• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2023

FUKISHIMA AND THE FUTURE OF ROBOTS

March 31, 2011 by

FUKISHIMA AND THE FUTURE OF ROBOTS
By Len Zuga

Mar 11. Two items plucked from the ether recently clearly illustrate limitations of the state of the art in ground robotics and UGV operations. The first, from IEEE Spectrum’s ongoing coverage of Japan’s earthquake and nuclear emergency, Can Japan Send In Robots To Fix Troubled Nuclear Reactors?
(http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/industrial-robots/japan-robots-to-fix-troubled-nuclear-reactors ) deals with the limitations of mobility in non structured and rubble strewn environments; the sensitivity of electronics that have not been hardened against the effects of radiation on their operation; and finally the historical lack of investment by the nuclear power industry in developing robotic solutions to address nuclear disasters such as the Fukushima incident.

These issues are all addressed in the larger context of my forthcoming market analysis Global Mobile Defense, Rescue & Security Robots – Sensors & Payloads – Markets & Technologies Outlook 2011-2021 to be published by Market Intel Group ( www.marketintelgroup.com ). But I want to briefly bring attention to the postings and ieee Spectrum’s Erico Guizzo’s well written article because by analyzing UGV shortcomings in dealing with the Fukushima disaster Guizzo uses current real world examples to illustrate the limitations of the state of the art in ground robotics.

Leaving the technical details for your reading of the article I want to further comment on two critical points that might be glossed over by technologists. First there are the costs of radiation hardening of the electronics to withstand the radiation levels that the UGVs would be exposed to when operating in or in close proximity to the reactors. Secondly there is the reluctance of the nuclear power industry to invest in research and development of robots that could have been up to the job. And of course at the root of both of these issues are the perceived economic value of the necessary investment and the tradeoffs that took place early on as the prime determinants of what technologies eventually get developed, marketed and adopted.

Starting with the electronics. I had the good fortune to work in the microwave components industry in the pre-COTs era making parts for space craft, fighter jets and air defense radars. Radiation hardening http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hardening was a specified requirement for all space qualified hardware and much of electronics that went in to weapons systems. And of course that process drove the costs of these systems far above those of their commercial counterparts without rad hardening.

Rad hardening was but one component reliability specification adhered to in the pre COTs era. There were many including MTBFs for each lowly component as well as for the entire system.

Bear in mind that today’s UGVs are all built with COTs components and that, as I noted in the sensors and payloads market research report, UGV reliability has not kept pace with their rate of fielding and rapid growth of operational hours. To ensure reliable operation of UGVs at the vehicle level, the many components or parts that comprise the UGV must be reliable. The components of a UGV that are important for reliable operations include sensors (such as cameras, laser or sonar range finders, thermal sensors, etc.), effectors (such as motors, grippers, etc.), power sources (such as batteries or engines) and platforms (including the robot base, wheels or tracks, manipulator arms, etc.). System-level issues important for reliable operations include control (from low-level motor control to higher-level autonomous behaviors), human-machine interface (including joysticks and displays), and communication (e.g., wireless). Despite having gained some success, UGVs are currently far from being reliable. Reliability studies of UGVs show that the Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) for a UGV is currently only between 6 to 24 hour

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • DSEi
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Commando Spirit - Blended Scoth Whisy
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
Hilux Military Raceday Novemeber 2023 Chepstow SOF Week 2023

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    May 26, 2023
    Read more
  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    May 26, 2023
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    May 26, 2023
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2023.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT