• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

HOUSE COMMITTEE TO REIN IN FCS SPENDING

June 24, 2005 by

06 Jun 05. Dawn S. Onley, GCN Staff wrote that the House Armed Services Committee is questioning whether available technology can fulfill the Army’s vision of transformation.

Concerned about the progress and escalating cost of the Future Combat Systems program, lawmakers last month sliced $400 million from the Defense Department’s $3.4 billion program request for fiscal 2006 during the markup of the Defense Authorization bill.

The committee stressed the need to rein in the escalating cost of major procurement programs such as FCS, and members said the Army should restructure the $107 billion program until technology matures.

“The committee has numerous concerns with the Future Combat Systems program. Reasons include technology immaturity, lack of firm requirements, unknown program costs and duplicative programs,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), committee chairman, during markup of the 2006 National Defense Authorization Bill. “Therefore, the committee believes the FCS program should be restructured until mature technology is demonstrated in relevant environments, requirements are determined and program costs are known.”

Between 2004 and 2009, the Army’s projected costs for FCS rose from $19 billion to $30.3 billion, according to the committee. In its markup of the bill, the committee included a requirement that the comptroller general submit to Congress an annual review of the FCS program detailing whether the systems development and demonstration phase of the program is meeting established performance, technology readiness, cost and schedule goals.

The Army declined to comment on the proposed budget cuts and new reporting guidelines.

“We don’t comment on congressional language at this stage of the legislative process,” said Ken Jarvis, director of public affairs for Future Combat Systems.

FCS is designed to link 18 manned and unmanned weapons systems via a common computer network known as the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical.

The Senate Armed Services Committee last month authorized the full $3.4 billion for FCS—setting up a conference committee showdown with the House.

The House will vote on the authorization bill later this month, while the Senate has not set a date to bring the legislation to the floor.

GAO also concerned

The House’s concerns mirror a Government Accountability Office report earlier this year that said the FCS program faces network, developmental and financial challenges that continue to slow progress. FCS’ information network is de- pendent on the success of the Joint Tactical Radio System and WIN-T, two programs facing significant technical challenges and aggressive schedules that threaten the fielding of future force capabilities, according to GAO.

JTRS and WIN-T are separate programs that are not included in FCS costs.

Michael O’Hanlon, senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, applauded Congress for getting involved in the ambitious program and questioning some of the Army’s assertions.

“There is nothing wrong with Congress inserting itself in the process, asking tough questions, casting a skeptical eye on some of the more ambitious claims made for this program, and honoring some parts of the Army’s relevant budget request more than others,” O’Hanlon said. “FCS is an important concept, but in fact it is many concepts merged together, some much more achievable in short order than others, and the Army has itself altered the priorities as- signed to various elements of the overall program in recent years,” he said.

Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey announced recently that the service would restructure the contractual and managerial aspects of the program. As part of the re- structuring, Harvey is establishing an Army Modular Force Integration Office to ensure technologies are moved into troop systems as soon as they are available.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    February 3, 2023
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    February 3, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    February 3, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT