to disaggregate the review process, allowing safety and spectrum reviews to happen on parallel tracks. Yet this transition creates a fresh purgatory for companies already stuck in the queue. (Source: Satnews)
11 Feb 26. The Dumb Pipe Is Dead: Why Physics Is Forcing AI Into Orbit. Dispatch from SmallSat Symposium. Coverage and analysis from across the conference, tracking the forces shaping the next phase of the SmallSat market.
The concept of the satellite as a simple relay, serving as little more than a shiny mirror reflecting data to control rooms in Houston or Darmstadt, is extinct. At the Computer History Museum, the panel on Autonomy and AI in Space Operations delivered a eulogy for the dumb pipe era and a baptism for the intelligent edge. The consensus among the engineers and operators on stage was absolute. We aren’t automating space operations because it is trendy; we are doing it because the physics of the new orbital environment leaves us no choice.
The industry has hit a wall where human reaction times are physically incapable of managing the chaos we have created. The CRASH Clock, which measures the statistical window before a collision becomes inevitable, has collapsed from 121 days in 2018 to just 2.8 days in 2026. Consequently, the human-in-the-loop, rather than being a safety feature, has become a liability.
Survival in the Clam Chowder
Katherine Monson, CEO of Hale SWx, framed the engineering challenge with a visceral analogy that cut through the usual dry technical jargon. Describing the Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) environment where many next-gen constellations operate, she noted that atmospheric drag is no longer a constant variable.
“It’s the difference,” she said, “between swimming through chicken broth and clam chowder.”
In the clam chowder, density spikes caused by solar activity can drag a satellite out of its operational orbit in hours rather than weeks. A ground-based operator waiting for a telemetry pass to upload a maneuver command is already too late. Monson warned, “4x drag is not something you can come back from if you have electronic propulsion and you were not already orbit-raising before the drag is heating up.”
This scenario represents the killer app for orbital AI. It isn’t about generating poetry; it implies a satellite sensing the weather and firing thrusters instantly to survive. Monson noted the goal is for satellites to utilize very simple logic trains to orbit-raise always when conditions degrade, without asking or waiting for permission.
The Efficiency Guillotine
Physics drives the survival requirement, but economics drives adoption. Ian Canning, CEO of Eutelsat Network Solutions, offered a brutal look at the mathematics of mega-constellations. Eutelsat has aggressively automated its fleet operations, a move that has decimated the traditional mission control headcount.
Canning revealed the scale of this shift: “Plan for 50-plus operators down to five.”
This reduction is not mere cost-cutting; it marks the only way to scale. You cannot hire 50 operators for every 100 satellites when you are launching thousands. However, Canning admitted that the transition creates a trust gap with legacy customers who still find comfort in a crowded control room. When Eutelsat pitched this lean, automated model to government clients, “they completely dismissed our ability to manage that number of satellites with that number of people although we’ve been doing it for three years.”
Breaking the Fairing
Perhaps the most radical engineering vision came from Joe Landon of Rendezvous Robotics, which is utilizing autonomy to break aerospace’s most fundamental constraint: the rocket fairing. For sixty years, everything put in space has had to fold up like an expensive tent to fit inside a cylinder.
Landon argued, “Everything we’ve ever sent to space has had to fit into a rocket. That’s what we’re trying to change.”
His solution involves launching stacks of flat, modular tiles that use autonomy to self-assemble in space into massive structures. Such structures will include antennas and power generation systems far larger than anything a rocket could carry monolithically. This is a technical breakthrough in its purest form, using software to cheat the limits of hardware. Landon also pushed back against the instinct to over-regulate these interactions before they even exist. When pressed on standards for these autonomous agents, he countered, “Maybe we don’t need standards.” He pointed to terrestrial agents that negotiate protocols in real-time, suggesting a future where satellites handshake and coordinate without a pre-written rulebook.
The Verification Trap
The lingering question in the room concerned verification. How do you trust a neural network with a bn-dollar asset? Alan Campbell, a Principal Solutions Architect at AWS, argued for a pragmatic, layered approach to trust, which he called the “on the tin test.” Campbell insisted that every autonomous agent must have a verifiable signature. He summarized the logic simply: “if it’s not what it says in the tin, stop.” He described a shift where operators build instrumentation directly into the agent-to-agent logic to monitor performance in real-time. This is critical because AI models now upgrade at breathtaking rates. An algorithm that worked yesterday might behave differently after a morning update. The engineering challenge is building a wrapper that ensures a consistent output even as the model evolves.
The Integration Task
The industry is moving past the shiny object phase of AI. As Ghonhee Lee of Katalyst Space noted, “The groundbreaking research has been done for us.” The task now is integration. Lee, who is preparing to launch a mission to autonomously dock with an unprepared target (the NASA Swift observatory) later this year, dismissed the idea that trust is the primary bottleneck. “I really don’t think trust is the limiting factor here when we’re talking about autonomy,” Lee argued. He pointed to the long history of autonomous cruise missiles as proof that we know how to validate these systems. The message from Mountain View is clear. The bottleneck is no longer technology; it is architecture. We are moving from a world of bespoke, hand-flown satellites to a world of swarms, self-assembling structures, and edge-computing nodes that think for themselves. The dumb pipe is dead, and the smart satellite has arrived just in time to rescue us from the clam chowder. (Source: Satnews)
17 Feb 26. China Develops Compact ‘Starlink-Killer’ Microwave Weapon. Chinese scientists at the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology in Xi’an have developed the “TPG1000Cs,” a compact high-power microwave (HPM) device designed to target satellite constellations such as SpaceX’s Starlink, according to a study.
The device, which is just four meters long and weighs five tons, is reportedly compact enough to be mounted on trucks, warships, planes, or even satellites. It can deliver up to 20 gigawatts of power for one minute, producing roughly 200,000 pulses with consistent performance.
Researchers say the breakthrough was enabled by a specialized liquid insulating material known as Midel 7131.
Microwave weapons could disable a satellite while creating minimal debris and allow for plausible deniability. These weapons work by storing electrical energy and releasing it all at once in a powerful pulse.
Until now, most prototypes for these pulse generators have been large, measuring at least 10 meters long and weighing over 10 tons, making them difficult to deploy on smaller weapons platforms.
For comparison, Russia’s recent Sinus-7 driver weighed about 10 tons, ran for roughly one second, and emitted around 100 pulses per burst.
The development of the device is part of a long-standing effort to build “Starlink-killer” weapons, as Beijing views the Starlink network as a threat to its national security.
Experts in Beijing worry that these satellites could be used against China for reconnaissance and for targeting critical Chinese assets, particularly in the event of a potential invasion of Taiwan.
Shortly after Russia launched its invasion on February 24, 2022, Ukraine requested that Elon Musk activate SpaceX’s Starlink satellites for use in Ukraine.
Musk responded immediately: “Starlink service is now active in Ukraine. More terminals en route.”
With that, Ukraine gained access to critical communication and internet networks. The effective use of SpaceX’s Starlink on the battlefield forced Moscow to develop new tactics for detecting and neutralizing the signals.Top of Form (Source: https://www.sofx.com/)
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Founded in 2017, MatrixSpace is creating the next generation of artificial intelligence enabled sensing solutions to digitize the outdoors beyond the limits of human perception.
The company combines novel artificial intelligence and radar technologies to identify movement and provide context in real-time. MatrixSpace sensors are the smallest, lightest and most portable high-performance systems on the market powered by AI. They deliver actionable insights that empower a broad range of public and private enterprises to protect assets and maintain safety with superior situational awareness.
For the modern, mobile battlespace, MatrixSpace provides both high performance 4D radar and jam-resistant mesh networked communications engineered to perform in the harshest conditions—day or night, in any weather, and in remote, rugged locations. Designed for flexibility, our radar systems can be integrated with tactical vehicles or mounted on structures like buildings, TOCs, or stanchions. Offering 360° coverage, they provide unmatched field-of-view advantages, while low energy consumption allows for solar/battery-powered operation in off-grid environments at twice the duration and a fraction the cost of alternatives. The MatrixSpace AI platform removes clutter and classifies objects, so operators can act confidently without specialized radar expertise.
The MatrixSpace expeditionary radar kit fits in a standard daypack and contains everything needed to deliver actionable detections to an ATAK mobile device in less than 5 mins.
MatrixSpace solutions are designed and developed in the United States, without ITAR export restrictions, manufactured under the highest ISO and IATF standards and rigorously tested for quality, reliability and compliance.
Visit maxtrixspace.com
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————