• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

UK DEFENCE

July 7, 2011 by

UK DEFENCE – ANOTHER DAMNING NAO REPORT!
By Howard Wheeldon, Senior Strategist at BGC Partners

07 Jul 11. As reports on matters defence go the latest National Audit Office (Ministry of Defence – Carrier Strike) is remarkably polite in its nevertheless damming criticism of the subsequent procurement process. There is much to commend the NAO report and it should be seen as a shot across the bows to those who by their poor judgement and respective failure to conduct a proper process of strategic procurement implementation have significantly increased the potential for future financial risk. In other words and with regard to all aspects of Carrier Strike procurement the SDSR related changes demanded by the government with specific regard to air power capability and programme timing suggest that process of change has been ill considered and very poorly thought out.

Regretting the necessity but accepting the need for change the NAO report agrees that the subsequent Coalition Government decision to change the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft variant from that of STOVL to Carrier version will provide better capability. As many others have done over recent months the NAO report questions although does not directly criticise the risk-based judgement taken by the Coalition government to go without carrier strike capability for the best part of the next decade. There was however praise for the BAE Systems, Babcock International and MOD partner alliance approach that is being used to build the two aircraft carriers and the report confirms my own recent view that the CV project is progressing very well.

Despite the absence of hard language criticism the NAO report reserved the severest criticism for the MoD pointing out that the department has “an incomplete understanding of costs of the carrier decision” and particularly the risks attached to F-35 variant change. In questioning risks associated with the integration of UK capabilities with those of the carrier variant of JSF the NAO is essentially questioning the additional cost risk of requiring air-to-air refuelling, weapons integration, lack of defined user requirement (sovereignty) and dependence on the US for the next ten year gap period for initial training requirement. The report highlighted the potential large cost risk of having decided to acquire the ‘carrier’ version of the F-35 aircraft requires that one of the new UK carriers will require to be retrofitted with (the current MoD thinking is to acquire a US designed and built Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System as opposed to acquiring the lesser risk and well proven steam catapult launch based system as currently fitted to all but one of the twelve aircraft carriers in the US Navy) plus of course, the related aircraft arrester system that will also now be required.

The bottom line of the NAO report is a belief that the MoD has an incomplete understanding of costs of the new carrier build arrangement and of its acquired air power capability citing the possibility that the eventual cost could significantly exceed £10bn. Whilst it is clear that the potential for costs to rise is real and that, as the NAO delicately pointed out itself, uncertainties with regard to technical, safety and commercial remain my own view is that the ultimate plus £10bn figure that they suggest fails to take account sufficiently of the netting off of overall cost saving provided by the decision to delay operational carrier strike capability renewal for ten years (in other words the benefit to the Exchequer of the ten year gap before the UK actually will have full carrier strike capability again) and the considerable saving in capital, operational and through life cost in both financial and risk terms of the change made in F-35 aircraft variant.

Today’s report on Carrier Strike from the NAO does make for compulsive reading as it tears apart what it appears to define as a lack of full strategic thinking behind certain carrier strike

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow SOF Week 2023

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • On D-Day Anniversary, Austin, Milley Call on All to Defend Democracy

    June 6, 2023
    Read more
  • BATTLESPACE Counter Unmanned Air System (C-UAS) Supplement

    June 6, 2023
    Read more
  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    June 2, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT