Sponsored by Bertin Exensor
www.exensor.com
———————————————————————————————————————
Military And Security Developments
Apr 14.
KEY DEVELOPMENTS
- RECRUITMENT: Reportedly, Russia’s recruitment rate in early 2026 was significantly lower than in 2025, likely indicating an increased pressure in replacing and reinforcing Russian units, though the Kremlin will likely find the personnel
- STRIKES: Recent reports indicate that Russian long-range drone operators have begun targeting Ukrainian air defence crews, reflecting Russia’s continued efforts to experiment with strike tactics and sustain pressure on air defences
- HUNGARY: The incoming Hungarian government will likely maintain a cautious stance towards Ukraine, though regional tensions will likely decrease
- FORECAST: A unilateral Russian ceasefire in Ukraine over Orthodox Easter (which was observed on 11-12 April) was marred by thousands of reported violations, underscoring the fragile nature of temporary pauses in fighting in the Russo-Ukrainian war
- RECRUITMENT: Reportedly, Russia’s recruitment rate in early 2026 was significantly lower than in 2025, likely indicating an increased pressure in replacing and reinforcing Russian units. On 12 April, German Institute for International and Security Affairs economist Janis Kluge published an assessment of Russian recruitment rates based on an analysis of certain Russian federal subjects’ budgets. The study shows that in Q1 2026, Russia recorded a 20% decrease in recruitment compared to Q1 2025. The Russian authorities continue to assert that recruitment targets are ahead of their plan. However, the figures (despite data inconsistencies) likely indicate that recruitment efforts in 2025 yielded better results, despite regions having reintroduced or increased lucrative sign-on bonuses over the past year in a bid to increase recruitment (see Sibylline Ukraine Update – 17 February 2026).
- RECRUITMENT: While these trends underline the growing pressure the war is placing on Russia’s military recruitment efforts, Russia is highly likely to continue outpacing Ukraine in terms of recruitment and will find ways to sustain its attritional war effort. Russian recruitment levels and their impact on offensive effectiveness cannot be assessed in isolation. Ukrainian manpower challenges, driven in part by a demographic disadvantage, are also influencing the war’s trajectory. Russia will likely rely on alternative recruitment strategies to offset losses partially, such as the enrolment of foreigners via global clandestine networks. We previously assessed that in 2026, the Kremlin would likely experience increased pressure to resort to alternative mechanisms to sustain the war effort (see Sibylline Ukraine Update – 14 October 2025). These alternatives will likely include the deployment of active reservists, in a bid to reduce the long-term economic costs of Russia’s current recruitment strategy based on so-called ‘volunteers’.
- SOUTHERN: Russia continues to prioritise operations in the Huliapole direction (Zaporizhzhia oblast), rather than countering areas where Ukraine has achieved localised tactical successes. Over the past week, a Ukrainian military analyst noted that the Russian command is prioritising offensive operations in the Huliapole direction over defending against Ukrainian attacks in the Oleksandrivka direction (Donetsk oblast). The source claimed that the Russian command likely assesses the latter Ukrainian attacks do not pose a sufficient threat to warrant a reappraisal of its offensive plans along the southern front. Meanwhile, on 12 April, the same analyst reported the redeployment of strategic reserves to the southern frontline, instead of Russia’s priority front in Donetsk oblast. This likely indicates Russia’s willingness to increase its offensive tempo in Zaporizhzhia oblast, particularly towards Orikhiv. However, Russia’s offensive potential in that direction remains constrained due to its forces’ overextension in western Zaporizhzhia oblast. Overall, we have seen very limited movement of Russian units between sectors; this is ordinarily an indication of preparations for a concerted, large-scale offensive effort. As such, this indicates that Ukrainian attacks have possibly delayed Russian spring offensive efforts in the region; we will keep monitoring indicators regarding Russian build-ups.
- SUMY: Following an uptick in Russian offensive activity in Sumy oblast along the border with Russia, Ukrainian forces have carried out localised tactical withdrawals. However, these moves do not indicate a major Russian breakthrough. On 13 April, Ukraine’s 14th Army Corps announced that it had pulled back near Myropilske, located to the east of Sumy City (both Sumy oblast), to avoid heavy casualties following an intensification of Russian attacks. On the same day, Ukrainian OSINT group DeepState reported that Russian forces had advanced near Marine, Myropilske and Novodmytrivka, all located to the east of Sumy City near the border with Russia. Viktor Trehubov, a spokesperson for Ukraine’s military forces, reported that the increase in Russian activity forms part of broader efforts to expand Russian control towards Sumy City. However, the advances remain broadly localised, with Ukrainian tactical withdrawals highly unlikely to indicate a localised collapse at present.
- STRIKES: Recent reports indicate that Russian long-range drone operators have begun targeting Ukrainian air defence crews, reflecting Russia’s continued efforts to experiment with strike tactics and sustain pressure on air defences. According to an advisor to the Ukrainian defence minister, Russian forces recently used a co-ordinated drone attack against a Ukrainian mobile fire group. While the unit was intercepting a Shahed drone, a second guided drone struck the crew directly. Together with the uptick in day-time drone strikes, these trends likely indicate an effort to increase pressure on Ukrainian air defenders, as opposed to pressure on the overall air defence network to degrade air defence munitions. This would likely support Russia’s wider attritional strategy, which is focused on inflicting casualties and outlasting Ukrainian forces.
- STRIKES: Russian strikes continue to have a heavy toll on Ukraine’s civilian population and infrastructure. On 10 April, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) reported that Russian short-range drone strikes were the war’s deadliest weapons in March, killing 66 and injuring 369 civilians. Long-range weapons (missiles and drones) remained the primary cause of overall civilian casualties (61 killed; 448 injured). Meanwhile on 8 April, a World Health Organization (WHO) official reported that the number of Russian attacks on medical and pharmaceutical warehouses tripled in 2025 compared to 2024. The official underlined the highly detrimental impact of this trend on Ukraine’s healthcare system, reducing the availability of medical equipment and medicine. We continue to assess that targeting densely populated areas and civilian infrastructure in Ukraine forms part of Moscow’s strategy to exacerbate war fatigue within Ukraine’s population and undermine support for the continuation of the war.
- STRIKES: Ukraine has continued long-range attacks against Russian oil infrastructure over the past week. Early on 10 April, Ukrainian forces struck two oil and gas drilling platforms in the northern Caspian Sea. Previously on 9 April, a Ukrainian strike targeted an oil pumping station in Russia’s Krasnodar krai. Meanwhile, on 10 April, Bloomberg reported that Russia’s key Novorossiysk Black Sea oil export terminal (Krasnodar krai) resumed crude oil loadings after several days of disruption caused by recent Ukrainian strikes. In recent weeks, Kyiv has doubled down on its strategy to target key oil export hubs in western Russia, in a bid to prevent Moscow from capitalising on global energy instability caused by the Israel-US-Iran war.
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
- HUNGARY: The incoming Hungarian government will likely maintain a cautious stance towards Ukraine, though regional tensions will likely decrease markedly. On 12 April, the centre-right Tisza party secured a two-thirds supermajority after defeating the ruling Fidesz party. Péter Magyar, who is set to replace Ukraine-sceptic Viktor Orbán as prime minister, has signalled that the Hungarian government will drop its opposition to the EU’s EUR 90 billion (over USD 106 billion) loan to Ukraine. However, Magyar noted that he wants Hungary to opt out of participating in the loan because of his country’s own strained socio-economic health conditions – an indication of the limits of the incoming Magyar government’s support for Ukraine.
- HUNGARY: Even if Magyar lifts the Hungarian veto, we assess that there are several factors likely to undermine the disbursement of the loan in the near term. Magyar has claimed that a decision on the matter could take place before the formation of a new government, which he said could take place as early as 5 May. However, ultimately it remains unclear whether this will be an immediate priority for Magyar before he assumes the role of prime minister or in the early stages of a Tisza government. In early March, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico pledged to block the loan if Orbán lost the election and Ukraine failed to restore Russian oil supplies through the Druzhba pipeline. Ukraine has said that the pipeline could be operational, but not fully repaired, by the end of April, indicating that the dispute will realistically continue.
- HUNGARY: While Magyar’s recent comments mark a departure from the Russia-friendly Orbán, we assess that the incoming prime minister will likely seek a pragmatic approach to relations with Moscow (particularly regarding energy). On 13 April, Magyar stated that he considers Russia to be a threat, but said his country will continue to purchase Russian oil while diversifying suppliers. The Tisza party had pledged in its manifesto to eliminate Hungary’s dependence on Russian energy by 2035. Separately, Magyar also indicated that he supports the removal of sanctions on Russian energy, which will possibly present challenges for the EU in seeking to end its dependence on Russian energy over the long term. At the same time, Magyar’s comments could realistically indicate a continued pattern of Hungarian opposition to punitive measures against Russia, especially if future sanctions packages target Russian energy.
- AID: The IMF and World Bank’s Spring Meetings are taking place in Washington DC (US) between 13 and 18 April as external funding shortfalls increase budgetary pressures for Ukraine. On 7 April, the Ukrainian parliament approved one of several tax bills aimed at unlocking the next tranche of an IMF loan worth USD 8.1 billion after it missed IMF reform targets in late March. According to unspecified Ukrainian lawmakers, the Ukrainian delegation to the meetings will possibly attempt to renegotiate an unpopular proposal to charge value-added tax (VAT) on self-employed contractors, a requirement for unlocking the IMF funding. While it is possible that the approval of one of the tax bills will moderately improve Ukraine’s position in negotiations with the IMF, lagging reforms will likely undermine international investor confidence over the longer term. In turn, this will possibly weaken investor interest in Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. For further analysis on external financing for Ukraine, see Sibylline Situation Update Brief – 26 March 2026.
FORECAST
CEASEFIRE: A unilateral Russian ceasefire in Ukraine over Orthodox Easter (which was observed over 11-12 April) was marred by thousands of reported violations, underscoring the fragile nature of temporary pauses in fighting in the Russo-Ukrainian war. During the ceasefire, the overall intensity of fighting and the number of assaults reduced to a third of the typical weekly averages. Notably, neither side undertook any long-range deep strikes. The Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) nevertheless recorded 6,558 violations during the truce, which ran from 1600hrs on 11 April to 0000hrs on 13 April (both local time). Despite the reported contraventions, the Russian MoD said the intensity of artillery and combat operations along the front line was reduced during the daytime of the ceasefire period. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s General Staff of the Armed Forces reported 10,721 violations over the declared ceasefire.
Russia’s announcement of a pause in hostilities over Orthodox Easter was highly likely aimed at garnering favour with the US should trilateral negotiations with Ukraine restart in the coming weeks. The onset of the Israel-US-Iran war on 28 February effectively stalled peace talks to resolve the Russo-Ukrainian war, given that the US was the principal mediator. Although a ceasefire was reached in the Israel-US-Iran war overnight on 7-8 April, it remains uncertain if and when trilateral Russia-Ukraine-US talks could resume as the Middle East crisis remains a higher geopolitical priority for the Trump administration. Nevertheless, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov expressed hope on 8 April that the US would now have more time and bandwidth to resume trilateral negotiations.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had repeatedly pushed for a ceasefire and ‘energy truce’ in recent days, though Russia effectively dismissed the prospect of a temporary pause in fighting until 9 April. We previously assessed that Russia is highly unlikely to perceive a ceasefire to be in its current strategic interests unless it believes a pause in hostilities could bolster its position in negotiations with the US. Notably, Russia rejected a proposal from Zelensky on 11 April to extend the Orthodox Easter ceasefire – indicating a lack of interest in longer-form ceasefires. Peskov stated on 12 April that Moscow wants a ‘sustainable peace’, which he said is only possible once Russia secures its interests and achieves its long-standing goals. Peskov’s comments reinforce our assessment that Russia’s war objectives remain largely unchanged and uncompromising under current geopolitical, military and economic conditions. Instead, the Russian leadership highly likely views ceasefires as a means to strengthen its diplomatic position, rather than as a means to build trust with Kyiv and facilitate an eventual end to the Russo-Ukrainian war prior to it achieving its military objectives in the Donbas.
The numerous reported violations during the Orthodox Easter ceasefire underscore the low likelihood of a robust cessation of hostilities (let alone a definitive peace deal) in the coming months. Russia and Ukraine remain far removed in their positions on key issues, most crucially territory. Their stances are unlikely to converge fully in the coming months – especially if negotiations remain stalled. Notably, in an interview with Bloomberg published on 10 April, the head of Ukraine’s Presidential Office, Kyrylo Budanov, stated that while no final decision on territory had been made, the parties involved in the talks now ‘clearly’ understand ‘the limits of what is acceptable’. Although the trilateral negotiations failed to produce a significant breakthrough towards peace, the talks at least facilitated discussions on a semi-regular basis.
We continue to assess that Ukraine is highly likely to face greater pressure than Russia to make concessions in negotiations, should said talks resume in a trilateral format. On 10 April, Zelensky shared his assessment that the spring and summer months will be challenging for Ukraine both diplomatically and politically, as well as on the battlefield. The Ukrainian president stated that the Trump administration’s attention will turn to November’s midterm elections this summer. As such, the US will possibly intensify pressure on Ukraine to accept unfavourable peace terms in an attempt to reach a peace deal before Trump’s attention is otherwise diverted to domestic issues. Alternatively, the lack of tangible progress towards peace will possibly prompt the US to withdraw from efforts to end the war over the coming months. For further analysis. (Source: Sibylline)
13 Apr 26. Japan’s Terra Drone Invests in Ukraine’s Amazing Drones and Launches ‘Terra A1’ – a $3K Interceptor. Terra Drone Corporation, a Japan-based drone and Urban Air Mobility technology company, has announced a capital and business alliance with Ukraine’s Amazing Drones LLC, a developer and manufacturer of interceptor drones.
The agreement includes a strategic investment made through Terra Drone’s subsidiary, Terra Inspectioneering. Through this partnership, Terra Drone aims to strengthen its presence in Ukraine while accelerating global expansion in the defence sector.
As part of the collaboration, the companies will jointly launch a new interceptor drone, the “Terra A1.” In addition to expanding local operations, Terra Drone plans to leverage the technical expertise developed in Ukraine—particularly under real combat conditions—to advance practical applications and scale its international business.
Terra AI
The announcement comes amid a rapidly evolving global security landscape. Conflicts such as the war in Ukraine have demonstrated the growing importance of low-cost, mass-deployable drones, which are reshaping traditional military strategies. Increasingly, inexpensive drones are being used to neutralize high-value weapons, fundamentally altering defence economics. This shift has led to a new guiding principle: countering low-cost threats with equally cost-effective solutions.
Recognizing this transformation, Terra Drone formally entered the defence equipment market in March 2026. The company aims to contribute to building a sustainable, next-generation defence framework by applying its global experience in drone technologies and operations.
Amazing Drones, the recipient of the investment, specializes in interceptor drones designed for rapid deployment in challenging environments where electronic warfare and signal jamming are common. Its technologies and operational expertise, developed through real-world combat scenarios, are key assets that Terra Drone intends to integrate into its own capabilities. The partnership is expected to accelerate the development of effective defence solutions.
The newly introduced Terra A1 drone represents a cost-efficient alternative to traditional interceptor missiles. Designed for speed and scalability, it can reach a maximum speed of 300 km/h and operate within a range of 32 kilometers—surpassing the typical performance of many threat drones. Powered by electric propulsion, it offers low noise and minimal heat signature, enhancing stealth. With a flight time of approximately 15 minutes, the Terra A1 can perform the full cycle of surveillance, target detection, and interception in a single mission.
Looking ahead, Terra Drone plans to expand its portfolio of unmanned systems, including interceptor drones, FPV drones, reconnaissance drones, and unmanned surface vessels. By leveraging its mass-production expertise and global network, the company aims to meet rising international demand for advanced defense technologies. Collaborations with partners across Japan, Europe, and the United States will further support this effort.
Terra Drone views the defence sector as a driver of both technological innovation and economic growth. By combining drone and AI technologies, the company seeks to build a new form of social infrastructure that enhances national security, strengthens industrial competitiveness, and enables civilian applications through technology transfer.
Company leaders emphasized the strategic importance of the partnership. Terra Drone CEO Toru Tokushige highlighted the urgency of developing effective countermeasures against modern aerial threats, while Amazing Drones CEO Maksym Klymenko described the collaboration as a critical step toward scaling production and bringing battlefield-proven innovations to a global market.
Through this alliance, Terra Drone aims to deliver reliable, combat-tested solutions while contributing to global stability and security.
(Source: UAS VISION)
10 Apr 26. Ukrainian drone makers visit Paris looking for co-production deals. More than two dozen Ukrainian defense companies traveled to Paris this week to meet with French counterparts, laying the groundwork for co-production deals in France and seeking to bolster integration with the European defense-industrial base.
French defense firms have been slow to set up joint companies with Ukrainian partners, with just one joint venture created so far, compared to 11 for Germany and five for Spain, said Ihor Fedirko, the chief executive officer of the Ukrainian Council of Defence Industry. He was speaking at a press briefing late Wednesday after a day of meetings organized with French land defense industry group GICAT.
Ukraine has developed unmatched expertise in Europe in drone warfare after four years of fighting Russia’s invasion, coming up with new use cases and doctrine as well as scaling up drone production to millions of units per year. Meanwhile, France is home to some of Europe’s biggest defense firms and is the world’s second-biggest arms exporter.
“We have to establish a win-win strategy with the defense industry of France, to find our best partners,” Fedirko said. “We want to know as well how you produce your products, your production culture, your standards. That’s what you can bring to our industry.”
Ukraine was present with 27 companies, most of them drone makers, while nearly 60 French firms showed up for the day of match making, according to Fedirko. He said some Ukrainian companies would follow up with visits to French manufacturers on Thursday.
Co-producing Ukrainian defense products with strategic partners, on their territory, means an additional flow of equipment to send to the front, said Oleksandr Kamyshin, an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and former minister of strategic industries. He said allied governments buying co-produced kit to donate to Ukraine “is the fastest and the best way how we can support our front line.”
Kamyshin said Ukraine’s industry has historically been integrated “into the East” and now needs to become part of the European defense framework, while Europe’s defense industry will become stronger by integrating capabilities learned and developed in Ukraine.
“We come with our lessons learned,” Kamyshin said. “We offer a model which is definitely beneficial for your country, for your industry, for your economy. And we want to do more together.”
Fedirko said no other European country has a defense industry like that of France, active in deep tech and completely independent, with the French industry strong in aerospace and “classic weaponry.” With France able produce everything from missiles and radars to night-vision equipment, what Ukraine can bring is knowledge, technologies and innovations in the field of drones, he said.
“When we will combine our experience and expertise and your deep technologies, your standards, your production culture, we can establish something pretty new,” Fedirko said.
French companies may announce at least one or two drone joint ventures with Ukrainian partners in the coming weeks, said Clément Requier, GICAT’s director of export and European partnerships. He noted France’s defense industry already works with Ukraine’s industry in formats other than joint ventures.
Ukraine is offering a level of industrial collaboration that wouldn’t have been available five years ago, and is open to sharing what it learned to produce, in the interest of integrating with European industry, according to Kamyshin. The Ukrainian official said in turn he sees strong interest in cooperation from the French side.
Wednesday’s meeting was the fourth between the French and Ukrainian defense industries since July 2023, and the first in France, according to Requier. France often frames cooperation with other countries in terms of delivering stand-alone solutions, and should think more about also being a provider of critical components and equipment, he said.
Ukraine has the expertise it needs, with more than 1,000 companies active in defense, most of them producing unmanned systems, said Kamyshin. He said Ukrainian drones have sunk Russian ships and submarines, saying it “looks like Lego drones work well,” an oblique reference to reported comments by Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger widely seen as dismissive of Ukraine’s drone innovation.
France has deep knowledge and expertise in artificial intelligence, and “we would be happy do to more in that domain,” according to Kamyshin. Ukraine sees France as a strategic partner, and the focus is on promoting collaboration and co-production in France, rather than sales, the special adviser said.
Ukraine in March raised the possibility of sharing battlefield data with partners to train AI models, and Kamyshin said Ukraine would be happy to share datasets with countries with which it starts co-production, and “not only in Ukraine,” with an announcement on partnerships expected on April 13.
With regards to what France can bring to the table, Ukraine could benefit from more sharing of strong standard setting in Europe, said Éloi Delort, public affairs director at Alta Ares, a French defense AI firm. He said France’s Directorate General for Armament puts “a lot of stress” on French companies to secure systems and ensure technology is not getting stolen.
One of Wednesday’s participants, Ukraine’s MOWA Defense, which provides training and advisory services for defense, sees France as a key market, co-founder Fedir Serdiuk said. Operating in France would require a local partner, which the executive says he hopes to have found, with a possible final agreement or at least a letter of intent in coming months.
Ukrainian drone maker eDrone came to Paris looking for new partnerships, chief commercial officer Pavlo Valenchuk said. He cited the example of a French company with radars, a good drone-tracking system and software, “everything to develop a really good system” to protect strategic objects in France, but lacking interceptor drones. “This type of partnership we’re looking for.”
French company SBG Systems, which makes low-cost inertial navigation systems in France that are used by Ukraine in strike drones, is looking to qualify partnerships to relocate some production to Ukraine, CEO Thibault Bonnevie said. Some manufacturing may be difficult to move because it relies on machine tools from Switzerland, with export restrictions for countries in conflict, he said.
SBG is working to enhance feedback on its products from the front line, a key issue in Ukraine because of the fast-evolving battlefield and Russian electronic-warfare, Bonnevie said. The company’s customers are manufacturers rather than the armed forces directly, which means relying on the drone makers for user feedback, something that was “discussed a lot” on Wednesday, the CEO said.
Meeting with Ukrainian companies in Paris was a way to meet potential new partners rather than sign contracts, according to Bonnevie.
“The next step is usually to go visit those companies directly in Ukraine, because there is nothing really happening in Ukraine for European companies without stronger links,” Bonnevie said. Even if discussions center around drones and robots, “there is still a story of humans working together and trust that needs to be built between the companies,” he said. (Source: Defense News)
16 Apr 26. UK Announces Biggest Ever Package of 120,000 Drones for Ukraine. The UK has announced its largest-ever drone support package for Ukraine, committing to deliver at least 120,000 drones in 2026 while boosting economic growth and job creation across the UK.
The announcement coincides with the Defence Secretary’s visit to Berlin to co-chair the 34th Ukraine Defence Contact Group meeting alongside key international partners.
This record-breaking package includes thousands of long-range strike drones, intelligence and reconnaissance systems, logistics drones, and maritime capabilities—all proven in combat on Ukraine’s frontlines. Initial deliveries began earlier this month, marking a rapid rollout of support.
Drones have become central to modern warfare in Ukraine, playing a decisive role in both offensive counterattacks and defensive operations against Russian strikes. In March 2026 alone, Russia launched around 6,500 one-way attack drones—highlighting the escalating scale of aerial warfare.
The investment will primarily benefit UK-based defence companies, including Tekever, Windracers, and Malloy Aeronautics. This is expected to create jobs, strengthen domestic industry, and accelerate innovation in drone technology. The UK’s growing drone sector is seen as vital not only for national security but also for reinforcing Europe’s broader deterrence capabilities.
The drone package forms part of the UK’s wider £3 billion annual military support for Ukraine. Additional commitments include hundreds of thousands of artillery rounds and thousands of air defence missiles.
This initiative follows a new UK-Ukraine defence partnership aimed at countering the global spread of low-cost, high-tech military systems such as drones. It also builds on a £500 million air defence package announced earlier this year, which included funding for interceptor systems and over 1,000 missiles.
Overall, the UK continues to play a leading role in coordinating international military and financial support for Ukraine, working closely with NATO allies to sustain long-term defence efforts.
(Source: UAS VISION)
10 Apr 26. Canada’s ZenaTech to establish C-UAS interceptor production in Ukraine.
Canada’s ZenaTech, Inc. has announced plans to establish a dedicated testing facility in Ukraine and conduct drone testing and operational deployment activities to validate its drone platforms in active threat environments.
“This planned Ukrainian drone testing and deployment will place ZenaTech’s R&D and product validation directly within the world’s most active and operationally demanding drone warfare theatre, enabling real-world testing of its Interceptor P-1 and other drone defence systems,” said the company in a press release. “This future testing facility will be in addition to the company’s previously disclosed plans for initiation of a manufacturing facility in Ukraine, positioning the company for the accelerated development of cost-effective counter-UAS systems for US-allied defense customers worldwide.”
“Ukraine represents an unparalleled testing and validation environment for defense drone systems,” said Shaun Passley, Ph.D., ZenaTech CEO. “There is no testing environment on earth that replicates the operational intensity, threat complexity, and pace of innovation occurring in Ukraine today. By conducting our drone testing and product validation in this environment, we gain a level of real-world operational credibility that cannot be replicated in a laboratory or controlled airspace. Every data point we expect to collect, every engagement scenario we plan to validate, and every product iteration we execute in Ukraine will directly strengthen our product offering for defense customers from Gulf states to NATO allies to the U.S. Department of War.”
The company announced that it has initiated Ukraine operations and the establishment of a drone manufacturing facility that is intended to serve as a primary production hub for the company’s Interceptor P-1 one-way expendable interceptor drone, targeted to sell for under USD5,000 It plans to utilize this Ukraine facility to manufacture its counter-UAS platforms, which are being engineered to defeat hostile drones at a fraction of the cost of conventional missile-based interception. These operations are designed to leverage Ukraine’s deep aerospace engineering talent base and its position at the forefront of real-world drone warfare and counter-drone innovation.
For more information
https://www.zenatech.com/zenatech-initiates-plans-for-a-ukraine-testing-facility-for-drone-testing-and-operational-validation-of-its-interceptor-defense-systems/ (Source: www.unmannedairspace.info)
—————————————————————————————————————-
Founded in 1987, Exensor Technology is a world leading supplier of Networked Unattended Ground Sensor (UGS) Systems providing tailored sensor solutions to customers all over the world. From our Headquarters in Lund Sweden, our centre of expertise in Network Communications at Communications Research Lab in Kalmar Sweden and our Production site outside of Basingstoke UK, we design, develop and produce latest state of the art rugged UGS solutions at the highest quality to meet the most stringent demands of our customers. Our systems are in operation and used in a wide number of Military as well as Homeland Security applications worldwide. The modular nature of the system ensures any external sensor can be integrated, providing the user with a fully meshed “silent” network capable of self-healing. Exensor Technology will continue to lead the field in UGS technology, provide our customers with excellent customer service and a bespoke package able to meet every need.
A CNIM Group Company
——————————————————————————————————————–
|