Sponsored by Bertin Exensor
www.exensor.com
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Military And Security Developments
Oct 31.
- Ukraine: Expanding military recruitment will face resistance, isolated clashes with security forces. On 30 October, clashes broke out between personnel from the Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centre (TCR) and civilians near an open-air market outside Odesa (Odesa oblast). The confrontation began when TCR personnel conducted mobilisation activities in the area, which met with strong resistance from civilians and quickly escalated into violence. The crowd reportedly used physical force, tear gas and batons, attacking TCR servicemen and inflicting injuries, as well as damaging a service vehicle. The authorities have launched an investigation and are working to identify all participants. The incident underscores growing public resistance to Ukraine’s mobilisation efforts; the country continues to face a chronic shortage of military personnel. The war will likely continue at its current intensity for at least another year. As such, we assess that expanding efforts to mobilise military-aged men will likely be met with growing public opposition and a heightened risk of isolated violent confrontations involving recruitment officials.
Oct 30.
- Emergency power outages highly likely to increase in frequency in coming months. Earlier on 30 October, Ukraine’s state-owned energy grid operator Ukrenergo announced emergency power outages across multiple regions following Russia’s latest large-scale airstrike and urged citizens to use electricity sparingly. Russia launched a particularly large attack involving 52 missiles and 653 drones, which struck multiple power plants across several regions. DTEK, Ukraine’s largest private energy company, stated that this was the third major strike on its thermal power plants this month. The latest attack forms part of Russia’s systematic strike campaign against Ukraine’s energy grid. Unlike in previous years, Russia is adopting a more co-ordinated strategy this winter, aimed at disabling the country’s energy infrastructure by systematically targeting transmission, distribution and generation facilities. We assess that the intensity and increasing lethality of Russian strikes are likely to place significant pressure on Ukraine’s energy grid, with nationwide power outages likely to become increasingly frequent in the coming months. (For further analysis of Russia’s current strike campaign against Ukraine’s energy sector, see Sibylline Ukraine Monthly – 24 October 2025).
- Cyber operations highlight sustained security, espionage risks from Russian threat actors. On 29 October, the software company Symantec reported that a Russian state-sponsored group (‘Seashell Blizzard’) had used Living-off-the-Land (LotL) techniques to conduct cyber attacks on at least two Ukrainian organisations between June and August. The first infection reportedly started on 27 June when threat actors likely exploited software vulnerabilities to infiltrate targeted systems. Seashell Blizzard then deployed two web shells to establish communication with command-and-control (C2) infrastructure, conduct reconnaissance and move laterally through the network. In the following days, the group enumerated all system files and used scheduled tasks and ‘PowerShell’ to maintain prolonged persistence and to facilitate data exfiltration. It also disabled security mechanisms and avoided installing custom malware to enhance the operation’s stealth. As a result, we assess that Ukrainian organisations will face sustained security and cyber espionage risks, as Russia’s cyber strategy continuously adapts to the ever-changing demands of the war in Ukraine.
Oct 28.
KEY DEVELOPMENTS
- POKROVSK: The battle for Pokrovsk (Donetsk oblast) has entered a highly dynamic and intense phase, as Russian forces intensify their efforts to infiltrate the city and encircle Ukrainian defenders
- MISSILES: Russian President Vladimir Putin reported that Russia had successfully tested the nuclear-powered (and nuclear capable) Burevestnik cruise missile, likely as part of a wider strategic deterrence campaign
- STRIKES: Russian strikes continue to heavily target energy infrastructure, causing frequent blackouts and forcing Ukrainian regions to implement scheduled power outages for industrial consumers for the first time this winter
- FORECAST: The US decision to impose sanctions on two of Russia’s largest oil producers highly likely reflects growing frustration with Moscow’s lack of willingness to end the war, rather than a major policy shift from the Trump administration assess specific incidents on a given frontline as and when they occur.
- POKROVSK: The battle for Pokrovsk (Donetsk oblast) has entered a highly dynamic and intense phase, as the Russian forces intensify their efforts to infiltrate the city and encircle Ukrainian defenders. On 26 October, Ukraine’s General Staff acknowledged that approximately 200 Russian military personnel had entered Pokrovsk, engaging Ukrainian troops in small-arms and drone clashes. Reportedly, the Russian forces are specifically focusing on disrupting Ukrainian drone operations. According to the General Staff, the Ukrainian forces are working to prevent Russian troops from advancing further and consolidating their positions. Geolocated footage from 27 October indicates that Russian forces recently advanced along Nakhimova Street in western Pokrovsk.
- POKROVSK: The latest Russian advances have been carried out by elements of Russia’s 2nd Combined Arms Army (CAA), operating south and west of Pokrovsk. As previously reported, the 51st CAA, positioned north of Pokrovsk, remains engaged in heavy fighting around Dobropillia (Donetsk oblast) to the north-east of Pokrovsk, preventing it from pursuing encirclement operations in the area (see Sibylline Ukraine Update – 21 October 2025). However, if the 2nd CAA continues its advance to the north and north-east, the likelihood of a full encirclement of Pokrovsk will increase significantly. Nevertheless, Russian attempts to consolidate control of central Pokrovsk will likely be heavily contested by the Ukrainian forces. Meanwhile, pressure is also increasing to the east, with Russian forces having entered the south-east of Myrnohrad (Donestk oblast) this week, a city located east of Pokrovsk. We assess that the Ukrainian forces defending Myrnohrad are at the greatest risk of encirclement in the coming weeks if Russia makes further advances in Pokrovsk.
- POKROVSK: Russian operations are increasingly pressuring Ukrainian logistics in evacuation operations from Pokrovsk. On 27 October, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky highlighted the increasingly difficult situation in the Pokrovsk area, noting that Russia’s manpower advantage is roughly eight to one. Zelensky stressed that Pokrovsk is not encircled; however, its key logistical hub is surrounded on three sides, leaving a corridor of roughly nine miles (15km) for the Ukrainian forces to bring in troops and supplies. A Ukrainian military medical officer also reported that all bridges into Pokrovsk have been destroyed, severely complicating resupply and the evacuation of the wounded. The frontline is very difficult to pin down given the fluid nature of the contested city centre and its surrounding areas; the Russian and Ukrainian forces are launching deep infiltration operations that are disrupting the consolidation and clearing operations of both sides.
- MISSILES: On 26 October, Russian President Vladimir Putin reported that Russia had successfully tested the nuclear-powered (and nuclear capable) Burevestnik cruise missile. Putin claimed that the missile travelled around 8,700 miles (14,000km) and stayed airborne for over 15 hours during its testing on 21 October. The Burevestnik’s nuclear-powered propulsion theoretically provides the missile with an unlimited range; it is reportedly capable of flying at extremely low altitudes for prolonged periods of time. Putin claims that it can pierce any air defence system in the world due to these features. Nevertheless, the practical capabilities of the Burevestnik are unconfirmed.
- MISSILES: The timing of Putin’s announcement is perhaps deliberately aimed at deterring further US pressure, as it comes shortly after the US’ imposition of new sanctions against Russia’s two largest oil companies, Rosneft and Lukoil. Moscow regularly falls back on nuclear sabre-rattling and weapons tests during periods of heightened tensions, as it seeks to leverage strategic deterrence capabilities to influence decision-makers abroad, in this case likely in Washington DC and Europe. The announcement also follows pre-planned strategic missile drills on 22 October, which saw Russia test capabilities from all arms of its nuclear triad. Nevertheless, these tests happen every year around the same week in October; they are therefore unlikely to have been deliberately timed to influence US decision-making.
- MISSILES: US President Donald Trump stated that Russia should end the war in Ukraine instead of testing new weapons, implying that the US already has nuclear-armed submarines within striking distance of Russia in an apparent response to Russia’s own implicit nuclear threats. We assess that Russian nuclear threats are unlikely to significantly influence the Trump administration in the short term. Nevertheless, the development could realistically reflect a slight pivot in Russian strategic communications towards the US, which have framed the country in more openly adversarial terms this week after refraining to do so since Trump’s inauguration. Putin openly stated on 23 October that the new sanctions were an ‘unfriendly act toward Russia’. The fact that principal Russian negotiator Kirill Dmitriev reportedly relayed information about the Burevestnik test to US officials during his visit to the US last week likely indicates that the test was at least in part directed towards deterring the US. See FORECAST below for further analysis.
- MISSILES: The latest test underscores the Kremlin’s determination to continue allocating significant resources towards the development of new missiles and weapon systems, which will have very little utility for the conventional war in Ukraine. The deployment of the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile in November 2024 also reflects this approach, which highly likely forms part of Russia’s strategic deterrence campaign. Unlike the Oreshnik, the deployment of the Burevestnik against Ukraine is highly unlikely in the short-to-medium term, as the weapon’s primary utility is at the strategic deterrence level. Nevertheless, together with other strategic weapons in development, including the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) and the Poseidon nuclear-armed underwater unmanned vehicle (UUV), these missiles will continue to demand significant resources that could otherwise be spent on conventional capabilities for use in Ukraine.
- STRIKES: Russian strikes continue to heavily target energy infrastructure, causing frequent blackouts and forcing Ukrainian regions to implement scheduled power outages for industrial consumers for the first time this winter. The schedules for power outages are available on the official websites of regional power distribution companies (the full list can be found here). Ukraine’s Ministry of Energy has also reported that the Russian forces are deploying loitering drones over damaged energy facilities, in order to prevent repair efforts. For further analysis of Russia’s current strike campaign against Ukraine’s energy sector, see Sibylline Ukraine Monthly – 24 October 2025.
- STRIKES: Russia’s intense strike campaign is increasing pressure on businesses, even in well-defended areas such as the capital Kyiv. During the overnight strike on 24-25 October, a warehouse complex and the offices of Ukraine’s second-largest pharmaceutical company, Optima-Pharm, were destroyed. This was the second time that the company’s warehouses have been hit in 2025, following a previous attack on 28 August. We assess that the latest strike was likely deliberate, possibly driven by Russia’s perception that the facilities were linked to Ukraine’s military-industrial complex. Further such targeted strikes against major industrial sites are highly likely throughout the winter; foreign-owned sites will also remain at risk.
- STRIKES: Meanwhile, Ukraine has continued its strike campaign targeting Russian oil infrastructure and military facilities. The head of Ukraine’s military intelligence, Kyrylo Budanov, stated that these strikes are primarily intended to disrupt Russia’s oil revenues and to hinder its military production. Simultaneously, Ukraine continues to demonstrate its expanding drone capabilities, as illustrated by a large-scale strike involving 193 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on 27 October. A total of 34 drones reportedly targeted the capital Moscow. Following the attack, various reports indicated GPS jamming in Moscow, likely in an attempt by the Russian authorities to counter further Ukrainian drone strikes against the city.
- STRIKES: On 22 October, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration has lifted restrictions on Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied missiles against Russia, citing unnamed US officials. This followed Ukraine’s reported strike on a chemical plant in Russia’s Bryansk oblast on 21 October using British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles. However, Trump has dismissed these claims as ‘fake news’, sustaining enduring uncertainty over the US’ policy regarding Ukrainian strikes with Western-provided missiles. Regarding UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles, the possible US authorisation pertains to the provision of geospatial intelligence, which facilitates more complex and lethal strikes. While Storm Shadow is capable of striking targets independently using GPS, it is at an increased risk of electronic warfare (EW) and air defence interception when doing so. Ultimately, even if the Trump administration changes its position regarding these authorisations, we assess that the uncertainty over the steady supply of Western missiles will continue to constrain Ukraine’s ability to launch a systematic strike campaign against Russia with such assets.
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
- ASSETS: EU leaders failed to agree to use frozen Russian assets for Ukraine’s benefit at a summit on 23 October in Brussels (Belgium). While the bloc agreed to ask the European Commission to present ‘options for financial support’ for Ukraine, it stopped short of greenlighting the usage of the immobilised funds. Belgium has raised concerns with plans for a reparations loan worth EUR 140 bn (USD 163.2 bn) backed by frozen Russian assets. One of Belgium’s demands is that other member states commit to a ‘full mutualisation’ of the risk, in case Russia makes claims on the assets.
- ASSETS: Belgium holds 86% of all Russian state assets in the EU in the financial clearing house Euroclear, meaning that its approval is crucial for any such move. EU leaders will likely attempt to address remaining concerns at another summit in December. However, we assess that the risk of Russian retaliatory asset seizures and legal action, as well as EU members’ concerns that using such assets will reduce investor confidence, will possibly further delay progress on the loan.
- DIPLOMACY: On 21 October, Bloomberg reported that European countries are working with Ukraine on a 12-point proposal to end the Russo-Ukrainian war along the current frontlines, though it is highly unlikely to facilitate a breakthrough towards peace. As part of the proposal, Ukraine would receive security guarantees, funds for reconstruction and a roadmap to joining the EU. Meanwhile, sanctions on Russia would be lifted gradually, though its frozen central bank assets would only be returned once the Kremlin agrees to contribute to reconstructing post-war Ukraine. Under this proposal, the two warring countries would negotiate on the governance of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories, though neither Europe nor Ukraine would legally recognise any land as Russian. Several details of the plan are non-starters for Russia, as it continues to oppose an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. We assess that Russia will highly likely maintain its demand that Ukraine cede the entirety of the Donbas region as a condition for a ceasefire over the coming months, though the Russian forces do not occupy it fully.
FORECAST
SANCTIONS: The US’ decision to impose sanctions on two of Russia’s largest oil producers highly likely reflects a growing frustration with the Kremlin’s lack of willingness to end the war, rather than a major policy shift from the Trump administration. On 22 October, the US Treasury announced punitive measures against Lukoil and Rosneft, alongside several of their subsidiaries, due to Russia’s ‘lack of serious commitment’ to the peace process. The move came a week after the UK similarly sanctioned the same companies. These are the first sanctions directly imposed against Russia by the US during Trump’s second term; they highly likely reflect the administration’s preference for using economic tools to achieve its foreign policy objectives. Washington DC has remained highly reluctant to impose economic penalties against Moscow up until now, including by excluding it from its global tariffs regime. Nevertheless, the US remains likely to continue to prioritise diplomatic and economic means to influence the Kremlin, rather than to dramatically ramp up military support for Ukraine to maximise pressure on Russia on the battlefield in the short-to-medium term. These latest measures will likely undermine Russia’s ability to generate revenue from its historically lucrative oil trade over the coming months. Some estimates claim that Lukoil and Rosneft account for around two-thirds of the 4.4 m barrels of crude Russian exports per day. In 2022, many European countries stopped importing Russian crude following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine; they have subsequently sought to reduce their energy dependence on Russia (see Sibylline Daily Analytical Update – 23 October 2025), with China and India becoming two of Russia’s largest oil purchasers. However, Reuters has reported that Chinese state oil majors have suspended purchases of seaborne Russian crude after the US imposed measures against Lukoil and Rosneft. Similarly, Reliance Industries (India’s main buyer of Russian crude) reportedly plans to either reduce or cease imports of Russian oil, including by suspending purchases under its long-term deal with Rosneft. If China and India permanently curtail Russian oil purchases, this will likely further strain Russia’s federal revenues in the coming months; however, it is unlikely to lead to an economic collapse. Lukoil’s announcement that it plans to sell its assets abroad due to the sanctions will likely impact Russia’s oil trade over the longer term. An unnamed former Lukoil executive has claimed that the move could lead the company’s revenues and profits to fall by around 30%. However, Russia has shown a clear capability to circumvent sanctions at scale over the last decade. Indirect oil exports via intermediaries, a ‘shadow fleet’ and ‘blending’ oil with third-party producers will potentially provide future loopholes for China and India to continue purchasing Russian oil, though at lower prices than the current ones. Additionally, if global oil prices spike in the future (which is unlikely in the short term), this could realistically encourage Washington DC to repeal the sanctions as a quick way to keep oil prices low, which has remained a key domestic priority for the Trump administration. Repealing the sanctions could also realistically be used as an incentive for future talks, meaning that it remains unclear for how long the measures will be in place. For further analysis on Lukoil’s announcement. Despite the sanctions’ economic impact, they are unlikely to encourage Moscow to cease hostilities in the near term. On 23 October, Putin stated that Russia would not yield to the US’ attempts to exert pressure, while numerous high-ranking officials have sought to downplay the impact of the sanctions. Ultimately, the sanctions will have an impact on federal revenues, but it remains our assessment that Russia will continue to find the money to sustain its attritional war from other sources, though this will come at an increasing economic cost to Russian businesses and tax payers. As long as the Russian forces continue to grind forwards on the battlefield and the Kremlin believes that the war’s attritional logic will cause Ukraine’s collapse before its own, Russia will highly likely continue the war. We continue to assess that the Kremlin is willing for Russia to endure significant economic hardship to achieve its war objectives, which have largely remained unchanged despite being the most heavily sanctioned state in history. Therefore, we assess that economic measures alone are unlikely to result in a significant shift in Russia’s war goals in Ukraine in the short term. Nevertheless, Russian officials have sought to deter the US from issuing further measures against Russia given their clear economic impact. On 26 October, the Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov described the issuance of the punitive measures as an ‘unfriendly move’ which harmed the prospect of reviving bilateral relations. However, Peskov also claimed that the new measures do not mean that Moscow and Washington DC should abandon efforts to restore ties. Similarly, Dmitriev criticised former US president Joe Biden’s use of sanctions to weaken the Russian economy. Such comments and comparisons are highly likely aimed at appealing to Trump to not pursue further sanctions, given that his administration had sought to restore relations with Russia, including by floating sanctions relief and economic co-operation. Looking ahead, the US will possibly issue further punitive measures against Russia if it shows no genuine efforts towards ending the war; however, the Trump administration will likely wait for signals from the Kremlin before taking such action. According to a report from Reuters on 25 October, the US has prepared additional sanctions that it could leverage; these target Russia’s banking sector and infrastructure used to supply Russian oil to global markets.
Oct 27.
- Russia: New rate cuts are unlikely to improve growth forecast in medium-to-long term. On 24 October, Russia’s Central Bank (CBR) cut interest rates by 0.5%, setting them at 16.5%. Following the start of the war in Ukraine, the CBR steadily increased rates in response to a sharp rise in inflation, reaching 21% in late 2024, its highest level since the early 2000s. This peak was followed by a gradual series of rate reductions from June 2025 onwards. Although the CBR has noted that some inflationary drivers – such as demand growth – are easing, it has raised its 2026 inflation forecast from 4% to between 4% and 5%. The latest rate decision also follows the government’s recent proposal to increase VAT in 2026; this is highly likely to sustain inflationary pressure. Meanwhile, last week US President Donald Trump imposed sanctions on major Russian oil companies, which are highly likely to disrupt Russia’s vital oil revenues, adding further fiscal pressure and constraining economic growth. As such, although the latest rate cut will modestly reduce borrowing costs for businesses, it is unlikely to improve Russia’s overall growth outlook in the medium-to-long term.
- Grievances with war, wartime restrictions will drive threat of violence directed at authorities. On 24 October, an unnamed man detonated an explosive device at a railway station in Ovruch (Zhytomyr oblast) at approximately 1050hrs (local time) during a document check, killing himself and three women. Two border guard officials and ten civilians also sustained injuries; one of the deceased was also a border guard. The perpetrator was a 23-year-old resident of Kharkiv oblast who had recently been detained while trying to cross the border illegally in western Ukraine. The Ukrainian authorities have not provided a motive for the incident nor suggested that it could have been Russian sabotage. Given the perpetrator’s profile, the incident is likely to be connected to grievances with Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine and wartime restrictions. In August, an unnamed man in Cherkasy (Cherkasy oblast) threatened military recruitment officials with a grenade after they stopped him to check his military registration documents. We assess that similar violent incidents directed towards the authorities will likely persist for the duration of the war. (Source: Sibylline)
27 Oct 25. How is Ukraine looking to attract foreign defence companies?
Schemes such as the Build in Ukraine programme is intended to attract Western companies to move into Ukraine.
Ukraine wants to attract foreign defence companies to the country. Credit: hyotographics via Shutterstock
- Ukraine is keen to attract Western defence companies to Ukraine to help scale up supply and maintenance capabilities
- Companies like BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, Rheinmetall, and Saab are among the more than 20 already established in-country
- Russia is continuing its bombardment of Ukrainian cities, focussing against on energy infrastructure as winter close in
Amid the destructive reality of the Ukraine-Russia war, opportunity exists for overseas defence companies to locate key manufacturing, maintenance, and supply capabilities into Ukraine, which is keen to attract Western investment. Detailed in a 22 October 2025, release from Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence (MoD), it was restated that 25 international companies were listed as “progressing through various stages of localising their operations in Ukraine”, part of an ongoing ‘Build in Ukraine’ initiative. This reiterates a similar call made in the previous month on Western defence companies moving into Ukraine. Through the initiative, the Ukrainian government is encouraging foreign defence companies to establish production facilities in Ukraine, partly to reduce the logistics line to supplying and maintaining its own forces, but also with an aspiration to make Ukraine a “full-fledged player” in the global defence market. According to the MoD, a number of Western companies are currently operating or expanding in-country production, including BAE Systems (joint production and maintenance of L119 howitzers; Rheinmetall (establishment of repair and production facilities for armoured vehicles; Saab (agreements on joint production of air defence systems; and Northrop Grumman (agreements on joint production of ammunition). Ukraine’s MoD added that the country was attracting companies specialising in uncrewed systems, cybersecurity, and counter-drone capabilities. In September 2025, Sergiy Boyev, Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine, met with German company Flensburger Fahrzeugbau Gesellschaft (FFG), to discuss a joint project on armoured vehicle repairs that includes an in-country repair hub. Specifically, the project relates to the repair of Leopard main battle tanks by FFG in Ukraine, which have been donated in significant numbers by European allies. The same month Ukraine’s Minister of Defence Denys Shmyhal said the Ukrainian government would offer alternative structures to accommodate Western defence companies seeking to establish themselves in Ukraine.
“We offer our partners various models of cooperation, including the ‘Danish model’ and the ‘Build with Ukraine / Build in Ukraine’ initiative. The priority is that the main share of companies’ production be directed to the needs of the Ukrainian military,” Shmyhal stated.
In addition, in order to “minimise risks” for investors and joint ventures, Ukraine will establish Defence City, a legal framework that provides tax incentives, streamlined customs procedures, expanded state financial support, among other benefits.
“We call on foreign companies to invest in Ukraine and set up their production here,” Shmyhal said at the time.
During a trip to Ukraine in September, Army Technology reported the establishment of joint ventures was a prime way for Ukrainian defence companies to work with Western counterparts in building up internal capacity while also accessing the wider European defence market.
Russian bombardment of Ukraine continues
With the coming winter bringing a change in conditions on the ground, Russia has kept up its bombardment of Ukrainian cities, using Shahed drones, and cruise and hypersonic missiles. On 26 October, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said over the previous week more than 1,200 attack drones and missiles had been launched against Ukraine. Through September and October Russia has struck major cities throughout the country, including western regions such as Lviv. Meanwhile in a 24 October intelligence update from the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD), it was revealed that North Korean (DPRK) military personnel had been conducting reconnaissance operations to enable Russian strikes on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region. While DPRK forces were primarily being used for offensive assaults on Ukrainian positions, it was described as “highly likely” that they were also adapting to use tactical drones, which are emerging as a dominant capability on the battlefield. The UK MoD added DPRK forces has sustained around 6,000 casualties in operations against Ukraine, more than half of the 11,000 personnel originally sent by Pyongyang. (Source: army-technology.com)
25 Oct 25. “Ukraine’s Piranha Tech launches new range of C-UAS systems for city protection.” Ukraine’s Defender Media reports Ukrainian defence company Piranha Tech has launched a new range of electronic warfare systems and software solutions to protect large areas from small strike and reconnaissance drones. The idea is to create an ecosystem capable of protecting an entire city, or at least build first and second rings of EW defence around a city,” Anatolii Khrapchynskyi, Deputy Director of Piranha Tech, said during the presentation, quoted in the article. “Piranha Tech is developing networked scenarios where EW interacts with radars, early-warning systems, and command posts. This approach enables wider area coverage, better sector coordination, and faster response to emerging threats, the company says…The key novelty of the presentation was the Sky Defender system, which integrates radars, detection modules, dome-based solutions, and remote jamming units…all components are synchronised via a command post and remotely controlled from the operator’s console.” “According to Ruzhynskyi, the software is fairly straightforward. The main radar defines directions and distributes zones of responsibility between devices. When an enemy UAV enters a zone, the system automatically calculates the effective ranges and response algorithms for each element—detection, jamming, or interception. The software is scalable, assigning operator roles (for instance, an interceptor operator controls only their module, while an EW operator works on their panel), yet all roles are integrated into a unified control system.” (Source: www.unmannedairspace.info)
27 Oct 25. AIRO Group and Bullet to Form Joint Venture Advancing Ukraine-Developed Interceptor Drones. AIRO Group Holdings, Inc. and Bullet (Degree-Trans LLC), a Ukrainian developer of turbojet unmanned interceptor systems, announced that they have signed a Letter of Intent to establish a 50/50 joint venture to produce and deploy Bullet’s combat-proven fixed-wing UAV technology across the United States, NATO defense markets and Ukraine. AIRO will integrate Bullet’s high-speed, modular interceptor drone platform into U.S. manufacturing and defense infrastructure. The advanced interceptor drone achieves remarkable speeds of up to 300 mph (450 km/h), establishing it as one of the fastest unmanned aerial defense systems available. With a substantial flight range of up to 200 km and versatile payload capacity ranging from 2.5 to 9 kg, this interceptor drone represents a significant advancement in aerial defense capabilities. The platform’s modular design allows for rapid deployment and adaptation across various mission profiles, making it an ideal solution for modern defense requirements.
“This partnership unites the innovation and front-line experience of Ukrainian engineers with AIRO’s manufacturing and program-management expertise,” said Dr. Chirinjeev Kathuria, Executive Chairman of AIRO Group. “Together we will bring advanced aerial-defense capabilities to our allies while supporting Ukraine’s defense industry. Recent U.S. government policy updates emphasizing investment in domestic drone manufacturing align perfectly with our joint venture objectives, positioning us to meet critical national security needs while strengthening America’s defense industrial base.”
“Joining forces with AIRO allows Bullet to expand our proven interceptor technology into new markets,” added Viacheslav Lvovych, Director of Bullet. “Our shared objective is to deliver rapid, reliable air-defense solutions that strengthen Ukraine and the wider NATO alliance.”
“For those who serve on the front lines, every second matters,” said Joe Burns, CEO of AIRO Group. “By bringing combat-proven Ukrainian technology into U.S. manufacturing, we’re not only building a faster, more agile interceptor platform – we’re giving our troops and allies the tools they need to respond decisively to aerial threats and protect lives.”
The venture will focus on expanding production capacity for these high-speed interceptor drones in the United States and Ukraine, accelerating research and development of next-generation interceptor and strike configurations, and pursuing qualified contracts with the U.S. Department of War, NATO, and allied ministries of defense. The 300 mph capability of the interceptor drone platform provides unprecedented response times for aerial threats, while its proven combat effectiveness in Ukrainian operations demonstrates real-world reliability. The joint venture will coordinate closely with Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense and pursue qualified contracts with the U.S. Department of War, NATO, and allied ministries. The partners expect to finalize definitive agreements within 60 days. (Source: UAS VISION)
24 Oct 25. UK Expands Missile Production to Supply 5,000 Multipurpose Missiles to Ukraine. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced an expansion of missile production to strengthen Ukraine’s air defenses ahead of the winter season. The United Kingdom will significantly expand its missile production program to deliver 5,000 lightweight-multirole missiles to Ukraine, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on October 24, during the Coalition of the Willing meeting. The initiative aims to bolster Ukraine’s air defense capabilities ahead of the coming winter, when russia is expected to intensify aerial strikes on critical infrastructure. According to Keir Starmer, the decision reflects both a strategic commitment to Ukraine’s defense and a broader effort to strengthen the UK’s domestic defense industry. The missiles in question are expected to serve dual roles in both air defense and battlefield support, capable of intercepting aerial threats such as drones and cruise missiles while also being adaptable for ground-based targets. By supplying these systems, the UK aims to enhance Ukraine’s layered defense network, particularly against the waves of Russian drone and missile attacks that typically intensify during the winter months. The production increase is part of a wider initiative under the Coalition of the Willing, a multilateral framework uniting Western nations in coordinated military and industrial support for Ukraine. The UK has remained a leading member of this coalition, providing the Storm Shadow long-range missiles, Challenger 2 tanks, and extensive training for Ukrainian troops since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion. As Defense Express previously reported, Ukraine should not expect Swedish Gripen fighter jets to appear in its skies in the near future, officials from the Ukrainian Air Force have cautioned. According to Yurii Ihnat, Head of the Communications Department of the Ukrainian Air Force, the production and transfer of such advanced aircraft is a complex and lengthy process that no nation can accelerate overnight. (Source: News Now/https://en.defence-ua.com/)
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Founded in 1987, Exensor Technology is a world leading supplier of Networked Unattended Ground Sensor (UGS) Systems providing tailored sensor solutions to customers all over the world. From our Headquarters in Lund Sweden, our centre of expertise in Network Communications at Communications Research Lab in Kalmar Sweden and our Production site outside of Basingstoke UK, we design, develop and produce latest state of the art rugged UGS solutions at the highest quality to meet the most stringent demands of our customers. Our systems are in operation and used in a wide number of Military as well as Homeland Security applications worldwide. The modular nature of the system ensures any external sensor can be integrated, providing the user with a fully meshed “silent” network capable of self-healing. Exensor Technology will continue to lead the field in UGS technology, provide our customers with excellent customer service and a bespoke package able to meet every need.
A CNIM Group Company
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-