• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • SPECTRA banner
  • Curtiss-Wright banner

BATTLESPACE Updates

   +44 (0)77689 54766
   

  • Home
  • Features
  • News Updates
  • Defence Engage
  • Company Directory
  • About
  • Contact

EU-NATO cooperation: protecting the institutional relationship from political storms By Julia Himmrich Research Fellow By Denitsa Raynova Project Manager and Research Associate

June 26, 2017 by Julian Nettlefold

21 Jun 17. As the dust from NATO’s summit in May settles, Brussels gears up for a European Council meeting this week. Europe’s leaders are reflecting on a change in the political mood after President Trump’s visit and seem determined to show they can strengthen the continent’s security.

But how? Given the political tensions in the Euro-Atlantic area, this European Council should not miss the opportunity to reinforce the institutional backbone of Europe’s security through a closer EU-NATO relationship.

Last year, the EU-NATO Joint Declaration set out areas in which the two institutions should cooperate more closely. Previously, despite sharing 22 member states in common, cooperation on security between the EU and NATO had been stymied by political obstacles and the lack of a clear mandate. Since the Joint Declaration, international staffs at NATO and the EU have worked to implement 42 action points in seven key areas: countering hybrid threats, operational cooperation, exercises, cyber security and defence, defence capabilities, defence industry and research, and defence and security capacity building in third countries.

Significant progress has been made, especially in improving communication and coordination between the two institutions. In the process, transparency, trust and evidence of the benefits of cooperation between the EU, NATO and their respective member states has grown.

This progress is all the more noteworthy for having been achieved amidst new political rifts – on top of the long-standing blocks on good EU-NATO working placed by EU member Cyprus and NATO member Turkey. Following Turkey’s constitutional referendum, the EU’s relations with Turkey have deteriorated. After Austria brought EU accession talks with Turkey to a halt, President Erdogan put into question NATO collaboration with non-NATO partners like Austria. Worsening relations between Turkey and Germany are unlikely to help. And President Trump’s attitude towards America’s Allies is making some EU member states uneasy about the political risks of a relationship with NATO.

In the circumstances, it would be tempting for EU leaders this week to think that placing more of their countries’ security in EU hands and giving up on the frustrations of working with non-EU Allies in NATO would be the way to go.

Yet transatlantic unity and a strong EU-NATO relationship remain essential for the future of European security and defence. Closer EU-NATO relations offer a more sustainable and inclusive vision of Europe’s contribution to defence than the two overlapping institutions each going it alone. Closer relations would help increase efficiency and optimise defence spending. More importantly still, they could deliver a more coherent defence planning process, greater sustainability of operations and stronger relationships with partner countries.

Earlier this month, the EU Commission set out several possible visions for future European defence. In a loose integration scenario the EU would continue to cooperate with NATO in some areas, under the current mandate of the Joint Declaration. In the most integrated scenario, the Commission envisions the EU and NATO as mutually reinforcing partners sharing the responsibility for the defence of Europe. This is one sign of new momentum for European defence integration, the end goal of which could be much greater EU-NATO synergy.

Member states committed to closer collaboration between the EU and NATO should respond to political differences in Europe and across the Atlantic with a clear and ambitious message of collaboration for the two institutions.

In May 2017 the European Leadership Network published our in-depth report examining the inter-institutional relationship and the progress achieved so far. We argued that EU Member States and NATO Allies ought to be more ambitious about the relationship between the two institutions, building on the new dynamic of cooperation created so far. We identified key actions required to improve and facilitate cooperation. These recommendations were endorsed in a group statement by 62 distinguished European statesmen and women.

Ahead of the European Council meeting this Thursday, European leaders could borrow from these recommendations and consider five practical measures that would make a real difference to Europe’s security:

• Start with a discussion on additional resources and staffing for NATO and the EU dedicated to improving their institutional cooperation.

• Follow through by expanding the EU’s capacity and investing in secure communications, security clearance for more staff and training them to work with classified information.

• Encourage closer coordination between EU and NATO permanent representations in Brussels, and in relevant partner countries.

• Explore the creation of additional security Centres of Excellence, steered by both institutions.

• Support EU-NATO collaboration in partner countries. Consider on-the-ground cooperation to bridge institutional obstacles.

After the EU Foreign Affairs Council on Monday, ministers stressed the importance and positive progress of current EU-NATO cooperation. The European Council meeting on Thursday is an opportunity to affirm this reality and turn words into deeds.

The opinions articulated above represent the views of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Leadership Network or any of its members. The ELN’s aim is to encourage debates that will help develop Europe’s capacity to address the pressing foreign, defence, and security challenges of our time.

Filed Under: News Update

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • Pythia
  • Teledyne
  • Exensor
  • Visit the Oxley website
  • Blighter
  • SPECTRA
  • Britbots logo
  • Faun Trackway
  • Systematic
  • CISION logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ProTEK logo
  • ssafa logo
  • IEE
  • EXFOR logo
  • sibylline logo
  • Team Thunder logo
  • Comtech logo
  • GoExporting logo
  • ECHODYNE logo
  • Supercat logo
  • Galvion logo
  • Leonardo DRS logo
  • MTC logo
  • IDC logo
  • DSEI logo
  • DVD2024 logo
  • SDSC logo
  • TELEDYNE FLIR logo
  • VeteranUK logo
  • Matrix Space logo
  • ST Engineering logo
  • EWS logo
  • sentinel photonics logo
  • capua logo
  • Curtiss-Wright logo
  • Brave1 logo
  • Drone Evolution logo
  • AEI Systems logo
  • EOS logo
  • NMSUK logo
  • Openworks logo
  • Sandown Park logo
Hilux UKDSE AARTOS ST Engineering Future Artillery

Contact Us

BATTLESPACE Publications
41 St Georges Drive
London SW1V 4DG

+44 (0)77689 54766

BATTLESPACE Technologies

An international defence electronics news service providing our readers with up to date developments in the defence electronics industry.

Recent News

  • Protek Selected By Dutch Armed Forces

    May 2, 2026
    Read more
  • PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS

    May 1, 2026
    Read more
  • MANAGEMENT ON THE MOVE

    May 1, 2026
    Read more

Copyright BATTLESPACE Publications © 2002–2026.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website, we'll assume you're ok with this.   Read More  Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT