Sponsored by Bertin Exensor
www.exensor.com
————————————————————————————————————-
Military And Security Developments
Mar 03.
KEY DEVELOPMENTS
- STRIKES: A fibre-optic drone struck Kharkiv (Kharkiv oblast) for the first time this week, which given it is located around 12 miles (20km) from Russian-occupied territory, underscores the extended range of such systems
- TRUCE: On 27 February, a temporary local ceasefire at the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant (Zaporizhzhia oblast) commenced, indicating that localised, short-term ceasefires are possible
- NEGOTIATIONS: The US’ preoccupation with the Middle East region amid the ongoing Israel-US-Iran war (beginning on 28 February) will likely divert the Trump administration’s attention away from the Russo-Ukrainian war in the coming weeks
- FORECAST: The ongoing Israel-US-Iran war will increase the likelihood of shortages of critical US equipment for Ukraine both in the short and long term; this will further undermine Ukraine’s air defence situation
- OFFENSIVES: We maintain our assessment that recent Ukrainian territorial gains are not indicative of a broader shift in the strategic dynamics on the battlefield, but rather a localised (and likely time sensitive) opportunity successfully exploited by Ukrainian forces. On 2 March, Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi claimed that Ukrainian forces had captured more territory than Russia was able to occupy in February.
- OFFENSIVES: While we cannot confirm the amount of territory retaken, Ukrainian forces have exploited disruptions to Russian military communications, including the interruption to Starlink Services and disruption to Telegram communication. The Ukrainian gains have coincided with a slowing of Russian advances across the front line due to winter conditions, a pattern observed last year. Ukrainian forces have nevertheless been able to launch successful counter-attacks in Zaporizhzhia oblast, north of Huliapole (Sibylline Ukraine Update – 17 February 2026), as well as towards Kupiansk (Kharkiv oblast) in February. Despite tactical losses in these areas, Russia has continued to make gains and consolidate its positions elsewhere, particularly in Donetsk oblast, and it remains unclear how long Ukrainian forces will retain the initiative in this section of the front line. We continue to assess that Russian forces broadly retain the initiative in all other sectors of the front line.
- DONETSK: Russian forces are consolidating their control over Pokrovsk (Donetsk oblast), are pushing westwards and are possibly preparing for renewed assaults to the north in the direction of Dobropillia (Donetsk oblast). Russian forces likely completed the capture of Pokrovsk by late January, while open-source intelligence (OSINT) has confirmed that Russian forces have conducted offensive operations in Hryshne, located immediately to the north-west of Pokovsk, in recent weeks. Most of Myrnohrad, located directly to the east of Pokrovsk, has fallen under Russian control, though small areas in the western part of the settlement remain contested; Ukrainian forces continue to claim that fighting is ongoing in this grey zone. Meanwhile, a prominent Ukrainian military observer has reported the resumption of Russian offensive activity in the direction of Dobropillia, located to the north-west of Pokrovsk. Last year, Russia launched an incursion towards Dobropilla, which was later repelled by Ukrainian forces. We assess that once Russia has completed the full capture of Myrnohrad and consolidated its advances in the Pokrovsk area, it will likely prioritise operations towards Dobropillia.
- STRIKES: A fibre-optic drone struck Kharkiv for the first time this week. Given it is located around 12 miles (20km) from Russian-occupied territory, this underscores the extended range of such systems. Unlike radio-frequency drones, fibre-optic-controlled unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are resistant to electronic jamming; counter-measures remain limited and mostly involve kinetic methods. Previously, Russian fibre-optic drones were assessed to have a range of approximately six to 12 miles (10-20km). However, reports from 2025 indicated that Russia has extended the range of these drones, which can now reportedly reach targets up to 31-37 miles (50-60km) away. Given the difficulty of intercepting such drones, their expanded range will significantly enhance the depth of Russian front-line strikes, facilitating the targeting of Ukrainian logistical nodes and placing more urban environments within the ‘grey zone’ dominated by drones.
- TRUCE: On 27 February, a temporary local ceasefire began at the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant (ZNPP; Zaporizhzhia oblast). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which brokered the ceasefire, said the truce was agreed to facilitate the restoration of the offsite back-up power supply to the ZNPP. The IAEA did not specify how long the ceasefire would last, but the Russian-installed communications director at the facility said on 2 March that the truce was holding on its fourth day. However, earlier on 3 March, the Russian-appointed director of the ZNPP accused Ukraine of ‘indirectly’ violating the ceasefire by shelling the nearby city of Enerhodar (Zaporizhzhia oblast). The ZNPP does not currently produce electricity (and is in cold shutdown), but needs external power to cool nuclear fuel to prevent a meltdown. Repairs will therefore not improve Ukraine’s energy security in the near term. While the relatively stable truce underscores that temporary, localised ceasefires are possible, the likelihood of a comprehensive ceasefire across the frontline lasting more than several days will remain low in the coming weeks and months.
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
- NEGOTIATIONS: The US’ preoccupation with the Middle East region amid the ongoing Israel-US-Iran war (beginning on 28 February) will likely divert the Trump administration’s attention away from the Russo-Ukrainian war in the coming weeks. On 2 March, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that another round of trilateral negotiations was tentatively due to take place on 5 and 6 March in Abu Dhabi (UAE). Although Zelensky stated that the meeting has not been cancelled, Kyiv cannot confirm whether the meeting will take place there due to hostilities in the Middle East region. Similarly, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov stated earlier on 3 March that there is no confirmation yet regarding the time and venue of the next round of negotiations. We assess that Istanbul (Turkey) and Geneva (Switzerland), where the last trilateral talks were held, are possible alternative venues if negotiations take place in the coming days.
- NEGOTIATIONS: Even if talks do occur in the near term, the Israel-US-Iran war’s continuation or escalation will lower the likelihood and frequency of talks over the coming weeks. Since late January, trilateral negotiations and other forms of diplomatic engagement have taken place on a relatively regular basis. While such talks have not yet yielded major tangible results, a breakdown of negotiations will limit the (already low) likelihood of a breakthrough towards ending the war in the coming months. Furthermore, prolonged hostilities in the Middle East will realistically render the US less willing (or able) to commit senior officials to negotiations, particularly those focused on defence and security such as US Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll (who has played a prominent role in negotiations thus far). Ultimately, redirected US attention away from Ukraine will likely benefit Russia over the coming weeks, as it seeks to advance further on the battlefield and exhaust Ukrainian resources (see FORECAST below).
- NEGOTIATIONS: On 28 February, Bloomberg reported that Russia is increasingly considering abandoning the peace process unless Ukraine is willing to make significant territorial concessions. According to an unspecified insider close to the Kremlin, Russia is prepared to sign a draft memorandum of a peace deal if Ukraine agrees to withdraw from Ukraine-controlled parts of Donetsk oblast. A summit between Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin would then allegedly follow, after which both countries’ troops would ‘pull back’, though specifics remain unclear. Under this reported proposal, Russia would be ready to withdraw from Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv and Sumy oblasts; it would also not demand more territory in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts (likely freezing the frontlines there). Allegedly, Russia would also accept the US-led monitoring of a ceasefire, but would reject the deployment of foreign troops to Ukraine; the Russian authorities would also soften previous demands to limit the size of Ukraine’s post-war armed forces.
- NEGOTIATIONS: While we cannot confirm the report, if true, it is highly unlikely to represent a significant shift in Russia’s ultimate long-term war objectives, which have largely remained unchanged since the beginning of its full-scale invasion in February 2022. Zelensky has repeatedly stated that any peace deal should be put to a referendum in Ukraine, with polling consistently showing that the majority of Ukrainian society is against withdrawing from the Donbas region (which comprises Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts). Thus, if Ukraine were to sign a draft peace deal with these conditions (which is highly unlikely in the short term), it remains unclear whether the Ukrainian population would subsequently accept them in a referendum. Russia would highly likely consider opposition in a vote as a confirmation that Ukraine does not want ‘peace’, using it to justify its continuation of the war.
- NEGOTIATIONS: We assess that as the US’ attention is now likely diverted, Russia highly likely perceives that this is not the time to soften its demands. There have been numerous reports in recent weeks that the Trump administration is keen to reach a peace deal by spring or early summer of 2026, which we assess remains an unlikely prospect. On 25 February, a report by Axios further detailed the US’ eagerness for a quick end to the war, reporting of a telephone call between Zelensky and Trump. In that call, Trump reportedly stated that he would like the war to conclude ‘in a month’. We have repeatedly assessed that the US is more likely to pressure Ukraine, rather than Russia, to accept a peace deal given its reliance on Western military aid and other forms of support. As such, a prolonged war in the Middle East will increase the likelihood of the US ramping up pressure on Ukraine over the coming weeks, given the US’ likely desire to end this war quickly to facilitate a focus elsewhere. (For further analysis on how the ongoing Middle East conflict will shape the Russo-Ukrainian war, see FORECAST below).
FORECAST
AIR DEFENCES: The ongoing Israel-US-Iran war will increase the likelihood of shortages of critical US equipment for Ukraine both in the short and long term; this will further undermine Ukraine’s air defence situation. On 2 March, Zelensky warned that a prolonged confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US could result in a shortage of vital air defence interceptors, particularly those used by Patriot systems (PAC-3). Although Ukraine possesses a limited number of such systems, they remain critical for the country’s air defence network, especially for countering ballistic missiles, which are Russia’s most lethal aerial threats.
The successive waves of drone and missile attacks Iran has launched in recent days are likely placing a growing strain on the air defence resources of the US and its regional partners. According to an internal analysis cited by Bloomberg News, Qatar’s stock of Patriot interceptors could be exhausted within four days at its current rate of use. While we are unable to confirm these reports, we assess that a conflict that lasts several weeks will likely reduce the stockpiles of air defence interceptors down to critical levels. This will increase global demand for resupply (which was already high before the beginning of the ongoing Middle East conflict), including for other US regional partners affected by Iran’s strikes. In this scenario, the US’ needs not only to resupply its regional allies but also to maintain reserve stocks (for a potential confrontation with China in the coming years) will place additional pressures on production rates, which are too small to offset the expected surge in orders.
Despite the reported increase in Patriot interceptor production, the US is highly likely to prioritise the resupply of its Middle Eastern regional partners over Ukraine. In January, US defence contractor Lockheed Martin announced that it had reached an agreement with the US Department of War to raise the annual production of its PAC-3 missile interceptors to 2,000 units per year. Over the past two years, the firm has reportedly increased output by around 60%; it is expected to reach the new production target by the end of 2030. Given these systems’ current expenditure rates in the Middle East, we assess that the US will prioritise resupply to that region over deliveries to Ukraine and its European partners, particularly if stockpiles fall to critical levels as a result of a protracted conflict with Iran. This, in turn, would constrain EU partners’ ability to supply Ukraine with additional PAC-3 packages indirectly by drawing down their own stocks and transferring them to Ukraine; numerous European countries began doing so over the past year since US arms transfers to Ukraine ceased in early 2025.
Ultimately, our assessment remains that Ukraine is highly likely to face a critical shortage of air defence systems in the coming months. As a result, Ukraine will highly likely become increasingly vulnerable to ballistic missile strikes, the frequency of which has increased markedly in recent months (see Sibylline Ukraine Monthly – 26 February 2026). Meanwhile, Russia is highly likely to maintain its current saturation strike strategy, relying on large numbers of cost-effective drones and cheap cruise missiles to force Ukraine to expend its limited stocks of PAC-3 interceptors and other high-value Western-supplied systems.
Given that Russia’s strategy has long aimed to undermine the cost-effectiveness of air defence systems reliant on expensive interceptors, the longer the war in the Middle East lasts, the more that it will reinforce the likely effectiveness of the Kremlin’s attritional strategy. The ongoing Middle East war likely illustrates the asymmetrical advantages that cheap one-way attack drones and large quantities of ballistic missiles have over high-cost missile air defence systems during a protracted war. This is a dynamic Ukraine has been facing for years, as it has had to supplement its afore-mentioned air defence systems with lower-cost ones. However, the effectiveness of these supplemental systems remains limited; US-provided Patriot air defence systems are the only capability Ukraine retains that can reliably intercept ballistic missiles. Consequently, depending on how long the Israel-US-Iran war lasts and on Iran’s ballistic missile stocks, severe global shortages of interceptors in the coming years will further undermine Ukraine’s already-strained air defence capabilities.
