Sponsored by Bertin Exensor
www.exensor.com
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
09 Oct 24. U.S., Allies Focus on Partnerships in Iceland Amid Rapid Change in Region. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, Jr., met with fellow defense chiefs from across the Arctic in Keflavik, Iceland, today as part of the focus among the U.S. and its allies’ continued partnership in ensuring peace and security in the rapidly evolving region.
In addition to the U.S. and Iceland, senior military officers representing Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden gathered as part of this year’s Arctic Chiefs of Defense meeting to discuss regional situational awareness and opportunities for further collaboration.
“The goal is to enhance our domain awareness and maneuver building in the Arctic,” Brown said. “The U.S. commitment is to secure the Arctic, uphold international law and support our NATO allies.”
This year’s meeting marks Brown’s first time attending the forum as chairman. During the visit, Brown also met bilaterally with his counterparts from Sweden and Norway.
The forum is being held for the first time since the Defense Department released its 2024 Arctic Strategy in July which lays out the U.S. military’s approach amid rapid geophysical and geopolitical change in the region.
The U.S. has long recognized the Arctic as a linchpin to homeland defense. During the Cold War, the Arctic served as an avenue of approach for Soviet bombers and missiles in the event of an attack on the U.S.
Competition in the Arctic has grown exponentially in recent decades, due in part to the thawing of once ice-choked sea lanes brought on by a warming climate, further opening avenues of approach.
The warmer waters also provide access to rich energy and mineral deposits and create potential for disputes about fishing rights as migration patterns shift.
The 2024 strategy notes that the increasing impacts of climate change in the Arctic in addition to increased activity by Russia and China in the region have introduced a new and more dynamic security environment in the Arctic.
Russia, which accounts for a broad swath of Arctic Ocean coastline has increasingly sought to extend its influence in the region.
China, while not an Arctic nation, has also increasingly sought to extend its influence in the region in its long-term planning and to take advantage of regional resources.
The DOD strategy also highlights the increasing collaboration in the region between Russia and China across multiple instruments of regional power, including through joint military exercises in the region.
“We are seeing more and more activity where Russia and are working together, and the Arctic is the most recent area we’re seeing,” Brown said. “It’s something we all need to be paying attention to.”
In response to these challenges, the blueprint lays out steps to enhance the Joint Force’s Arctic capabilities through investments in sensors, intelligence and information sharing capabilities. It also prioritizes engagement with regional allies and partners in order to strengthen integrated deterrence and shared security.
Brown said the goals laid out in the strategy include a secure Arctic that fosters global and regional prosperity and a focus on integration and leveraging the military strength and regional expertise of Arctic allies. The strategy also calls engaging in dialogue with allies and indigenous communities.
The chairman added that the U.S. remains focused on deterring any malign activities including Russia’s modernization of capabilities that pose risks to the allied territories and interests, China’s growing influence in the region and the increasing cooperation between the two countries. (Source: U.S. DoD)
09 Oct 24. Langley Emphasizes Partnership with African Nations. The U.S. strategy on the continent of Africa is firmly rooted in a whole-of-government approach that emphasizes listening to allies and partners, said Marine Corps Gen. Michael Langley in a recent interview.
Langley, the commander of U.S. Africa Command, said that while there is a security aspect to almost every challenge in Africa, anything his command does has to be in concert with diplomats and development experts at the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
It must also be done in consultation with nations on the continent. “They will decide how to address their challenges, and their way ahead to be able to leverage their opportunities,” the general said. “Those efforts must be African-led, and we’ll see what we can do to help them achieve shared objectives and shared goals for stability.”
Africa is a huge and diverse continent, and strategy must be flexible to embrace all the differences. The countries of West Africa each saw the use of a whole-of-government approach, but each with different nuances, Langley said. They worked “to address some of the instabilities in some previously ungoverned regions, and working with civil society, working with the local governance to be able to increase growth in the economy, reducing violence or conflict, or building resilience to changing weather patterns,” he said.
A number of the West African countries saw that with violent extremist organizations, the most enduring solution would be interdicting them from happening in the first place, the general said.
An example comes from the nomadic Fulani people who — for centuries — have moved herds to pastures. But with the burgeoning populations of Africa, this movement stokes conflict with the farmers who own the land. “The Fulani herds are stressed, but also the farmers crop yields are reduced,” Langley said. “Climate change plays a part in this, and scarcity breeds conflict.
“USAID and the development programs in these local communities came up with a solution of vaccinating herds and trying new methods of farming that are resistant to some of the effects of climate change,” he continued. “Those are positive programs that reduce conflict. That’s the solution. That’s the intervention.”
The challenges in Africa are complex and may require years to address. Patience is often in short supply, and this may contribute to pressures on governments. “That’s what you have around these coup d’etat countries,” the general said.
The militaries in those countries saw the military age youth in these regions “taking and accepting this false ideology of Islamic extremists and becoming jihadists and causing instability and preying upon the rest of the populations in these areas,” Langley said. In countries where there have been recent coup d’etats, the militaries thought the sitting government was not doing enough, so they assumed the governmental role.
“Those are the ill effects of those layered threats that galvanizes instability across time and exacerbates the growth of those on the other side of these organizations that stokes even more instability across that region,” the general said. “We have seen modicums of success right in the Lake Chad region.”
In that area, USAID helped build some stabilization programs, which allowed the governments to go into those areas and stop the recruitment into jihadist organizations, Langley said. The governments also funded education programs and provided economic infusions that helped stabilize the region. “How do we integrate our activities and investments together with the lead of that country, to be able to do stabilization operations?” the general said.
He is seeing this process work in Somalia. In Somalia, the leaders have the will to build a credible stabilization force, Langley said. African nations are helping train the Somali military and they are achieving results.” The people have started believing in the federal government of Somalia and their local governance,” he said.” This reinforces success. There’s that proof of principle and proof of concepts that the people believe in.”
So, after the liberation of a particular Somali area from al-Shabaab, the government works quickly to bring in services for the local governance and the local leadership being accountable for stabilization efforts, the general said. “That model works, but it does take time to get full buy-in by the community,” he said.
People everywhere are impatient, and people want to see this process work faster. “When it’s not working fast enough, that’s an opportunity for malign activities through the information space,” he said. Misinformation and disinformation are problems, Langley said.
“It’s an opportunity for malign actors to scapegoat,” he said. “These actors stoke instability and disbelief in the sitting government.”
“You have to have security in order for the economy to improve,” Langley said. “That’s a conundrum. So, it’s a continuous investment in helping these countries lead their way out of it.”
Countries like Burkina Faso, Togo, Benin and even Ghana have to deal with this. “They all call it something different, but they are all together,” said Langley. “But each one, it’s subtly different too. It’s not all about kinetics. It’s not all about building up your own your military. These countries understand that.”
And again, this takes time. “Part of the attraction of a country like China or Russia is the fact that they can do something quick,” Langley said. He also added that they can bring in a lot of money and Russian mercenaries.
Across Africa, China and Russia are “exploitative where possible and coercive as necessary,” the general said.
They have proved this in Central Africa Republic, Libya, Mali and Burkina Faso. They have so far been unsuccessful in replicating the U.S. security construct offered to countries that want to build institutional capacity in their militaries. ” want to replicate what we do in international military education and training,” he said. “They want to replicate what we do as far as our security cooperation initiatives, whether it be materials or equipment, or how they try to do advise and assist.”
Langley recently participated in the first African chiefs of defense conference on the continent of Africa in Botswana. It was a chance for almost 40 chiefs of defense “to share ideas, address challenges and talk about possibilities of working together, especially in regional constructs,” Langley said. “What we did is encouraged everyone to lay out the challenges across the African continent on the table, … and they started putting some things out on the table that were kind of uncomfortable, but they still wanted to talk about it and start solution sets on their own with input from other regions. They were discussing their regional challenges, or even their country challenges, and getting them to address the issues together for an African solution.”
“That exchange of ideas Botswana was very beneficial for everybody there,” he continued. “It was not just terrorism — we did talk about disinformation. We talked protecting networks and other domains. We talked about the opportunity to go forward that would enhance their security and … as chiefs of defense, how they fold into civilian-led governments and give their best military advice to address the challenges in society.”
The United States has interests throughout Africa, and how the nation pursues and protects these interests varies across the continent. The one constant, Langley said, is the approach is partner-centric. “We don’t want it to be misunderstood of our overall intentions,” he said. “This is all about goodwill. This is all about us, wanting to see our African partners make it, because the future is bright for this continent, and it’s going to be an investment over time, in deepening our partnerships and building partnership and capacity. It’s going to take a unity of effort.” (Source: U.S. DoD)
01 Oct 24. Defense tech companies can apply for Pentagon loans starting next year. The Pentagon announced its first direct lending tool Monday, offering loans to U.S. companies that make in-demand defense component technologies.
Nearly $1bn has been set aside for the Defense Department to award direct loans ranging from $10m to $150m.
The Defense Department hopes the effort will help companies fund the construction and equipment needed to scale production across 31 technology categories deemed critical to U.S. national security. That includes areas like space launch, microelectronics fabrication, edge computing and quantum sensing.
“DOD now has proven financial tools to enable ms of dollars of investment in national security priorities at limited cost to the department and the taxpayer,” Defense Department Office of Strategic Capital, or OSC, Director Jason Rathje said in a statement.
The effort is geared toward businesses who need flexible financing options in order to attract additional investment and “unlock growth opportunities,” OSC said in a LinkedIn post Monday.
For a company to receive an OSC loan, it must meet certain eligibility requirements established by DOD and the Office of Management and Budget to make sure projects are economically viable, low-risk for the government and mature enough to quickly enter the commercial market.
The office will accept initial applications between January 2 and February 3. Following review, OSC will notify firms if their projects were selected to move to the next phase of the application process.
OSC set up shop in December 2022 to help the Pentagon steer private capital toward the technologies and supply chains that are most important to DOD and broader U.S. economic security. The office is distinct from other department initiatives in that it focuses on investments in components rather than capabilities, and on lending funds rather than spending them.
Congress gave OSC lending authority as part of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed into law in December. OSC released its inaugural investment strategy in March, creating a framework for the lending program that it expects to refresh on a regular basis as threats change and technology advances. The document outlined 12 initial priority areas, including biotechnology, quantum science, microelectronics, space-enabled services and sensor hardware.
The office’s strategy is to partner with other government agencies to offer cost-effective tools that incentivize private capital firms to invest in the technology DOD needs.
“As used by OSC in collaboration with federal partners, these financial tools will enable capital providers to invest in critical technologies that would otherwise be less attractive because the cost of capital is too high, the timelines for repayment or liquidity are too long, or the technical challenges are too risky for a nascent commercial market alone,” OSC said in its strategy. (Source: C4ISR & Networks)
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Founded in 1987, Exensor Technology is a world leading supplier of Networked Unattended Ground Sensor (UGS) Systems providing tailored sensor solutions to customers all over the world. From our Headquarters in Lund Sweden, our centre of expertise in Network Communications at Communications Research Lab in Kalmar Sweden and our Production site outside of Basingstoke UK, we design, develop and produce latest state of the art rugged UGS solutions at the highest quality to meet the most stringent demands of our customers. Our systems are in operation and used in a wide number of Military as well as Homeland Security applications worldwide. The modular nature of the system ensures any external sensor can be integrated, providing the user with a fully meshed “silent” network capable of self-healing. Exensor Technology will continue to lead the field in UGS technology, provide our customers with excellent customer service and a bespoke package able to meet every need.
A CNIM Group Company
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-