• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2022

UK DEFENCE

February 22, 2011 by

UK DEFENCE – FOR DEFENCE EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY GREEN PAPER – READ ‘DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL FUDGE’
By Howard Wheeldon, Senior Strategist at BGC Partners

Apart from what has already been sanctioned for procurement by the MoD or equipment that might still need to be ordered on the basis of urgent operational requirement for Afghanistan the UK government will likely attempt to scale down procurement of defence equipment over the next few years. Despite the very apparent need we do not sense that even allowing for defence inflation that the government has any intention of raising the bar for defence spend post 2015. This makes the timing of the Defence & Security Review and Equipment Technology’ Green Paper all the more worrying and it reasons why some in the defence industrial base have already decided the Green Paper proposals are a complete waste of effort and time.

The Green Paper is merely a discussion paper that invites all parties concerned in the defence equipment build and procurement arena to put forward views for discussion. Even so having been so badly let down by the last government following publication of the brilliant ‘Defence Industrial Strategy’ [this was the Paul Drayson blueprint published in December 2005 as a White Paper and that was designed to bring about a more coordinated approach for MoD procurement and working between the various parties involved, a greater emphasis on through life support and export] despite the various ministerial promises that DIS would be pursued by the Brown government it never was. Indeed, to the UK defence industrial base the fact that the long promised ‘son’ of DIS failed to ever appear was seen at the time as being nothing short of being shot in the back. No wonder then that there is such a shortage of trust.

Ever since the Tory led Coalition Government landed in Westminster in May of last year the modus operandi for defence has centred on putting the needs of our forces involvement in Afghanistan together with bringing defence spend back into line with budget. Rightly although there has been little issue raised about the first of these priorities there are plenty of open concerns about the second. The individual issues contained within the UK Governments Strategic Defence and Security Review last October have already been covered sufficiently by me on previous occasions (some views are included above – note also that the delayed UK Defence (20) covering some additional aspects is still to follow) and I will not dwell further here.

Essentially as it plays out this horrible £38bn black hole in the UK defence budget bill the hope in government is that the various elements of proposed cost and capability reduction both in terms of manpower and equipment will eventually mean defence expenditure being constrained within the budget. In the meantime the problem of balancing the books is clearly being demonstrated in the unfolding events that surround the ongoing PR11 debate.

The government has also made plain a view that in terms of future procurement open competition that the promotion of open markets within the defence and security arena and desire wherever possible to buy off the shelf are of foremost importance and very high priority. Thereby hangs yet another likely intractable problem for the UK defence industrial base that may be described as another big nail placed in the coffin. Not surprisingly there is an increasing belief that the government may through the Equipment and Technology Green Paper now be talking to the UK defence industrial base with a rather forked tongue. For instance on the basis of quantity requirement alone how on earth can the UK defence industrial base possibly compete for off-the-shelf equipment that is already in production in the US? Then there is the question of who funds research and development and research and technology in the US? The answer is that on a typical cost plus research based contract the US government does meanin

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • InVeris
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • DSEi
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
Hilux DVD2022 GlobalMilSat

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    July 1, 2022
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    July 1, 2022
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    July 1, 2022
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2022.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT