13 Dec 21. Defence Committee: “We’re going to need a bigger Navy.” Today, the Defence Committee publishes its report “We’re going to need a bigger Navy” following the Committee’s inquiry into The Navy: purpose and procurement. The report finds that the next decade is one of significant risk for the Royal Navy’s fleet, and one in which the UK and the Navy will face an increasingly complex international security environment. The Committee finds that Royal Navy remains one of the most capable forces in the world and that it will be expected to take on increased responsibilities as it becomes the Government’s “tool of choice” to deliver its strategy of persistent engagement.
However, successive governments’ “failure to fund the ha’porth of tar the Royal Navy needs has literally spoiled the ships”. The fleet will continue to suffer from well documented problems with several key assets for at least the next few years:
- Delays to crucial procurement programmes mean that old ships are becoming increasingly challenging to maintain and spend too long unavailable for operations.
- Even for newer ships maintenance projects take too long. At one point in July 2021 only one of six Type 45 destroyers was not undergoing maintenance: three vessels were in refit; one was in planned maintenance; and one was “experiencing technical issues” (in layman’s English, it broke down).
- The budget for operations and maintenance is tight and will likely lead to yet more ships sitting in port, failing to deter our increasingly emboldened adversaries.
- “When ships do get to sea they act like porcupines – well defended herbivores with limited offensive capabilities”. What offensive capabilities these ships do have will be reduced even further in three years’ time when the Government retires the Harpoon anti-ship missile without a planned replacement.
- Three important vessels – RFA Argus, RFA Fort Victoria and HMS Scott – will also retire without replacements: the Navy will likely lose its current ability to provide medical care, replenish vessels at sea, and monitor the sea bed.
- The fleet is increasingly reliant on allies for many capabilities, with a limited scope to act independently, and the Government needs to do more at the political level to ensure this support will be provided when needed.
You wait six years for a new warship then three come along at once
The report finds that in 2027-28 the Navy plans to introduce three new classes of vessels (Type 26 frigates, Type 31 frigates and Fleet Solid Support ships) simultaneously. These projects must all be delivered on schedule in order to exit the period of risk that budgetary restrictions have placed the Navy in. However, they face many structural and project-specific risks, and the Ministry of Defence’s track record on delivery is far from good.
On Watch
The Committee calls for better scrutiny to ensure vessels are delivered on time. It calls for the Government to report annually to Parliament on the availability of vessels, its shipbuilding plans, and the progress of five key programmes: the construction of the Type 26 and Type 31 class frigates and the Astute and Dreadnought class submarines, and the Power Improvement Project to fix engine issues in the Type 45 destroyers.
Not enough small ships or submarines
The report finds that the Navy cannot fulfil the full ambition of the Integrated Review with its current fleet. The report calls for the escort fleet to double by acquiring more low-end capability to carry out low-end tasks, and for the Government to increase the size of the attack submarine fleet.
Supporting British Shipbuilding
The Committee finds that to deliver these new ships, the UK requires a strong domestic shipbuilding industry. It calls for the planned refresh of the National Shipbuilding Strategy to finally take on board the consistent recommendations the Government has been given over the last fifteen years: provide a steady pipeline of work for British shipyards, prioritise building vessels in the UK, work collaboratively with industry, promote exports, and actively intervene to support the modernisation of shipyards. It emphasises that the Fleet Solid Support ships that are currently being competed must be built quickly in UK shipyards.
Chair of the Defence Committee, Tobias Ellwood MP, said: “The Royal Navy has a long and proud history protecting our nation at sea. To maintain our position as one of the leading global navies, the Government must deliver a rapid programme of modernisation and growth. The next ten years will prove a test for our naval fleet. The UK is faced with an increasingly hostile and unpredictable international environment but the Government is still reducing funding, retiring capability and asking the Navy to rely on increasingly elderly vessels for the next five years until new ships come in. The timely delivery of these new ships is crucial to plug the hole in our naval capabilities. However, the Ministry of Defence has a poor track record projects like this. We need a firm hand on the tiller to navigate us through the next decade. Overall our Navy needs more ships, armed with more lethal weapons and the most up to date technology. We have the shipyards and the knowhow to build them: the Government just needs to place the orders and give UK shipbuilding the commitment and confidence it needs to deliver. Of all the Services, the Government is most ambitious for the Navy. However, if the Government does not deliver the ships and capabilities the Navy needs, that ambition will be holed below the waterline.”
House of Commons and House of Lords Hansard Written Answers
Ajax Vehicles: Procurement
Question for Ministry of Defence
Question
Mr Kevan Jones
Labour
North Durham
Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many vehicle boxes have been delivered by GD from Spain to the factory in Wales.
Answer
Jeremy Quin
Conservative
Horsham
Commons
Answered on 16 December 2021
296 Ajax Hulls have been delivered to the GD factory in Wales.
Navy: Shipping
Question for Ministry of Defence
Question
Mr Kevan Jones
Labour
North Durham
Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, in the context of his Department’s decision to buy up to 61 new intercept vessels, which vessels they will be replacing; when the Department will tender for the design of those new vehicles; and what estimate his Department has made of the cost of the contract.
Answer
Jeremy Quin
Conservative
Horsham
Commons
Answered on 16 December 2021
A tender was issued on 10 December 2021 for the procurement of up to 61 new intercept vessels. The deadline for tender response is 4 February 2022 after which responses will be assessed against the various assessment criteria. It is expected that the Invitation to Negotiate will be issued in March 2022. The Intercept and Escort Craft project’s aim is to replace the following craft variants:
- Avon Sea Rider
- Pacific 22 and 24
- Arctic 24
- Delta Dive Rigid Inflatable Boats
The project will reduce the number of variants currently operated while upgrading capability.
The estimated tender value has been advertised at between £16 m and £26 m.
Merlin Helicopters: Expenditure
Question for Ministry of Defence
Question
John Healey
Labour
Wentworth and Dearne
Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 22 November 2021 to Question 76577, on Merlin Helicopters: Expenditure, whether the incorrect recording of Merlin component lives leading to the fruitless payment of £20.995m is related to the loss of Merlin Helicopter engineering record cards referred to in the fruitless payments section on page 160 of the Ministry of Defence Annual Reports and Accounts 2011-12 resulting in a fruitless payment of £564,000.
Answer
Jeremy Quin
Conservative
Horsham
Commons
Answered on 16 December 2021
The two fruitless payments covered in these Annual Report and Accounts (ARAc) entries relate to separate events. The fruitless payment of £20.995 m, referenced in the Department’s ARAc financial year (FY) 2014-15, reflect additional costs incurred under the Integrated Merlin Operational Support contract including a period of reduced aircraft availability in delivery of the Merlin Capability Sustainment Programme. There were underlying issues with some aspects of data and asset management on this platform within the Department leading to additional costs under the support contract and as a result of limiting availability of aircraft for a capability sustainment programme. The £0.564m fruitless payment covered in the FY2011-12 ARAc relates to the same Operational Support Contract. The payment was for additional costs that were incurred by the supplier due to the loss within the Ministry of Defence of a number of Engineering Record Cards. Component lives and the consumption of these lives as well as records of modification, repair and overhaul, were recorded on the cards. Without this information, worst case assumptions (penalty lives) had to be made about the life of components in order to be assured that the aircraft remained safe, which increased the need for maintenance and replacement parts. The Department has since reviewed and improved its procedures, including the use of new record-keeping software, to avoid further such costs arising.
Boxer Vehicles: Testing
Question for Ministry of Defence
UIN 90834, tabled on 10 December 2021
Question
Mr Kevan Jones
Labour
North Durham
Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department plans to conduct reliability growth trials for Boxer.
Answer
Jeremy Quin
Conservative
Horsham
Commons
Answered on 15 December 2021
The UK Mechanised Infantry Programme will conduct confirmatory reliability tests, however there are currently no plans to conduct reliability growth trials for BOXER as the base Off the Shelf vehicle is already a qualified design and the project is drawing from existing reliability data. This will be kept under review.
Artillery: Procurement
Question for Ministry of Defence
Question
John Healey
Labour
Wentworth and Dearne
Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the total cost of the Mobile Fires Programme is and if the programme will remain on budget.
Answer
Jeremy Quin
Conservative
Horsham
Commons
Answered on 15 December 2021
The Mobile Fires Platform (the principal project within the Close Fires Programme) remains in the Concept phase. It is, therefore, too early to understand the whole life cost of the Programme.
Artillery: Procurement
Question for Ministry of Defence
Question
John Healey
Labour
Wentworth and Dearne
Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when does he expect the Mobile Fires Programme to reach initial operational capability.
Answer
Jeremy Quin
Conservative
Horsham
Commons
Answered on 15 December 2021
On current plans, an Initial Operating Capability for the Mobile Fires Platform will be achieved in 2029.