Feb 27.
- Ukraine: IMF loan will moderately alleviate short-term budgetary strain. On 26 February, the IMF signed a USD 8.1bn loan programme for Ukraine, with a first tranche of USD 1.5 bn to be disbursed immediately. The IMF relaxed its earlier terms, which required Kyiv to implement unpopular tax reforms to unlock the funding. Nevertheless, Ukraine is expected to pass such reforms to receive future tranches. Meanwhile, the final approval of the EU’s separate EUR 90 bn (USD 106 bn) loan to Ukraine has been delayed due to Hungary’s blocking. Securing the funding is essential for Ukraine’s long-term economic stability and, more crucially, its ability to finance its war effort. Ultimately, we assess that the loan will likely be approved either after a compromise with Hungary, or via a legal route that the European Commission (EC) is currently exploring to bypass Hungary’s veto. However, the ongoing dispute will possibly delay the release of the EU loan’s first tranche, which was initially estimated for April. In the meantime, we assess that the disbursement of the IMF loan’s first tranche will moderately ease Ukraine’s budgetary pressures and funding gaps.
- Russia-US: Sanctions pressure will unlikely push Russia to end Ukraine war in coming months. On 26 February, citing unspecified people familiar with the matter, Reuters reported that the US is stalling the sale of international assets belonging to Russian oil major Lukoil, in order to pressure Russia in peace negotiations. On the same day, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) extended the deadline for deals to be completed to 1 April; it was previously set for 28 February. This marks the third such extension since the US sanctioned Lukoil alongside Russia’s largest oil producer Rosneft in October 2025. An unspecified US official stated that any deal will require that Lukoil does not benefit from the sale upfront, with all proceeds to be deposited in a frozen account subject to US jurisdiction. While the Reuters report and the deadline extension indicate limited US pressure to push Russia to negotiate in good faith, we assess that this is unlikely to represent a major policy shift in President Donald Trump’s administration. Pressure on Moscow is unlikely to grow substantially over the coming weeks, with sanctions-related coercion unlikely to alter the Kremlin’s calculus on continuing the Russo-Ukrainian war in the medium term at least. (Source: Sibylline)
03 Mar 26. Cuashub.com said today that Ukrainian interceptors have downed over 1,500 Russian drones in February aloneOleksandr Syrskyi, Commander-in-Chief of Ukraine’s Armed Forces, said Ukrainian interceptor drones destroyed more than 1,500 Russian drones in February, demonstrating the effectiveness of Ukraine’s increasing reliance on drone-based air defense.
Speaking on March 3, Syrskyi said that despite significantly worsening weather conditions and ongoing weapons shortages, the effectiveness of Ukraine’s small air defense units did not decline.
According to the general, Ukrainian interceptor drones carried out approximately 6,300 sorties over the past month, destroying more than 1,500 Russian UAVs of various types launched against Ukrainian territory.
Syrskyi emphasized that he is personally monitoring the implementation of projects aimed at strengthening anti-drone protection, particularly efforts to counter Russian Shahed-type strike UAVs. He said the key role in this effort is increasingly shifting to interceptor drones.
In Kyiv and the surrounding region during February, interceptor drones accounted for more than 70 percent of successful engagements against Shahed drones, he noted.
The Commander-in-Chief also said he received reports on the progress of an anti-drone protection project covering important administrative centers across Ukrainian regions, as well as updates on the modernization of army aviation helicopters to improve their ability to counter Shahed drones.
He added that Ukrainian forces are adapting to new Russian tactics involving the use of Shahed-type drones flying at extremely low altitudes. Work is ongoing with manufacturers to improve the effectiveness of various interceptor drone models.
Syrskyi said that following the meeting, he issued instructions to relevant military command bodies, including newly established structures.
Earlier, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine’s interceptor drones had achieved a 68 percent success rate in neutralizing Russian Shahed drones. In an October 2025 interview, Zelenskyy described the interceptors as the most cost-effective method for countering the Iranian-made UAVs used by Russian forces.
He noted that a single interceptor drone costs between $3,000 and $5,000, while the Shahed drones they destroy are valued at up to $150,000. According to Zelenskyy, that economic balance makes the approach favorable for Ukraine, although significant additional funding is required to scale production.
Ukrainian interceptors have downed over 1,500 Russian drones in February alone – cuashub.com (Source: https://cuashub.com/
02 Mar 26. €500,000 was pledged in under 60 seconds in Latvia on February 24th, the 4-year anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, to accelerate the delivery of frontline evacuation systems for Ukrainian units operating under sustained artillery and drone threat. The rapid commitments were made during an emergency mobilisation at the Latvian National Opera in Riga. By the end of the evening, total funds raised reached €1.45 m for battlefield evacuation and survivability systems, marking the largest civilian donation initiative in Latvia since it regained independence in 1991.
While NATO medical doctrine emphasises the “golden hour” principle – rapid evacuation and stabilisation within the first hour after injury – frontline conditions in Ukraine frequently make this unattainable. Persistent artillery fire, ISR drone surveillance, and damaged infrastructure can extend evacuation routes to 20 kilometres or more. In some sectors, extraction times can reach 24 hours or longer.
The raised funds will be used to procure unmanned ground evacuation systems capable of operating under fire, dedicated evacuation transport vehicles, secure battlefield communication systems, mobile power supply solutions, and night-vision equipment for frontline medics.
Several of the unmanned systems and related technologies are manufactured in Latvia by defence-technology firms, including Natrix, Origin Robotics, and Frankenburg Technologies. Organisers said the equipment will be supplied through established channels supporting Ukrainian units engaged in active operations.
Latvia, a NATO member state on the alliance’s eastern flank bordering Russia, has ranked among the highest per capita supporters of Ukraine since 2022. Jānis Sārts, Director of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence in Riga, speaking independently at the event, said survivability and sustainment are increasingly decisive in protracted, high-intensity warfare: “In modern drone-dominated battlefields, evacuation capability directly affects force endurance,” Sārts said. “Survivability is a strategic variable.”
The mobilisation was organised by the foundation Uzņēmēji mieram (“Entrepreneurs for Peace”) – a fundraising initiative to support the people of Ukraine, spearheaded by Latvian entrepreneurs – in cooperation with McCann Riga & White Label. The emergency session preceded a national charity concert attended by political and business leaders, including Latvia’s president.
23 Feb 26. “Aerlijn’s Nightmare V3 high speed C-UAS interceptor now available in Europe.” Ukraine’s Defence Tech Community in a Linkedin story reports that Dutch company Aerlijn has introduced its Nightmare V3 high-speed interceptor to the European market, developed in collaboration with Ukrainian Project ODIN.
“Designed to neutralise Class-1 strike drones, Nightmare V3 reaches speeds of 280–300 km/h and features a thermal LWIR camera, automatic target acquisition up to 800m, a 10 km tactical range, and an operational ceiling above 6 km,” said the report. “The Dutch company has successfully intercepted Shahed, Gerbera, and Lancet drones. The system has been used and recommended by Ukrainian brigades and is now scaling production in Europe.”
For more information: https://www.linkedin.com/company/defence-tech-community/posts/?feedView=all
https://aerlijn.nl/ (Source: www.unmannedairspace.info)
02 Mar 26. Cuashub.com said today that Zelenskyy says Ukraine ready to share expertise countering Shahed drones. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv is prepared to share its operational experience and technologies for countering Iranian-made drones with international partners, but stressed that protecting Ukrainian cities remains his government’s primary focus.
Zelenskyy addressed reports that Ukrainian specialists could assist allied nations facing similar drone threats. While expressing openness to cooperation, he emphasized that Ukraine’s immediate priority is defending its own territory against ongoing attacks.
