• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Excelitas Qioptiq banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media Pack 2022

BRITISH ARMY IN LINE FOR CUTS

July 13, 2010 by

12 Jul 10. Reuters reported that Britain’s army is likely to be first in line for cuts under a wide-ranging defence review that could also see major procurement programmes scaled back and a re-think of the country’s global military role.

Due in the autumn, the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) promises a shake up of the military as the government slashes spending to tackle a big budget deficit, and after questionable success in campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. Defence officials are giving no clues other than cuts will be less severe than the 25 percent of savings being asked of other government departments, and that Britain could save on hardware through joint procurement with allies such as France.

Amid much speculation, several analysts predict a cut of at least 10 to 15 percent in the defence budget — £36.9bn ($55.97bn) for the current financial year — in real terms, spread in part over the coming few years.

They predict the streamlining of ministry bureaucracy, a cut in personnel numbers and scaling down of hardware programmes, but views diverge on exactly where the axe will fall.

Britain’s alliances are also being questioned, based on the need to balance more emphasis on self interest given Britain’s constrained resources and experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, with the need to share the defence burden with allies.

“My hunch is that the single biggest reduction that will be made in the SDSR will be of personnel numbers in the army,” said Michael Clarke, director of the Royal United Services Institute, an influential defence thinktank in London.

Analysts agreed that Britain would be far more wary now of embarking on another mission such as Afghanistan, involving large deployments of ground troops and armoured vehicles, and expected instead relatively quick interventions which may lend themselves to a greater emphasis on combined air and sea power.

Prime Minister David Cameron, who took office in May, has said he wants British combat troops home from Afghanistan within five years after concern over a rising death toll. Britain has around 9,500 troops there now.

HARDWARE PROGRAMMES

Defence analyst Charles Heyman, editor of the Armed Forces of the United
Kingdom, expects army personnel to fall to about 85,000 from 102,000 currently, while RUSI has earlier said it expects a fall of 30,000 across the military. Britain’s army is already smaller than that of France and Germany. Heyman also expects army procurement to be scaled back.

“One of the reasons it is less difficult to cut in the army, is there are not as many army procurement programmes and they are not as costly, except for armoured vehicles, as the naval and airforce programmes, which are already in place and would incur a default cost should they be stopped,” he said.

The Ministry of Defence this month said it had signed a £500m contract with General Dynamics for an initial tranche of armoured vehicles, but whether it would order more would be subject to the SDSR.

Other analysts also expected a significant cut in army spending, but three also pointed to likely savings from Britain’s airforce. They said plans to buy Eurofighter Typhoon combat jets would probably be downsized or scrapped. Made by Britain’s BAE Systems with Italian group Finmeccanica and European aerospace group EADS, Britain has ordered 160 of the £70m pound planes. Support costs can dwarf the cost of the aircraft. Analysts believe it could cost Britain some £2bn in contractual
penalties if it pulled out, but the MoD insists that all hardware programmes are under review.

“(Defence minister) Liam Fox said that we don’t want systems related to the Cold War … It (Typhoon) was designed to take on advanced Soviet fighters,” said Eric Grove of the University of Salford centre for International Security and War Studies.

Analysts also say Britain’s involvement in the development of the delayed and over-budget EADS-built A400M transport plane is vulne

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • qioptiq.com
  • Exensor
  • TCI
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Visit the Viasat website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • InVeris
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • businesswire logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • DSEi
  • Atkins
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • KME logo
  • sibylline logo
Hilux DVD2022 GlobalMilSat

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
Old Charlock
Abthorpe Road
Silverstone
Towcester NN12 8TW

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • EXHIBITIONS AND CONFERENCES

    August 5, 2022
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    August 5, 2022
    Read more
  • CONTRACT NEWS IN BRIEF

    August 5, 2022
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2022.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT