• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

NEWS IN BRIEF – USA

November 1, 2014 by

31 Oct 14. F-35 Heading Toward Block Buy. Every year, the Pentagon and its corporate partners hash out contracts for individual low-rate initial production (LRIP) lots of the F-35 joint strike fighter. If the man running the program has his say, those days are numbered. With the negotiations over LRIP 8 at a conclusion, Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan, the head of the F-35 joint program office, is planning on negotiating LRIP 9 and 10 together. And come LRIP 11, he wants a whole new model of procurement in place. “By next summer we will put out a request for proposal on LRIP 11 jets,” Bogdan told reporters Thursday. “That RFP will ask Lockheed to do a block buy for our partners. At least, that is my intention.” It’s not the first time Bogdan has raised the idea of a block buy. He first publically mentioned the idea at July’s Farnborough International Airshow, indicating it was still a ways off. But Thursday marked the first time he has placed a public stake in the ground as to when that could begin, and why it makes fiscal sense. A number of partner nations have already committed to large procurements of the fifth-generation stealthy jet, so bundling their orders together is just logical, Bogdan said. “If you were to take their requirements and put them together, you could actually have a substantial number of airplanes, starting in LRIP 11 and spanning LRIP 11, 12 and 13, bought as a block of airplanes, almost as if it was a multi-year [buy] for the US,” he said. Participation in a block buy would be open to all international partners or foreign military sales customers who are interested, and Bogdan said he expects ‘substantial savings’ for those involved. But while a block buy could benefit international partners, the US would not be able to participate in such a buy due to acquisition rules barring a multi-year procurement until the jet enters full-rate production. In other words, the United States would be paying more per F-35 model than a country such as, for argument’s sake, South Korea, which has pledged to procure 40 F-35A fighters through foreign military sales. (Source: Defense News)

30 Oct 14. A-10 retirement restrictions imperil F-35A IOC for USAF. Key Points:
* The USAF’s F-35A fleet might not be operationally deployable by August 2016 as planned
* Experienced A-10 maintenance personnel were expected to comprise the majority of new F-35 maintainers, but lawmakers are working to block the legacy aircraft’s retirement
The US Air Force’s (USAF’s) goal to make its new fleet of Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter combat aircraft operationally deployable in August 2016 has been imperilled by lawmakers’ efforts to halt the service’s plan to retire its Cold War-era Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt close air support (CAS) aircraft fleet, the Pentagon’s F-35 programme manager said on 30 October. “Up until recently, 2016 IOC [initial operating capability] was looking pretty good,” Lieutenant General Christopher Bogdan told a handful of reporters at the Pentagon. However, the USAF now expects a shortage of fully trained maintenance personnel because the A-10 maintainers it had planned to move into F-35 work may have to remain with the legacy programme. A combination of new and experienced maintainers was expected to complete F-35 maintenance training to meet the need for 1,100 personnel at the outset of IOC. The USAF had planned to retire the A-10 and anticipated that many of the experienced maintainers would come from the A-10 career field, the general said. “Now they’ve come to me and said, ‘We don’t think we can get rid of the A-10, and if we don’t get rid of the A-10, you don’t get experienced maintainers,'” he added. The US House of Representatives in June voted, via a measure that would prohibit the Department of Defense from using money to retire any A-10 aircraft, to block the plan to retire the A-10 fleet as part of its fiscal year 2015 (FY 2015) defence spending legislation. The measure was off

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow SOF Week 2023

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    March 24, 2023
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    March 24, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    March 24, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT