• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • COMTECH banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

NEWS IN BRIEF – EUROPE

June 25, 2017 by

25 Jun 17. MoD blasts Lockheed over Warrior tank delay. The boss of US defence giant Lockheed Martin has been given a dressing down by the MoD over spiralling costs and delays on a £1bn contract to upgrade Britain’s tanks.
Lockheed was hired almost six years ago to overhaul and fit new gun turrets to Britain’s ageing fleet of Warriors, which have served in the Gulf, Bosnia and Iraq.
However, the American company is understood to be struggling with costs and complexity over the overhaul.
Lockheed has not yet completed an initial contract to upgrade 12 demonstration tanks, significantly delaying the award of a follow-on deal to fit out the fleet of more than 600 vehicles.
Tony Douglas, the chief executive of Defence Equipment and Support, the MoD’s weapons-buying arm, confronted Lockheed boss Marillyn Hewson at last week’s Paris air show over the problems.
The talks come amid a cash crunch at the MoD, as ministers quietly kick off a 60-day spending review. The defence budget has come under increasing pressure since last year’s Brexit vote, with the 14% plunge in sterling raising the cost of overseas kit, from Lockheed’s F-35 stealth jets to Boeing’s Apache helicopters. The cash squeeze is likely to see contracts delayed and cut.
Whitehall’s spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, has said that the affordability of the MoD’s equipment plan is “at greater risk than at any time since its inception”. It said higher costs and extra gear would eat up its entire £10.7bn contingency pot.
Sources said the MoD had triggered a study into alternatives to Lockheed’s Warrior deal — raising the prospect of it being scrapped or opened up to rival bidders, or for the number of tanks to be cut. British defence giant BAE Systems lost out to Lockheed in 2011 on the upgrade contract.
Francis Tusa, editor of Defence Analysis, said: “If Lockheed Martin walks away from the Warrior, its reputation in the UK will be significantly dented.”
The army wants to upgrade its 643 Warrior tanks, built by GKN in the late 1980s, to keep them fighting into the 2040s. The overhauled tanks had been due to enter service in 2018, but that date has been pushed back significantly.
The crisis raises concerns over the army’s £3.5bn order for 589 new smaller Ajax tanks. Lockheed is also building their turrets while American rival General Dynamics makes their hulls.
The MoD said “it would not be appropriate to comment . . . on commercial discussions”. Lockheed declined to comment. (Source: The Sunday Times)
BATTLESPACE Comment: Upgrading old armoured vehicles is always a thankless atsk as problems unfold as the vehicles are stripped down and build standards vary from vehicle to vehicle. BAE Systems was reluctant to low bid to win this Programme despite being Design Authority given its Liquidated Damages paid over let delivery of the Terrier vehicle. Two problems have faced Lockheed over warrior, one was the number of vehicles, 36, affected by the addition of steel Bar Armour. If you weld steel to aluminum you get cracks, which is what has occurred with these vehicles. Secondly the original turret, a widened version of the existing Warrior turret, redesigned to accommodate the CT40 canon was too heavy and had to be replaced with a design reminiscent of the BAE Systems MTIP 2 turret which was not selected. Weight has always been an issue with the Warrior Upgrade Programme and is still belied to be a challenge to Lockheed. The CT40 canon, which is GFE, is progressing, although the Airburst Rounds, crucial to Warrior is still not qualified and there are still dust egress problems when firing. Numbers are also decreasing to around 420 which will of course give less opportunity to amortize the cost. Sources at Paris said that Jane’s had been tasked to look at alternatives with CV90 from BAE Systems being mentioned. If no compromise is reached between Lockheed and DE&S, with Tony Douglas keen to prove his ‘hardman’ image (at a time when some see him as being bypass

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • AtkinsRealis logo
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • ECHODYNE logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
  • Leonardo DRS logo
  • MTC logo
  • IDC logo
  • IDC logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    September 21, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    September 21, 2023
    Read more
  • CONTRACT NEWS IN BRIEF

    September 21, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT