• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

ARMORED VEHICLE LESSONS FROM OIF

February 4, 2005 by

ARMORED VEHICLE LESSONS FROM OIF
– by Scott R. Gourley

One ubiquitous presence among the lessons learned from the coalition
experiences in Iraq has involved the value of armor. The most obvious of these lessons – and one that seems to be most easily grasped by the public – involves the “uparmoring” of light skinned vehicles. These programs
continue to garner increasing emphasis in light of continuing insurgent /
terrorist threats.

However, armor was also a common factor in another set of lessons learned. Specifically, many seemed surprised by the flexibility of contributions made by conventional armored platforms. From the U.S. perspective, the open desert value of the M1 series Abrams tank and M2 / M3 series Bradley Fighting Vehicle were well known, having previously been proven more than a decade earlier in Operation Desert Storm (ODS).

Moreover, experiences in that earlier conflict prompted their own series of enhancements. Following the conflict, the Army had assembled a blue-ribbon panel of generals, master gunners and Soldiers to look at operational issues of training and doctrine and materiel issues. Among the results of that panel was a series of upgrades to the M2A2 Bradley, known as the “ODS package.”

The first 2,200 ODS models were upgraded within the next few years, with a second phase of upgrades addressing items that lacked sufficient technical maturity for incorporation in the earlier program. As a result of these upgrades, the majority of the Bradleys in the Army inventory are now the A2 ODS models, modified as a direct result of lessons learned from desert combat during Operation Desert Storm (The newer A3 Bradleys have been fielded to the Fourth Infantry Division and are now being fielded to the First Cavalry Division).

Because of this lessons-based materiel planning it came as little surprise that the latest models of these systems performed so well as U.S. units like the Third Infantry Division (Mechanized) [3ID (M)] successfully attacked over 600 kilometers (km) from Kuwait to Baghdad, through storms of biblical proportion and constant enemy resistance.

In terms of raw lethality, one 3 ID after action report noted that “Tanks were effective against most enemy direct fire targets, however, they were overkill in many cases. The armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS)/high explosive antitank (HEAT) mix was adjusted in the ammo basic load (ABL) at the outset and was continually refined as the target array of trucks, BMPs, bunkers, and buildings became better known. Toward the end of offensive operations, ABLs consisted of about 60% HEAT and 40% APFSDS. The 25mm on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) was highly effective against armored personnel carriers (APCs), enemy tanks, and the vehicles employed by the paramilitary forces in open and urban terrain.”

The U.S. report also highlights survivability issues, explaining that “The M1 and M2 proved to be not only lethal, but exceptionally survivable as well. Throughout the conflict, M1s and M2s took thousands of hits from small arms and rocket propelled grenades (RPGs). Rarely were the vehicles affected, and even the few times they caught fire, nearly every soldier walked away unhurt. Even as the division moved hundreds of kilometers, 3ID (M) was able to maintain above a 90% combat capability for M1s and M2s. The M1 and M2 protected soldiers and proved to be the most survivable and durable equipment on the battlefield.”

High lethality and survivability were largely expected. But it is
notations about performance in urban terrain, like those cited above, that set the stage for what seems to have been the greatest surprise for military observers. While many military analysts were busy crafting a notional “Battle of Baghdad” that would feature months of house to house fighting by light infantry units, the fact was that the city itself fell to a series of rapid armored strikes that were administered during the period

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    January 27, 2023
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    January 27, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    January 27, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT