• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2022

US ARMY TACTICAL TRUCK UPDATE

May 19, 2011 by

US ARMY TACTICAL TRUCK UPDATE
By Scott R. Gourley

18 May 11. The US Army’s recently-released Tactical Wheeled Vehicle (TWV) Strategy is designed to chart “the way ahead” to manage the modernization and sustainment of the Army’s TWV fleets. Army planners point to the current fleet inventory as representing “an investment of over $70 Billion” that is “worthy of our best efforts at intensive management and planning.”

The new Strategy covers the timeframe of current through FY 2025 and supercedes the previously-released Army 2009 TWV Investment Strategy, which had focused largely on the financial implications of fleet management. In contrast, the new strategy has been developed “to inform the requirements process, TWV Acquisition Strategy, Fleet Management Plan (to be published), and the development of the Army Program Objective Memorandum (POM). “

Strategy developers are quick to highlight the evolution in “the Army truck” over the past few decades, from its origins as a simple transport vehicle to its current array of increasingly complex tactical roles and missions.

“The Light Tactical Vehicle (LTV) fleet provides a good example of this evolution,” it states. “[T]he High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) was initially fielded to serve as a light, highly mobile and unarmored vehicle at a procurement cost of roughly $70 thousand when adjusted for inflation. In its efforts to adapt the HMMWV to modern requirements, the Army has increased the performance and protection of the HMMWV, increasing the cost of an up-armored variant to over $160 thousand (over $220 thousand with Fragmentation Kits). This modern Up-Armored HMMWV (UAH), however, still does not fully meet the evolving mobility or protection requirements of our Soldiers. The Army is therefore developing the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) to fill this capability gap. The cost to provide this capability is high – it is estimated that each JLTV will cost in excess of $300 thousand before equipping with essential combat systems – but not as high as the cost of the MRAP Family of Vehicles (FoV) which cost $430 – $900 thousand apiece to procure.”

Keeping with the financial theme, the strategy points to the “substantial increase in funding” that has accompanied that TWV evolution, with the Army spending approximately $6 billion per year on its TWVs (not including MRAPS) since FY’03, versus approximately $1 billion per year in the six preceding years.

“As a result, the Army now possesses greater TWV capability than at any time in recent history,” it notes. “However, capability gaps remain, and the adaptable nature of our enemies continues to stress and challenge these capabilities, necessitating further investment. Without Overseas Contingency Operations funding, the Army budget for TWVs will initially average just over $1 billion/year, slowly rising to back to approximately $2.5 billion/year in the near term. This level of funding will not support the continuation of the current pace of TWV modernization and replacement or recapitalization of the existing vehicles once they reach the end of their Economic Useful Life (EUL). The annualized cost to replace each of our current vehicles every 40 years, with a recapitalization performed mid-way, is over $2 billion/year and over $2.5 billion/year if MRAPs are included. If the Army were to replace all HMMWVs with JLTVs, this would add over $2 – $5 billion/year to these estimates, depending on the procurement rate.”

The cross challenges of capability gaps and funding issues presents what strategy planners have dubbed a “strategic crossroads,” where it “must provide Soldiers with the appropriate platforms to meet the threats of today and tomorrow,” but at the same time “cannot afford to sustain and modernize a fleet of the current size given future budget expectations.”

“The Army must therefore examine its budget, capabilities required, fleet size, and allocation processes to determine a strategy

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • InVeris
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • DSEi
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
Hilux DVD2022 GlobalMilSat

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    July 1, 2022
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    July 1, 2022
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    July 1, 2022
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2022.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT