• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • SPECTRA banner
  • Curtiss-Wright banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Contact

HAS HOON LETTER STOPPED UK TRUCK AWARD?

August 17, 2004 by

30 Jul 04. Following revelations that UK Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon has written to his U.S. counterpart Donald Rumsfeld to complain about U.S. moves to restrict the Pentagon’s ability to buy from foreign firms, there has been an ominous silence to the award of the UK Support vehicle contract being fought over by US firms Oshkosh and Stewart and Stevenson and Germany’s MAN and Mercedes. A number of sources suggested that Oshkosh was to be awarded the contract following the defence cuts announced during Farnborough, but, there has been a deathly silence. BATTLESPACE sources suggest a split between the DPA recommendations and the politicians desire to see more UK defence involvement in such projects as JSF. Whilst some observers below suggest that the Watchkeeper award was related to this problem it is more likely that the bid was won by Thales utilising Israeli technology which, by their own admission, Northrop Grumman could not match in up-front costs, reflecting Israelis desire to win £1bn of European business a year. Northrop’s continuing interest in the JUEP programme and its AWACS selection demonstrates that the company is keen for a long-term involvement in UK with Watchkeeper being seen as a short term blip.

In the letter, written last month and seen by the newspaper, Hoon said Britain was prepared to retaliate against U.S. protectionism in defence spending. He described the moves to restrict buying from foreign companies as a “potentially serious blow to U.S.-UK relations”. “They would put us under pressure domestically to review our own policies and to consider whether we were prepared to continue to place significant defence contracts with U.S. suppliers in the face of what could only be seen as a demonstrably uneven playing field,” he said.

This is not the first time that a truck requirement has been ‘politicised’. In the early 1980’s Reynolds Boughton was favourite to win the UK DROPS requirement with its Bennes Morrel-based system, in a bid fiercely fought by David Stride who claimed to have invented the system! The subsequent award to Finnish company Multilift which secured offset for the Finnish Hawk deal led to a complaint by Reynolds Boughton which subsequently led to the disastrous purchase of the 554 RB-44 vehicles at some £56m, most of which are still in store, against the SMC/Land Rover Sandringham 139 vehicle latterly sold in large numbers to Australia.

MAN has put in a very strong offset bid with BAE SYSTEMS to support the sale of 16 Typhoon aircraft to Austria and it may be that history is repeating itself and the desire by the UK Government and BAE to offload numbers of Typhoons to customers such as Austria, Greece and Singapore may win the day over the DPA selection which is believed to favour a US solution?

The FT said the strength of Hoon’s language reflected growing discontent among British government officials over a lack of U.S. defence-related concessions for Britain, despite Britain’s support for the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq.

The paper quoted a U.S. official as saying there was concern that the recent decision by the Ministry of Defence to choose Thales (Paris:TCFP.PA – News) over Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC – News) for the Watchkeeper contract was motivated partly by anger at the U.S. attitude. However the paper said the Bush administration was likely to kill provisions of the 2005 defence authorisation bill which would restrict the foreign participation.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • Pythia
  • Teledyne
  • Exensor
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • ECHODYNE logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
  • Leonardo DRS logo
  • MTC logo
  • IDC logo
  • DSEI logo
  • DVD2024 logo
  • SDSC logo
  • TELEDYNE FLIR logo
  • VeteranUK logo
  • Matrix Space logo
  • ST Engineering logo
  • EWS logo
  • sentinel photonics logo
  • capua logo
  • Curtiss-Wright logo
  • Brave1 logo
  • Drone Evolution logo
  • AEI Systems logo
  • EOS logo
  • NMSUK logo
  • Openworks logo
  • Sandown Park logo
Hilux UKDSE AARTOS ST Engineering Future Artillery

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
41 St Georges Drive
London SW1V 4DG

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • Protek Selected By Dutch Armed Forces

    May 2, 2026
    Read more
  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    May 1, 2026
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    May 1, 2026
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2026.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT