• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

HOW MUCH MORE IS THE CRAZY CANON PROJECT GOING TO COST

April 1, 2009 by

HOW MUCH MORE IS THE CRAZY CANON PROJECT GOING TO COST THE TAXPAYER?
By Julian Nettlefold

18 Mar 09. In spite of promises by BAE Systems to include the Editor in its CTA canon updates, the Editor was deliberately omitted from a Press Briefing by CTAI on March 18th as BAE Systems told him that, “Your opinions seem unshakeable and would not help our cause.” Some industry executives have their doubts about CTA and call the project ‘The Crazy Canon Company.’ Most people who know the Project have great praise for CTA supremo David Leslie’s salesmanship in keeping the project alive with millions in borrowed money being poured down a deep black hole. Where have we seen this before? John Reed’s excellent book, ‘It Costs a Bomb’ should now be updated with CTAI as Chapter 1.

Having seen the piece written by Andrew Chuter of Defense News, I can see their point, the information provided reinforces our view that CTAI is another ‘UK Special’ Programme doomed to failure, costing the taxpayer millions. Millions, which at this time of budgets problems, we can ill afford.

Defense News reported that, ‘The joint venture, based at Bourges in central France, has spent 75 million euros ($102 million) developing the weapon. The French and British governments have plowed an additional 25 million euros into the work, mostly to fund turret demonstrator programs using the weapon.’

Given that the Project has been ongoing for 15 years the interest alone on €100 million at a conservative 5% compound would account for a final cost of €240 million up to 2014 before one single canon is sold! This does not account for wages and continued development costs and the cost of building the plant post 2009. How many Bushmaster canons could have been procured for €240m to save lives in Afghanistan in Iraq, not wait until 2014 for more money to be poured down the drain which could buy this equipment!

The Defense News article said that, ‘CTAI Chairman David Leslie told reporters attending a March 18 briefing here that the qualification effort would begin in the fourth quarter of this year.’

We asked Mike Sweeney of BAE Systems who would pay the huge cost of qualifying the gun and ammunition to Production Level TRL 9. He said that the MoD and the DGA had agreed on a Joint Project but would not say what the cost would be or who would pay it. BAE said they have fired around 1400 rounds although sources suggest that the U.S. Requirement is for at least 60,000 rounds in all weathers to prove the system. CTA’s performance in the cold is not known. He said they were working on developing cheaper versions of the round using automotive and beer industry techniques. We reported from a source last month that the price per round could be £150.00, £1500 for a 10 round burst! The Editor was then accused of being a Luddite not a realist! BAE did not confirm whether they had solved the reported barrel wear problems or the round ‘wobble’ at 500m which caused accuracy problems.

Lockheed Martin’s CTA solution is reported to be progressing well a source suggested that they were using a simpler ammunition feed systems and had solved the reported obturation problems.

We then asked BAE Systems the cost of building the production line and the filling plant. Sweeney told BATTLESPACE that the round would form part of the £120 million MASS ammunition Project but he declined to say how much the line would cost to put in at Glascoed. We then asked about the extra logistic costs for the UK and France to ship the ammunition into theatre and what would happen if they ran out as there would be no second source, he said that BAE hoped by that time that any other customers would have purchased the system including the US who would retrofit CTA into their Bradleys. Dan Zinini of SAIC’s FCS Team told BATTLESPACE at AUSA that the FCS Team has no intention of putting CTA into their vehicles and would stick with the Bushmaster 30mm.

It seems unlikely that the U.S. would choose a

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    February 3, 2023
    Read more
  • VETERANS UPDATE

    February 3, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    February 3, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT