• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

NEWS IN BRIEF – USA

November 15, 2014 by

13 Nov 14. Secretary of Defense Hagel Announces Nuclear Force Reforms. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced a comprehensive action plan to reform to the nuclear enterprise and called for additional critical investments in sustainment as well as measures to address longstanding cultural issues that have hurt the morale of the nuclear force. In February of this year, following a series of events involving the nation’s nuclear forces and their leadership, Hagel directed both an internal and external review of the entire Defense Department nuclear enterprise. The reviews concluded that while our nuclear forces are currently meeting the demands of the mission with dedication, significant changes are required to address systemic problems that could undermine the safety, security and effectiveness of the force in the future. Together, the two reviews identified more than 100 recommendations to improve the nuclear deterrent forces. They focus on several key areas, including: oversight, investment and personnel and training and their recommendations range from acquisition investments to cultural challenges that will take time to see through.These investments will cost several billion dollars over the five-year defense spending program in addition to ongoing modernization requirements identified in last year’s budget submission. The Department will prioritize funding on actions that improve the security and sustainment of the current force, ensures that modernization of the force remains on track, and that address shortfalls, which are undermining the morale of the force. The external report, a summary of the internal report, a fact sheet on implementation and the secretary’s message to the force can be found at the following link: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/.(Source: US DoD)

13 Nov 14. South Korea is claiming BAE owes it $43m in punitive costs over a recently canceled F-16 upgrade program, and BAE is taking the Asian country’s military acquisition arm to court in order to block those charges. At the core of the lawsuit is a disagreement about who is to blame for unexpected jumps in cost for the F-16 upgrade program. Military officials in Korea have claimed the US government added about US $470m and BAE Systems about $280m in costs that were not part of the original agreement. South Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) is holding BAE responsible for those costs; BAE, in turn, argues that it had no say in those cost increases, instead putting the blame at the feet of the US government. “DAPA is now impermissibly seeking to require [BAE] to pay $43,250,000 under the April 2014 Letter of Guarantee,” the lawsuit, filed Thursday by BAE’s US arm in Maryland District Court, reads. That $43m is a fee that was built into the F-16 contract in case BAE broke its agreement. But BAE is arguing DAPA is punishing the company for not being able to convince the US government that the extra costs created by government requirements for more testing were unnecessary. In BAE’s eyes, that simply isn’t fair. ‘DAPA bases its claim for payment not on an alleged violation of the terms of the guarantee, but on BAE TSS’s [Technology Solution & Service’s] inability to force the US government contractor for the portion of the work not otherwise performed directly by the US government,’ the lawsuit continues. DAPA canceled the F-16 upgrade program on Nov. 5. If it had stayed on track, the $1.7bn contract would have upgraded 134 KF-16 fighters for Korea, including avionics and radar improvements. The lawsuit was first reported by Flight Global. BAE declined to comment in detail, as is common with legal actions. ‘In response to suggestions of legal action against BAE Systems from the Korean government, the company has asked a US federal court to rule that it does not owe any monies in connection with the F-16 upgrade program,’ a company spokesman wrote in an emailed statement. ‘We are unable to comment further.’ A Pentagon spokesman decli

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow SOF Week 2023

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • Ajax vehicles on course for new delivery times.

    March 20, 2023
    Read more
  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    March 17, 2023
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    March 17, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT