• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

HAWK DEAL TESTS UK GOVERNMENT DEFENCE INDUSTY POLICY

September 2, 2003 by

30 Jul 03. Hundreds of jobs hung in the balance as the UK cabinet stood divided on whether or not to back BAE Systems Plc’s (London:BA.L – News) multi-billion pound military jet order, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday.

The government is weighing up whether to take as many as 31 of the latest Hawk trainer jets for the Royal Air Force or open the contract to foreign competition. BAE has told employees that 470 jobs were at risk at the end of July if the government had not made a decision.

Patricia Hewitt, the country’s trade and industry secretary, has rebuffed a plea from Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon, who called on her to back the BAE bid with DTI money, the newspaper said. Chancellor Gordon Brown has argued that the deal offered by BAE, hammered by huge overruns on two other UK defence projects, offers poor value and could cost taxpayers one billion pounds ($1.63 billion) more than a rival Italian one, the Financial Times reported.

The decision is seen as a test of Prime Minister Tony Blair’s defence industry policy, and whether it means the British jobs and exports will be more important than cost in future deals.

“If we do not get the Hawk, the policy is meaningless,” the newspaper quoted a defence official as saying. Earlier this month, Blair told parliament that while the government wanted to do the “best for the British defence industry”, any deal must represent value for money.

A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Defence said discussions were ongoing and a decision could come as soon as Wednesday.

BAE has said that the cuts would come at its Hawk factory in Brough, Yorkshire, in northern England, unless the government made a positive commitment to the aircraft. BAE could not be immediately contacted for comment.

Comment: BATTLESPACE readers have expressed astonishment at the government’s stand on this Hawk deal. Has the government calculated the true cost of purchasing the untried two engine Aermacchi aircraft? In addition to the £20bn market for trainers which would be lost, the RAF would have a two aircraft fleet which would cost billions to install new ground handling equipment. The Italian aircraft is twin engined and has not been orderd by its own Air Force! If this deal is lost the defence industrial policy will be reduced to a laughable attempt by the government to provide a paper commitment to the defence industry at the same time as wishing to dispose of parts of it to the USA. It is ironic that Patricia Hewitt has decided not to support Geoff Hoon when she made a major commitment to Multidrive in its bid to win the wheeled tanker programme. This comes at a time when BAE is being blamed for cost overruns on the CVF bid when the government is to blame for increasing the tonnage of the vessel from the original requirement which was bound to increase the price!

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    January 26, 2023
    Read more
  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    January 20, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    January 20, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT