• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • SPECTRA banner
  • Curtiss-Wright banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Contact

Future Soldier – Hardly Transformational But A Reasonable Start By Howard Wheeldon, FRAeS, Wheeldon Strategic Advisory Ltd.

November 29, 2021 by Julian Nettlefold

29 Nov 21.  Claimed by the MOD PR machine to be the largest transformation of the Army for over twenty years, the MOD blurb has it that Future Soldier’ will see the Army become more integrated, agile, expeditionary and lethal. Not before time I hear you say but is the reality far more similar in context to what someone yesterday described as being – smoke and mirror against a background of making the Army even smaller?

Amongst many proposals contained within ‘Future Soldier’ is creation of a ‘Ranger Regiment’ and also, reversing another of the crass decisions made in SDSR 2010, new plans for the Army to return to Germany.

As a concept clearly aligned to that of ‘Special Forces’ I have absolutely no issue with what has been announced in regard of the Rangers. Even so and having read the many different arguments over the weekend, I know that there are many that have seen decision as merely being some kind of re-invention of the Parachute Infantry. Such arguments can easily be supported through confirmation that the new Rangers units are a rebadging exercise of other units.

The plan has certain merit but what it doesn’t do is face up to the reality of forcing the Army to stop clinging to history as the route to success. By that I mean the Secretary of State has steered clear of making changes to the system of infantry, cavalry, regiments and so on. One of the big troubles of having so many regiments is that repetition in respect if training.

Rarely straying into Army affairs as has long been my fashion and admiring many views expressed by Nicholas Drummond over the years, I am mindful of an excellent article he wrote 18 months ago in which he suggested that “the British Army’s Regimental System is often acknowledged as one of its greatest strengths, the source of an extraordinary esprit de corps that persuades soldiers to give their utmost in the most extreme of circumstances. But” he said “it has also been criticised as one of its greatest weaknesses, an outdated institution that’s irrelevant in a modern age, an extravagant waste of money and a barrier to innovation”.

The Army today consists of 46 regular regiments plus a number of Reserve and Overseas Territories regiments or defence forces. Regimental members see them as families and as reflecting the best way that Army units could be structures and organised, build and strengthen identities, recruitment and retention and forge very necessary bonds. But, having large numbers of regiments can and does also increase the possibility of rivalries forming,

The cost of maintaining so many different and distinct regiments must be enormous but while most often succeeding, it is brave Secretary of State that dares to venture into the possibility of cutting the number of regiments. That said, numbers of regiments have been effectively halved over the past thirty years – so too has the number of Army personnel numbers.

These are the words written of Baroness Goldie, Minister of State House of Lords to put out in relation to Future Soldier:

“The Army of the future must adapt even more radically if it is to adapt to the threats of the future. Let us be clear: those threats are proliferating ones, from increasing humanitarian crises to evermore capable and determined violent extremists and proxy forces, and the ever-present spectre of great power competition. To keep pace with the changing character of warfare, our Army must be forward-looking, adaptable and embracing of new ways of working, as much as new weapons and technologies. Not only must it have the best force structure to counter an ever-growing range of threats to the UK, our people and interests, but it must achieve our ambitions on schedule and in budget.”

And these are the words written for Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace to put his name to:

“Far from being deprived of investment as some claim, we are injecting £41.3 billion into Army equipment and support this decade. That is £8.6 billion more than had been planned prior to the integrated review. We are using those funds to create a modern, innovative and digitised Army. Our future Army will be leaner but more productive, prioritising speed and readiness over mass mobilisation, but still over 100,000 strong, integrating regulars and reserves, as well as all the civil servants and partners from the private sector.”

Of course, an Army is worth nothing without equipment and the ability for it to be moved to where it needs to be. Creating a hybrid unit such as the Rangers further questions the crass decision by Secretary of State Wallace and his outgoing Chief of Defence staff to scrap the RAF C-130J fleet.

Amongst the billions of pounds of equipment and support being spent on the Army as included in Secretary of State Wallace’s statement above presumably includes the £6bn Ajax tracked armoured fighting vehicle – one that may well be scrapped if its problems and failings cannot be resolved. Pity is that Secretary of State for Defence lost an opportunity to admit that they were wrong to stop the Warrior IFV upgrade and reverse another very bad decision announced in the Integrated Review process.

Still, at least the Army will soon have 523 Boxer 8 x 8 multi-role armoured vehicles – proven capability that although wheeled rather than tracked provides excellent flexibility and mobility and that unlike Ajax, is far from being regarded as a botched procurement exercise with GD of parts being manufactured in Spain and glued together in South Wales.

So is Future Soldier smoke and mirrors, a quick decision made by Secretary of State to counters the enormous level of negativity surrounding the modern day Army, what it is there for and what it needs to be, or is it really a way forward to re-establishing the Army where it needs to be in respect of all aspects of UK defence?

The truth is probably that although this plan is hardly that radical or transformational. it is a positive start to a process of change and recognition that the future for British Army operation needs to be very different to the past.

CHW (London – 29th November 2021)

Howard Wheeldon FRAeS

Wheeldon Strategic Advisory Ltd,

M: +44 7710 779785

Skype: chwheeldon

@AirSeaRescue

 

 

Filed Under: News Update

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • Pythia
  • Teledyne
  • Exensor
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • ECHODYNE logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
  • Leonardo DRS logo
  • MTC logo
  • IDC logo
  • DSEI logo
  • DVD2024 logo
  • SDSC logo
  • TELEDYNE FLIR logo
  • VeteranUK logo
  • Matrix Space logo
  • ST Engineering logo
  • EWS logo
  • sentinel photonics logo
  • capua logo
  • Curtiss-Wright logo
  • Brave1 logo
  • Drone Evolution logo
  • AEI Systems logo
  • EOS logo
  • NMSUK logo
  • Openworks logo
  • Sandown Park logo
Hilux UKDSE AARTOS ST Engineering Future Artillery

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
41 St Georges Drive
London SW1V 4DG

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • Protek Selected By Dutch Armed Forces

    May 2, 2026
    Read more
  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    May 1, 2026
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    May 1, 2026
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2026.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT