• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

BAE SYSTEMS THREATENS TO PULL OUT OF CVF PROJECT

February 4, 2005 by

BAE SYSTEMS THREATENS TO PULL OUT OF CVF PROJECT

01 Feb 05. The FT reported that, BAE Systems, once the Ministry of Defence’s preferred choice to build two aircraft carriers, has threatened to pull out of the project if Halliburton, the US contractor, is chosen to manage the £2.9bn programme. This month KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, won a competition to lead an alliance to build the ships, but the ministry has balked at formally announcing the selection because of BAE’s objections, according to industry officials involved in the programme.

BAE declined to comment on its talks with the MoD, other than to say it was hopeful of resolving any problems. But its objections are believed to centre on the scope of KBR’s role in the alliance, which BAE has argued is too broad.
According to one industry official briefed on KBR’s proposal, the US-based engineering and construction group wants to place its own personnel at BAE’s shipyards. In addition, there are issues over whether KBR would have a say in the design of the carriers, a realm BAE believes should be left to itself and Thales, the Paris- based defence electronics group teamed with BAE to build the ships. KBR declined to comment on its proposal. Despite BAE’s objections, industry officials said it was unlikely the MoD would change its mind on selecting KBR. Several believed, however, that KBR’s role would be pruned in order to meet some of BAE’s objections. KBR’s selection has been controversial from the start. Its prime competitor for the contract, UK-based Amec, had done the original consulting work for the MoD that led it to choose an alliance arrangement instead of selecting a traditional prime contractor to run the programme. As a result, Amec was widely viewed as the most likely winner, and was backed by BAE.

In addition, KBR is the owner of a shipyard in Nigg, near Aberdeen, which is seen as a possible alternative final assembly site for the carriers instead of the Rosyth dockyards in Fife. Rosyth is in the constituency of Gordon Brown, the chancellor, and the KBR selection has caused concern in the Treasury.

One former MoD official said its procurement agency continued to have strained relations with BAE, particularly in shipbuilding, because of past struggles on programmes such as the Astute submarine.

An industry executive said Sir Peter Spencer, the head of the procurement agency, was also concerned about the “cosy relationship” between the UK’s main shipbuilders, and saw KBR’s widened role as a way to rectify this. Amec, in contrast, was seen as a BAE ally in the competition and proposed a more traditional project management role for itself.

The programme has had a slow start, with its assessment phase being extended by more than a year.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    January 27, 2023
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    January 27, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    January 27, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT