• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2022

WITHERING DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL BASE

September 15, 2010 by

UK DEFENCE (9)- WITHERING DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL BASE
By Howard Wheeldon is the Senior Strategist at BGC Partners

13 Sep 10. Whilst confirmation last week that over 700 BAE Systems jobs spread across Warton, Samlesbury, Brough and Chadderton plants would be lost may be put down to equipment cuts announced by the previous Labour administration it should also be seen as a timely reminder of many more jobs that will be lost as a direct result of SDSR. The review process is expected to inflict severe cuts right across the UK military but equally true is that the SDSR process will severely impact on the UK skills base as the number of industrial and planning jobs within the defence industrial base is cut. BAE Systems cuts may predominantly be put down to the sharp reduction in through life support requirement on programmes such as Nimrod, VC-10, Harrier and Tornado. The SDSR process itself is expected to lead to yet another big round of equipment cuts right across all three armed force groups. And if that is so then it can be expected to have further major implications for the UK defence industrial as orders for new equipment are either cancelled or wound down in numbers. In value terms the defence industrial base will also suffer a big numbers game as the requirement for ships, aircraft and tanks is reduced and projects that may be in the planning or early build stage get cancelled. One such programme that has from the start of the SDSR process led the list of possible cuts is the £5bn programme to build two Queen Elizabeth class carriers for the Royal Navy.

Just as the two previous Royal Navy carrier programmes had done in the 1950’s and the mid 1970’s the new carrier programme has been the subject of an awkward debate over whether we actually need a carrier force. It is an argument that has been fiercely fought out between the protagonists of both views. Having been down the awkward road of carrier debate once before in my own career my own view is that the Royal Navy does have a case for at least one carrier replacement.

Over the past weekend the UK press and media has again raised the spectacle that despite contracts with a value of £1.2bn having already been awarded to contractors working on both carriers and the likelihood that a total £2bn may have already been spent on the project overall that the government may yet scrap both the carriers in build. Clearly such a decision would have a very big impact on BAE Systems, its partners companies in the venture such as Babcock International and on whose Rosyth base the vessels are currently being built plus the various contractors and suppliers involved. Potentially thousands of jobs in Scotland, the North West and South of England could well be lost let alone jobs of many hundreds of sub contractors. Moreover, if the carriers were to be cancelled the loss of skilled workforce would in my view mean that never again could we consider building ships of this nature in the UK.

My own view is that the Royal Navy will get the first carrier [Queen Elizabeth] but that the second carriers will be downgraded to a lesser role, stalled – meaning put back another two years to maybe 2020 completion, cancelled altogether or maybe built and sold to a third party customer such as India. Of course, the whole programme could be delayed meaning pushed back by another two years. But the though of a partially built Queen Elizabeth being left just as the former liner Queen Mary was left untouched for two years back in the early 1930’s does not strike me as a very sensible proposition. It is to me inconceivable that having gone this far that the government would now cancel both carriers – albeit that it may yet cancel one.

Cancellation of existing programmes or those that are already well down the planning stage is the cause of much angst and concern amongst all those of us that observe how Britain is going about a huge change in approach to defence. Our main concern and as I have hope

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • InVeris
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • DSEi
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
Hilux DVD2022 GlobalMilSat

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    July 1, 2022
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    July 1, 2022
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    July 1, 2022
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2022.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT