Qioptiq logo Raytheon Global MilSatCom

PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

03 Jul 13. Defence Committee. Evidence Session – FUTURE ARMY 2020. Wednesday 10 July 2013
At 2.30 pm. The Grimond Room, Portcullis House (venue subject to change)
Witnesses:
* Lieutenant General Sir Adrian Bradshaw KCB OBE, Commander Land Forces
* Major General Kevin Abraham, Director General, Army Reform
* Major General Ranald Munro, Deputy Commander Land Forces (Reserves)
This is the second evidence session for this inquiry.

03 Jul 13. The Defence Committee announced a new inquiry into the protections and obligations—ensuring legality and legitimacy—for operational and deployed UK Armed Forces personnel. This inquiry is the first of a series of inquiries which have evolved from our inquiry Towards the next Defence and Security Review. These inquiries will cover a number of significant strands which have emerged from our inquiry which the Committee believe would benefit from further Defence Committee consideration. Recent judgments by the Supreme Court, Coroners and others have raised a variety of legal, ethical, risk and human rights issues. In speaking about future contingency operations, General Sir Peter Wall said: There will be an expectation in some circles in society that the sort of zero risk culture that is understandably sought in many other walks of life ought to be achievable on the battlefield, and whilst we have certainly understood and bounded the threats and risks in the Afghan theatre—which is as you know extremely demanding in just about every facet—it will be interesting to see how this plays out in a fast moving crisis where we are required to deploy at short notice with a fraction of the understanding that we have developed about the situation, the ground and the people in the Helmand valley.[1] The Committee wishes to examine:
* The legal protections and obligations applying to UK Armed Forces personnel (regular and reservist) when deployed in the UK or abroad in UK-only or coalition operations;
* The effects of the developing concepts and doctrines of ‘lawfare’ and ‘universal jurisdiction’;
* the judicial development of Duty of Care concepts and of domestic UK law and claims of negligence, on UK operational decision making processes and arrangements for recording decisions and events by operational commanders.
In this context, the Committee wishes to consider what changes may be necessary to the current MoD legal framework and processes to accommodate the particular position of UK Armed Forces at war and when deployed in conflict situations or in peacekeeping and the changing tactical forms of future conflicts. The Committee will make recommendations to inform the continued operation of the UK Armed Forces Covenant and the development of the next Strategic Defence and Security Review.
The Committee would welcome written evidence to this inquiry. This should be sent to the Clerk of the Defence Committee by Friday 18 October 2013.
SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE SHOULD:
* If possible, be provided electronically in MS Word or Rich Text format by e-mail to defcom@parliament.uk. If submitted by e-mail or e-mail attachment, a letter should also be sent validating the e-mail. The letterhead should contain your full postal address and contact details. If you have any queries on the submission of evidence contact Christine Randall, Senior Committee Assistant, tel: 0207 219 6872, email: randallc@parliament.uk .
* Begin with a one page summary if it is longer than six pages
* Have numbered paragraphs
* Avoid the use of colour or expensive-to-print material.
Submissions can also be sent by post to Defence Committee, House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA.
Individuals and organisations interested in submitting written evidence to the Committee may find the Commons: Guide for Witnesses particularly useful.
PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT:
* Material already published elsewhere should not form the basis of a submission, but may be referred to within written evidence, in which case a hard copy of the pub

Back to article list