“My priority is clear. This morning I held a conference call, and again we discussed how to better protect Kharkiv, Sumy, Poltava, Dnipro, Kryvyi Rih, Kyiv. We have many different challenges,” Zelenskyy said in February.
Ukraine has faced sustained drone and missile strikes since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, including repeated attacks involving Iranian-designed loitering munitions used by Russian forces. Ukrainian air defense units have developed tactics and technical adaptations to counter these systems over the course of the conflict.
Zelenskyy’s comments followed remarks by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer indicating that the United Kingdom could engage Ukrainian experts to assist partners in intercepting Iranian-designed drones. However, Zelenskyy said he has not received any formal requests.
“I haven’t received any direct requests, neither from Great Britain, nor from any of the partners, nor from representatives of the Middle East,” he told journalists.
The president noted that military cooperation has evolved since the early stages of the invasion. Initially, Ukrainian personnel traveled to partner countries including Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States for training. Now, he said, Ukraine has accumulated substantial battlefield experience and operational data on drone warfare, allowing for a more reciprocal exchange.
“We have very experienced people; we are ready to share information. Let our partners come to us, we can continue this,” Zelenskyy said, adding that Ukraine is open to sharing both expertise and relevant technologies with supporting nations.
His remarks carry additional weight amid heightened regional tensions following reports that an Iranian one-way attack drone struck the United Kingdom’s RAF Akrotiri base in Cyprus. According to British media reports, the incident caused minor damage and no casualties but prompted precautionary measures, including the relocation of military families. Unconfirmed accounts suggested the drone may have been a Shahed-136 type, similar to those used in Ukraine.
Zelenskyy reiterated that while Ukraine is willing to assist partners, its first obligation is to safeguard its own population and infrastructure against continued aerial threats.
04 Mar 26. NUBURU, Inc. (NYSE American: BURU), a dual-use Defense & Security platform company focused on non-kinetic effects, directed-energy technologies, electronic warfare and software-orchestrated defense systems, today announced that its wholly owned subsidiary, Nuburu Defense LLC, together with Tekne S.p.A. (“Tekne”), has executed a strategic cooperation agreement with Engineering Bureau “BERYL” LLC, an established Ukrainian industrial company currently producing and supplying vehicles to Ukrainian military forces, to support structured deployment of the TEKNE GRAELION platform within Ukraine.
Tekne has already delivered multiple GRAELION vehicles in Ukraine to the State Emergency Service of Ukraine for demining operations. These vehicles are operational in-country. No additional deliveries are contemplated under that civil-emergency framework.
The present initiative advances deployment of the existing military configuration of the GRAELION platform — previously commercialized in Italy — and now enters the formal Ukrainian military qualification pathway.
As part of the execution structure, Nuburu Defense and Tekne will establish a joint representative office in Kyiv, serving as the program’s operational, industrial and compliance coordination hub.
Industrial Framework Anchored by Proven Assets
The deployment platform is anchored by:
- Operational GRAELION units already active in Ukraine.
- An established military configuration with prior commercialization track record.
- Beryl’s in-country industrial footprint and experience supplying Ukrainian armed forces.
The program roadmap centers on qualification, structured deployment and coordinated industrial scaling — not platform development.
Defined Three-Phase Revenue Scaling Model
The agreement establishes a phased industrial expansion pathway:
- Phase 1 (0–12 months): €5–10m annual revenue target.
- Phase 2: €30–50m annual revenue target.
- Phase 3 (Steady-State): €80–120m annual revenue target.
These benchmarks represent structured annual program volume targets under the agreement’s KPI framework, establishing a defined industrial scaling trajectory aligned with Ukrainian qualification milestones and phased deployment protocols.
The cooperation agreement governs governance, exclusivity and compliance matters. Technical specifications, pricing, volumes and commercial terms remain subject to definitive agreements.
Structured Economic Participation for NUBURU
NUBURU participates structurally through:
- Joint pricing and margin approval authority.
- Program governance and coordinated capital participation.
- Potential integration of higher-margin non-kinetic and software subsystems.
- A 2.9% minority equity position in Tekne, with potential — subject to Italian Government authorization under Golden Power regulation — to increase ownership up to 70% in connection with a potential controlling-interest transaction, including conversion of shareholder loan capital.
This framework positions NUBURU for scalable economic participation aligned with program expansion, subject to regulatory approvals and execution milestones.
Governance, Compliance and Industrial Discipline
Tekne retains sole design authority and IP ownership of the GRAELION platform. All binding commercial proposals require joint technical and financial approval.
The framework includes:
- ITAR, EAR and EU export-control compliance protocols.
- Sanctions-monitoring safeguards.
- Conditional two-year exclusivity for Ukrainian Ministry of Defense participation.
The Kyiv office will oversee qualification progress, pricing discipline, regulatory compliance and industrial coordination.
Management Commentary
Alessandro Zamboni, Executive Chairman and Co-CEO of NUBURU, stated: “The presence of operational GRAELION units in Ukraine and the availability of a commercialized military configuration provide a defined execution baseline. The structured revenue roadmap toward €80–120 m steady-state reflects disciplined industrial scaling anchored in proven assets.”
Dario Barisoni, Co-CEO of NUBURU and CEO of Nuburu Defense LLC, added: “This initiative centers on qualification, structured deployment and industrial oversight. The Kyiv office establishes coordinated regulatory and operational alignment as the program advances through Ukrainian military approval procedures.”
Ambrogio D’Arrezzo, CEO of Tekne S.p.A., commented: “GRAELION is already operational in Ukraine for demining activities and has a commercialized military configuration in Italy. The program now advances through formal military qualification within a structured industrial framework.
(Source: BUSINESS WIRE)
03 Mar 26. British–Ukrainian Company Trypillian Launches VORON-10 and BOMBER-15 Combat Drones. The British–Ukrainian company Trypillian has launched its new combat drones, VORON-10 and BOMBER-15.
According to the manufacturer, the drones were designed to meet the realities of modern warfare, where heavy use of electronic warfare systems (EW), operations in high-risk “kill zones,” and the need for fast, on-site maintenance at frontline positions have become standard practice.
At Trypillian, the main advantage of these systems is described as the combination of combat-proven operational methods with high Western quality standards.
The VORON-10 drone by Trypillian
The VORON-10 tactical strike quadcopter is designed for operations in high-risk areas.
It is intended to meet unit-level needs for destroying armored vehicles, enemy personnel, and electronic warfare (EW) systems at the tactical depth of the battlefield.
The VORON-10 has an effective range of 20–25 km, a payload of 1.5–3 kg, and a modular design that allows for rapid repairs or component replacement in the field. The drone is equipped with a communication system resistant to active jamming by electronic warfare (EW) systems.
BOMBER-15 Strike UAV
The BOMBER-15 drone by Trypillian
The BOMBER-15 unmanned aerial vehicle is designed for precision strikes against targets in the enemy’s near rear.
It maintains controllability throughout its entire flight range. Its deployment makes it possible to hit logistics hubs, field ammunition depots, and firing positions beyond direct line of sight.
The strike range against enemy targets using the BOMBER-15 reaches up to 65 km (depending on the power configuration), with a payload capacity of up to 6 kg.
The drone’s architecture allows for rapid replacement of the warhead and integration of additional equipment – such as signal relays or night vision systems – tailored to specific mission requirements. (Source: UAS VISION/MILITARNYI)
————————————————————————————————————-
Founded in 1987, Exensor Technology is a world leading supplier of Networked Unattended Ground Sensor (UGS) Systems providing tailored sensor solutions to customers all over the world. From our Headquarters in Lund Sweden, our centre of expertise in Network Communications at Communications Research Lab in Kalmar Sweden and our Production site outside of Basingstoke UK, we design, develop and produce latest state of the art rugged UGS solutions at the highest quality to meet the most stringent demands of our customers. Our systems are in operation and used in a wide number of Military as well as Homeland Security applications worldwide. The modular nature of the system ensures any external sensor can be integrated, providing the user with a fully meshed “silent” network capable of self-healing. Exensor Technology will continue to lead the field in UGS technology, provide our customers with excellent customer service and a bespoke package able to meet every need.
A CNIM Group Company
—————————————————————————————————————