• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

PENTAGON SUSPENDS HALLIBURTON CONTRACT

May 20, 2004 by

18 May 04. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL reported that the Pentagon says it has suspended nearly $160 million in payments to Halliburton Co. as part of a lingering dispute over the charge for feeding U.S. troops and other personnel in Iraq.

The suspension, which Defense Department officials said was necessary “to protect the Army’s financial interests,” could complicate the provisioning of troops in Iraq if it disrupts payments to Halliburton’s many subcontractors who cook and serve about 300,000 meals a day.

Some Defense officials suggested the financial cost to Halliburton’s Kellogg Brown & Root unit could increase substantially as the two sides feud over the bills for feeding U.S. personnel. KBR has billed the U.S. nearly $800 million for food charges going back to late 2002 at more than 50 dining facilities in Iraq and Kuwait. KBR has been paid for most of it.

KBR was notified of the suspension Thursday, the day before Pentagon auditors deemed the company’s billing system for all its Iraq-related contracts “inadequate” in an audit. KBR has a 10-year, multibillion-dollar contract to provide a host of logistical and support services to the military, including feeding the soldiers, washing their clothes and setting up military bases.

The audit, which hasn’t previously been released, criticizes KBR for “deficiencies” that resulted in billings “not prepared in accordance with applicable law and regulations and contract terms.” In one of its more stinging rebukes, the Defense Contract Audit Agency said KBR had “no documented mechanism” for assuring that its many subcontractors billed properly and kept to their contract terms. The audit agency also said that despite months of work, it still couldn’t determine the “adequacy” of KBR’s own internal auditing abilities.

In a written statement, a Halliburton spokeswoman said the Houston company was working with the Army to resolve “outstanding issues” and said the company believes it will “ultimately be reimbursed for these costs.” The auditors’ analysis was a “flawed interpretation,” according to the company. The statement also said that if the company isn’t paid, it would withhold payments from the subcontractors that actually run the dining halls.

The dispute over food bills goes back to early this year, when Pentagon auditors first alleged that KBR had billed for substantially more meals in the first half of 2003 than were actually served. In March, KBR submitted more documents and argued heatedly that its bills were “proper and reasonable” and should be paid in full.

Last week, in an in-house Defense Department memo, one of the Pentagon’s top auditors concluded that KBR had failed to provide adequate documentation for its food billing. The Pentagon continued to believe the number of meals billed “significantly exceeds the actual head count served since October 2002,” the memo said.

If Pentagon auditors stand by that assessment, the next move would be to disapprove payment, meaning KBR would have to write off at least $160 million. Auditors expect to make that determination by the end of June, at which point the Army Field Support Command would have the final decision. Pentagon officials cautioned that the final sum could be substantially higher once the auditors complete their work.

The auditors said KBR appeared to base its billings on classified estimates of the number of troops that needed to be fed that couldn’t be verified. In a written response to the auditors, KBR said this conclusion was “not only unsubstantiated but also premature.”

In the last two quarters, Halliburton recorded $76 million of profit on Iraq-related work on $4.3 billion in revenue. On its Army support contract, Halliburton earns a 1% profit on allowable expenses and then could get an additional 2% performance award.

The continued billing dispute appears likely to sow further unrest among KBR’s subcontractors, many of whom have had to skimp for long stretches. Paul Morrell, presi

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    January 26, 2023
    Read more
  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    January 20, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    January 20, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT